Predictors of primary school teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for inclusive education
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22162231 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Katja Franzen (Paderborn University, corresponding author), Barbara Moschner (0000-0002-3710-4757, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg), Frank Hellmich (0000-0003-0250-3069, Paderborn University) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Publication date | 2024-08-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2504-284X • E-ISSN: 2504-284X |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/feduc.2024.1437839 |
| OpenAlex | W4402019963 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 47 |
Introduction Teachers’ self-efficacy is considered to be an essential personal resource which underlies the successful implementation of inclusion. The development of self-efficacy is supposedly linked to four main sources: Mastery and vicarious experiences, verbal persuasion, and physiological and affective states. Notwithstanding the importance of high self-efficacy beliefs, only few studies consider the impact of the individual sources on inclusion-related efficacy beliefs and thereby point out possible ways to promote teachers’ self-efficacy. Methods Therefore, we investigated the effect of the assumed four sources on the basis of a sample of N = 355 teachers that work in ‘inclusive’ primary schools. Results Results from structural equation modeling highlight the importance of the supposed predictors of self-efficacy and in particular of teachers’ own experiences. Self-efficacy in turn proved to be a significant predictor of teachers’ willingness to implement inclusive education
Mathematics education · Persuasion · School teachers · Self-efficacy · Structural equation modeling · Computer Science · Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports · Psychology · Social Psychology · Teacher Education and Leadership Studies · Youth Development and Social Support
Predictors of teachers’ inclusive practices
Replicating the pathways to resilience
From Certainty to Doubts
Exploring variables related to teachers' self-efficacy in inclusive education
Relationship between school organizational climate and attitudes of Chinese general teachers toward inclusive education
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Measuring teacher efficacy to implement inclusive practices
The impact of nonnormality on full information maximum-likelihood estimation for structural equation models with missing data.
Teacher Efficacy Research 1998–2009
Teachers’ Beliefs About Inclusive Education and Insights on What Contributes to Those Beliefs
Reconceptualizing the Sources of Teaching Self-Efficacy
Structural equations modeling
The theory of planned behavior
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD)
The inclusive practices of classroom teachers
Regular primary schoolteachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education
Sources of Writing Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Elementary, Middle, and High School Students
Understanding inclusive education
Inclusion in Mexico
I can because I think I can
School environment and mastery experience as predictors of teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs towards inclusive teaching
Dealing with inclusion – teachers’ assessment of internal and external resources
Teachers' attitudes and self-efficacy on implementing inclusive education in Japan and Finland
Teacher attitudes and behavior toward the inclusion of children with social, emotional and behavioral difficulties in mainstream schools
Teachers' self-efficacy and the sources of efficacy
Predicting in-service educators' intentions to teach in inclusive classrooms in India and Australia
Teacher self-efficacy and inclusive education practices
Exploring teacher self-efficacy for inclusive practices in three diverse countries
Kompetent für einen inklusiven Unterricht
The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 5 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |