Improving Student Success through Supplemental Instruction in an Anatomy and Physiology Laboratory
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22047642 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Irina Ellison (Mercy University, corresponding author), Ferdinand Esser (Mercy University), Jean Walsh (Mercy University), Christian Lucio (Mercy University), Joan Toglia (0000-0002-6902-6853, Mercy University) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 11 |
| Pages | 1153 |
| Publication date | 2023-11-17 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Education Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2227-7102 • E-ISSN: 2227-7102 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/educsci13111153 |
| OpenAlex | W4388762092 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 20 |
Anatomy and physiology courses have been identified as a major barrier to the persistence and graduation of undergraduate students seeking careers in the health professions. This break in the health profession’s educational pipeline may have implications for perpetuating racial/ethnic educational attainment disparities that further health disparities through a lack of representation in healthcare providers. Although Supplemental Instruction (SI) is a well-developed, evidence-based program for improving student success, it has traditionally been used primarily in lecture-based courses. In addition, much of the literature on peer-assisted learning in anatomy and physiology focuses on medical school students. Therefore, it is difficult to extrapolate the effectiveness of SI on freshman and sophomore undergraduate students in a laboratory-based course. Here, we describe the expansion of our SI program, in conjunction with a complete curricular redesign, to address student success in an undergraduate gateway anatomy and physiology laboratory. Students who participated in the SI laboratory sessions held outside of instructor-led class time were significantly more likely to be high performers in the course, and there were no students who participated in SI sessions who earned a final course grade below a C. In addition, students expressed high satisfaction with the SI program and indicated that SI leaders provided both content and emotional support. In conclusion, SI is a valuable program to address student success in a laboratory-based course, particularly when integrated thoughtfully and intentionally with other evidence-based best practices in curriculum
Curriculum · Medical education · Pedagogy · Anatomy and Medical Technology · Biomedical and Engineering Education · Innovations in Medical Education · Medicine · Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |