Perceived Utility and Learning by Dominican University Students in Virtual Teaching–Learning Environments
An Analysis of Multiple Serial Mediation Based on the Extended Technology Acceptance Model
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21729409 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Clemente Rodríguez-Sabiote (0000-0003-3094-9199, Universidad de Granada), Ana T Valerio-Peña (0000-0002-2286-0883, Instituto Superior de Formación Docente Salomé Ureña), Roberto A Batista-Almonte (0000-0001-6895-6402, Instituto Superior de Formación Docente Salomé Ureña), Álvaro Manuel Úbeda-Sánchez (0000-0001-8948-8767, Universidad de Jaén) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 20-40 |
| Publication date | 2024-05-16 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1492-3831 • E-ISSN: 1492-3831 |
| Publisher | Athabasca University Press (PUBLISHER • CA) |
| DOI | 10.19173/irrodl.v25i2.7578 |
| OpenAlex | W4396947865 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 17 |
The global pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus brought about a true revolution in the predominant teaching–learning processes (i.e., face-to-face environment) that had been implemented up to that point. In this regard, virtual teaching–learning environments (VTLEs) have gained unprecedented significance. The main objectives of our research were to define an explanatory theoretical model and to test a multiple serial mediation model with four variables in series (one independent variable plus three mediators) to relate perceived utility (independent variable) in the use of a VTLE and perceived learning (dependent or criterion variable) in such contexts, taking into account the mediation of subjective norm (mediator 1), ease of use (mediator 2), and intention to use behavior (mediator 3), and using the extended technology acceptance model as the theoretical framework. Additionally, we aimed to analyze the direct and indirect relationships and effects among the variables that constituted the proposed model. Methodologically, the research can be classified as a cross-sectional causal ex post facto design. A representative sample of students enrolled in higher education institutions in the Dominican Republic was used as the research population, and a standardized Likert scale was administered to measure the five dimensions of the proposed model. Finally, it is worth noting that the obtained results indicate that all direct and indirect effects considered in the model were statistically significant, except for the indirect effect, where the four predictor variables were arranged in series to verify their influence on the criterion variable: perceived learning
Educational technology · Human–computer interaction · Mathematics education · Mediation · Multimedia · Social science · Sociology · Computer Science · Psychology · Technology Adoption and User Behaviour · Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
Developing a General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning (Getamel) by analysing commonly used external factors
Ordinal Versions of Coefficients Alpha and Theta for Likert Rating Scales
Blended learning
Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use
Investigating learners’ attitudes toward virtual reality learning environments
Online education in the post-Covid era
SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models
Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology
What Can We Learn about Science Teachers’ Technology Use during the Covid-19 Pandemic
Pandemic politics, pedagogies and practices
Engaging learners in the emergency transition to online learning during the Covid-19 pandemic
Exploring pre‐service teachers' use of technology
Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis
Realidad virtual
What Do We Mean by Blended Learning
The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research
Conditional Process Analysis
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |