Measuring experiences of facility-based care for pregnant women and newborns
A scoping review
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21880969 |
|---|---|
| Authors | E Larson (0000-0002-4099-536X, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, corresponding author), Jigyasa Sharma (0000-0001-8860-0710, Harvard Global Health Institute), Khalidha Nasiri (0000-0003-0753-1085, Western University), Meghan A Bohren (0000-0002-4179-4682, The University of Melbourne), Özge Tunçalp (0000-0002-5370-682X, World Health Organization) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 11 |
| Pages | e003368 |
| Publication date | 2020-11-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | BMJ Global Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2059-7908 • E-ISSN: 2059-7908 |
| Publisher | BMJ (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003368 |
| PMID | 33219000 |
| OpenAlex | W3101322463 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 15 |
| References cited | 30 |
BACKGROUND: Access to high-quality, person-centred care during pregnancy and childbirth is a global priority. Positive experience of care is key in particular, because it is both a fundamental right and can influence health outcomes and future healthcare utilisation. Despite its importance for accountability and action, systematic guidance on measuring experience of care is limited. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of published literature to identify measures/instruments for experience of facility-based pregnancy and childbirth (abortion, antenatal, intrapartum, postnatal and newborn) care. We systematically searched five bibliographic databases from 1 January 2007 through 1 February 2019. Using a predefined evidence template, we extracted data on study design, data collection method, study population and care type as reported in primary quantitative articles. We report results narratively. RESULTS: We retrieved 16 528 unique citations, including 171 eligible articles representing, 157 unique instruments and 144 unique parent instruments across 56 countries. Half of the articles (90/171) did not use a validated instrument. While 82% (n=141) of articles reported on labour and childbirth care, only one reported on early pregnancy/abortion care. The most commonly reported sub-domains of user experience were communication (84%, 132/157) and respect and dignity (71%, 111/157). The primary purpose of most papers was measurement (70%, 119/171), largely through cross-sectional surveys. CONCLUSION: There are alarming gaps in measurement of user experience for abortion, antenatal, postnatal and newborn care, including lack of validated instruments to measure the effects of interventions and policies on user experience. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION DETAILS: This review was registered and published on PROSPERO (CRD42017070867). PROSPERO is an international database of prospectively registered systematic reviews in health and social care
Abortion · Accountability · Alternative medicine · Childbirth · Data collection · Dignity · Environmental health · Family medicine · Health care · Population · Pregnancy · Psychological intervention · Global Maternal and Child Health · Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions · Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum · Medicine · Nursing
The Impact of Culturally-Centered Care on Peripartum Experiences of Autonomy and Respect in Community Birth Centers
Exploring Women’s Perceived Quality of Antenatal Care
Identifying women with poor experience of post-abortion care
Development of a survey tool to measure pediatric experience of care
The use of Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) and Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R) in comparing the experiences of mothers with and without HIV in Tanzania
Mistreatment of women during childbirth and postpartum depression
Measuring experience of and satisfaction with newborn care
Decentralization and Equitable Service Delivery
Measures to assess quality of postnatal care
Cross sectional survey of maternal and newborn quality of care in Niger
A scoping review, mapping, and prioritisation process for emergency obstetric and neonatal quality of care indicators
Research prioritisation on prevention and management of preterm birth in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) with a special focus on Bangladesh using the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) method
‘One woman, one bed’
A systematic review of population and patient perspectives and experiences as measured in Latin American and Caribbean surveys
Obstetric Racism
Quality of care for pregnant women and newborns—the WHO vision
The Giving Voice to Mothers study
The Quality of Care
How women are treated during facility-based childbirth in four countries
Quality of basic maternal care functions in health facilities of five African countries
Facilitators and barriers to facility-based delivery in low- and middle-income countries
A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness
Can available interventions end preventable deaths in mothers, newborn babies, and stillbirths, and at what cost?
Countdown to 2030
The Mistreatment of Women during Childbirth in Health Facilities Globally
High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era
First, Do No Harm
Yes, no, maybe so
Which aspects of non-clinical quality of care are most important? Results from WHO's general population surveys of "health systems responsiveness" in 41 countries
| Citations per year | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Highly cited | No |