Constructivist Paths in Teaching Physics
Electrostatics
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22047752 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anna Kaminska (0000-0001-8712-8979, Akademia Pomorska w Słupsku), Helena Nowakowska (0000-0002-6342-1596, Institute of Fluid Flow-Machinery), Grzegorz P Karwasz (0000-0001-7090-3123, Nicolaus Copernicus University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 889 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Education Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2227-7102 • E-ISSN: 2227-7102 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/educsci16060889 |
| OpenAlex | W7163563102 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 43 |
We propose an interactive approach to teaching Coulomb’s law and electrostatics in general, rooted in two complementary pedagogical methodologies: hyper-constructivism (H-C) and neo-realism. Unlike standard constructivism, our hyper-constructivist approach treats students’ prior ideas—even if incomplete or inconsistent—as essential “submerged logs” that teachers may use to guide students across the cognitive lake, toward the correct understanding. We implement a triadic model of cognitive didactics, balancing amusement (the ludic “hook”), formal teaching, and deepening scientific inquiry. Here, we present a hyper-constructivist path on electrostatics—Coulomb’s and Gauss’s laws. Through a sequential path of experiments involving plastic rods, “trained” aluminum cans, Volta’s electrophorus, and “Christmas” ornaments, we demonstrate how students can spontaneously formulate problems and bridge the gap between intuitive observations and complex effects of electrical polarization, going beyond the scholastic Coulomb’s law, via numerical modeling. The proposed interactive approach is rooted in phenomena-based learning and leverages discrepant events—surprising physical phenomena that challenge prior intuitions—as “ludic hooks” to trigger spontaneous inquiry and conceptual reconstruction. The main goal of our strategies is to trigger and develop young students’ interest in physics, which in many European countries is low. This method not only facilitates the acquisition of physical laws but also fosters “intellectual inquisitiveness” and social competencies, proving that well-rooted knowledge emerges from a synthesis of tangible experience and advanced scientific modeling. Our contribution constitutes a complex pedagogical proposal, iteratively developed and implemented in diverse didactical environments over several years. This paper presents a pedagogical proposal developed and refined through more than twenty years of educational practice. For teachers interested in implementing hyper-constructivist instruction, we provide a detailed teaching pathway on electrostatics, with didactical explanations and pedagogical notes
Cognition · Constructivist teaching methods · Physical law · Social constructivism · Teaching method · Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies · Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques · Science Education and Pedagogy
Learning How to Learn
The construction of reality in the child.
Apprenticeship in Thinking
Learning to Teach Argumentation
Attitudes towards science
Conceptual change
Spiral-curricular blended learning for the mathematical methods in physics education—A cross-modular interactive course
Persistence of Conceptual Errors in First-Year University Physics Course and Its Possible Relationship with Learning Styles
Interactive Games and Plays in Teaching Physics and Astronomy
Integration of Physics and Mathematics in STEM Education
How Constructivist Environment Changes Perception of Learning
How Multiple Representations Using Cyber–Physical System to Teach Rectilinear Motion Improves Learning and Creativity
Embodied Simulations of Forces of Nature and the Role of Energy in Physical Systems
Gamifying Physics Laboratory Work Increases Motivation and Enhances Acquisition of the Skills Required for Application of the Scientific Method
Those Who Understand
Collaborative Inquiry Learning
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |