Thinking Classrooms in Graduate Engineering Education
A Pedagogical Framework for Autonomy and Problem-Solving
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22042981 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Francisco Romero-Sánchez (0000-0001-6235-4435, Universidad de Extremadura, corresponding author), Gonzalo Alonso-Pinto (0009-0003-7737-2910, Consejería de Educación de la Junta de Castilla y León), Rafael Agujetas Ortiz (0000-0001-8710-5785, Universidad de Extremadura), Francisco Javier Alonso Sánchez (0000-0001-8683-6471, Universidad de Extremadura) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 350 |
| Publication date | 2026-02-23 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Education Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2227-7102 • E-ISSN: 2227-7102 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/educsci16020350 |
| OpenAlex | W7131118226 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 30 |
Innovative pedagogies that nurture higher-order competencies such as autonomy and problem-solving are critical in graduate STEM contexts. This study conceptualizes Thinking Classrooms as a pedagogical framework for graduate engineering education and examines how classroom practices associated with this approach support the development of autonomous learning and complex problem-solving. Drawing on classroom-based evidence collected over multiple academic cohorts in a master’s program in mechanical engineering, we describe patterns of student engagement, instructor adaptations, and evolving learning behaviors. Our findings highlight the potential of Thinking Classroom principles to inform instructional design, foster learner agency, and strengthen disciplinary problem-solving practices in postgraduate engineering education. We discuss implications for curriculum development and future research directions in STEM education
Autonomy · Critical thinking · Curriculum · Curriculum development · Discipline · Engineering education · Graduate students · Nature versus nurture · Career Development and Diversity · Evaluation of Teaching Practices · Science Education and Pedagogy
A systematic review of research on the flipped learning method in engineering education
Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning
A taxonomy of problem‐based learning methods
Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha
Challenges of Active Learning in a View of Integrated Engineering Education
Beyond Bologna? Infrastructuring quality in European higher education
Students’ motivation and engagement in higher education
The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits
The Role of Metacognitive Knowledge in Learning, Teaching, and Assessing
| Highly cited | No |
|---|