“It has a chilling effect”
How secondary social studies teachers across the country are navigating discriminatory censorship laws
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21747153 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kaylene M Stevens (0000-0002-0077-8184, Boston University, corresponding author), Erin Fife (Boston University), Christopher C Martell (0000-0002-3251-3439, University of Massachusetts Boston) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Pages | 1-20 |
| Publication date | 2025-09-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1550-5170 • E-ISSN: 2156-8154 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/15505170.2025.2549839 |
| OpenAlex | W4413924121 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 21 |
A growing number of U.S. states have passed laws that restrict the teaching of certain topics, usually involving race, gender, and sexual orientation, in school. Employing critical theory, we examined the reaction of secondary social studies teachers in five states with and without discriminatory censorship laws (DCLs) through surveys (N = 319) and interviews (N = 28). We found that there were differences in how teachers experience DCLs based on geographic location, teaching status/experience, financial security, administrative support, and community context. Most teachers, despite these differences, reported that the laws were harmful to their students and the profession. This harm varied from experienced teachers leaving the field, to students learning an inaccurate or incomplete version of history, to marginalized students experiencing further marginalization and attacks on their identities. At the same time, teachers described protective factors that insulated them and allowed for a greater ability to resist what they saw as harmful laws. Overall, the social studies teachers reported that these laws are intended to silence discussions of important topics, which ultimately have a negative impact on their students’ learning
Censorship · Political science · Sociology · Critical Race Theory in Education · Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy · Law · Peace and Human Rights Education
Let’s face it, the racial politics are always there
“Divisive Issues” and Collateral Damage
Who’s indoctrinating whom
Conceptualizing United States democracy
Teaching the US 2018 midterm elections
Rethinking Critical Theory and Qualitative Research
Toward a Critical Race Theory of Education
But These Are Our Stories! Critical Conversations about Bans on Diverse Literature
Divisive Concepts” Legislation Reaching into Tennessee Secondary Classrooms Has “Chilling Effect” on Teachers
It's a form of psychological warfare against educators”
US teacher opposition to so-called critical race theory bans
Critical Theory and Rationality in Citizenship Education
Divisive Concepts in Classrooms
What Do So‐Called Critical Race Theory Bans Mean for Elementary Literacy Instruction
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |