A Systematic Review of the Literature on Maker Education and Teacher Training
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22048858 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Amaia Quintana-Ordorika (0000-0001-7745-0550, Department of Didactics and School Organization, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), 48940 Leioa, Spain), Urtza Garay Ruíz (0000-0001-7298-9274, Department of Didactics and School Organization, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), 48940 Leioa, Spain), Javier Portillo (0000-0002-0265-9277, Department of Didactics and School Organization, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), 48940 Leioa, Spain) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 12 |
| Pages | 1310 |
| Publication date | 2024-11-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Education Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2227-7102 • E-ISSN: 2227-7102 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/educsci14121310 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 43 |
This systematic review aims to analyse the existing research on the introduction of maker education in teacher training and continuous professional development. There is a growing interest in defining the state of the art on this topic. Using the WOS database, 20 empirical studies published in peer-reviewed journals between 2019 and 2023 were further analysed. The studies were systematically examined to identify the general characteristics related to the type of maker education training intervention. The principal findings of this review indicate that the majority of training programmes are primarily aimed at pre-service and in-service teachers, and the number of articles published has increased significantly in recent years; moreover, the characteristics of these programmes vary considerably across the studies identified, indicating an uneven distribution of research activity. Despite the growth in the literature, there is still a notable gap in terms of the specific knowledge acquisition that teachers require in order to effectively implement maker education. While many studies emphasise equipping educators with both practical skills and theoretical knowledge, fewer focus solely on knowledge acquisition. This review emphasises the value of immersive experiences for training teachers, demonstrating the positive impact such experiences can have on their confidence and mindset. Additionally, the potential of virtual training programmes to create collaborative, supportive learning environments represents an innovative approach to enhancing teacher preparation in maker education. Based on the findings, it must be emphasised that there is still a need for the further research and development of maker education training models specifically designed to facilitate the integration of making approaches into formal education
Expanding Participation in Inclusive Physical Education
Re-orienting science education in the generative AI era
Making technology education legitimate
“It looks like my die has a favorite number”—maker education for 21st century skills in primary science education
Characterizing the Foundations of School Makerspace Research and Preparing for the Future
The Maker Movement in Education
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
Funds of knowledge in making
Examining K–12 teacher learning in a makerspace through the activity–identity–community framework
Assessing learning in technology-rich maker activities
Bridging distance
Perceptions of teachers regarding the perceived implementation of creative pedagogy in “making” activities
Teaching & learning in makerspaces
Teaching Severe Weather
Promoting maker‐centred instruction through virtual professional development activities for K‐12 teachers in low‐income rural areas
Learning through Making and Maker Education
Maker-Centered Teacher Professional Development
Professional Development Considerations for Makerspace Leaders, Part One
Makers-in-Residence
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 5 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |