Revisiting trust in the digital era
The interplay of online trust and online dialogic communication from the practitioners' perspective
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21696022 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Suk Chong Tong (0000-0003-2644-7524, Hong Kong Shue Yan University), Fanny Fong Yee Chan (0000-0002-5801-3029, Hang Seng University of Hong Kong) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 271-293 |
| Publication date | 2022-08-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Communication Management (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1363-254X • E-ISSN: 1478-0852 |
| Publisher | Emerald (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1108/jcom-08-2021-0094 |
| OpenAlex | W4282970600 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 48 |
Purpose With the prevailing use of online communication platforms, this study revisits the definitions of trust in an online context. By exploring organizational online communications from a practitioners' perspective, a conceptual framework that illustrates the nature of trust and its relationship with dialogic communication between organizations and organizations' stakeholders in the digital era is proposed. Design/methodology/approach A total of 27 in-depth interviews were conducted with public relations and marketing practitioners involved in coordinating organizational online communications in Hong Kong. Findings From the practitioners' perspective, stakeholders' online trust toward an organization, which is a hybridity of initial and rapidly evolving trust, begins with stakeholders swift and initial judgment of the organization according to category-based cues (including knowledge-based attributes of the organization, institutional cues, and particular attributes of online dialogic communication) available on online platforms and further develops over time. Practitioners regard the integration of online and offline communication platforms to be the most effective way to build trust in organization–stakeholder relationships in the digital era, while dialectical tensions can hinder trust formed in online communication. Originality/value Along with the proposed conceptual framework, this study advances the discussion of online trust in public relations practices from the practitioners' perspective. A qualitative approach provides rich descriptions that may help to enrich theories in public relations and communication management regarding the interplay of trust and dialogic communication in organizational practices in the digital era
Corporate communication · Dialogic · Knowledge management · Organizational communication · Originality · Political science · Public relations · Qualitative research · Sociology · Stakeholder · Communication in Education and Healthcare · Computer Science · Public Relations and Crisis Communication · Team Dynamics and Performance
Building dialogic relationships through the world wide web
The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management
Theoretical Importance of Contingency in Human-Computer Interaction
Furnishing the Edifice
Semi-Structured Interviewing and Qualitative Analysis
Give the Emperor a Mirror
Individual Swift Trust and Knowledge-Based Trust in Face-to-Face and Virtual Team Members
Building Effective Online Marketplaces with Institution-Based Trust
Toward a dialogic theory of public relations
Developing and Maintaining Trust in Work Relationships
Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History
An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust
Conversational agents in online organization–stakeholder interactions
Evaluating universities' strategic online communication
Swift Trust and Temporary Groups
When Suits Meet Roots
The sinister attribution error
Effects of Perceived Interactivity, Perceived Web Assurance and Disposition to Trust on Initial Online Trust
Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams
The contribution of studies of source credibility to a theory of interpersonal trust in the communication process
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |