Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Improving partnerships to improve outcomes for children and young people with special educational needs and disabilities

Qualitative findings from a mixed methods systematic review

Bibliographic Data

ID22162658
AuthorsNatalie Tyldesley‐marshall (0000-0002-0576-3459, University of Warwick), Natalie Tyldesley-Marshall, Rebecca Johnson (0000-0002-2847-8298, University of Warwick), Janette Parr (0000-0002-0629-1596, University of Warwick), Anna Brown (0000-0001-6119-7925, University of Warwick), Iman Ghosh (0000-0002-7073-7468, University of Warwick), Amin Mehrabian (0000-0002-8879-7565, University of Warwick), Yi Fan Chen (0000-0002-9446-2761, University of Warwick), Amy Grove (0000-0002-8027-7274, University of Warwick, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume10
Publication date2025-02-19
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Education (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2504-284X • E-ISSN: 2504-284X
PublisherFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/feduc.2025.1513668
OpenAlexW4407744243
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited34

Background Effective collaboration between different services is recommended by government policy for children and young people (CYP) with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) across many countries. In the UK, despite significant shifts in policy towards partnership working, there remains a scarcity of scientific evidence on how this should be achieved. This mixed methods systematic review examined interventions leading to improved service outcomes for multiagency working for CYP with SEND. Method Eleven databases generated a total of 7,473 results. Data from 137 selected studies were analysed. However, only qualitative research findings from thematic synthesis regarding key ingredients of effective partnership are reported. Results From these, five key ingredients for effective partnership working in SEND services were identified: (1) participation, and legitimacy to participate in a partnership; (2) personalisation and consultation with children, young people, and their families in designing and delivering services; (3) respectful communication, and feeling that involvement is valued; (4) preparation to be an effective member of a partnership; and (5) working across professional and organisational boundaries. Conclusion and implications To facilitate practical application of the findings, three exemplar cases of effective partnership are explored. A framework to support partnership design, collaboration, and the development of evidence-based recommendations, is presented. Systematic review registration The study protocol for this study was registered in PROSPERO CRD42022352194

Medical education · Multimethodology · Pedagogy · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Special education · Special Educational Needs · Special needs · Child and Adolescent Health · Computer Science · Disability Education and Employment · Family and Disability Support Research · Medicine · Psychology

  • Transition Out of School for Autistic Young People

    Open Access•Norah Richards, Elizabeth Pellicano et al.•Review of Educational Research•2026

  • Studying complexity in health services research

    Open Access•Trisha Greenhalgh, Chrysanthi Papoutsi•BMC Medicine•2018

  • Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series—paper 3

    Open Access•Jane Noyes, Andrew Booth et al.•Journal of Clinical Epidemiology•2018

  • Better reporting of interventions

    Open Access•Tom Hoffmann, T C Hoffmann et al.•BMJ•2014

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Open Access•Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.•BMJ•2021

  • Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews

    Open Access•James Thomas, Angela Harden•BMC Medical Research Methodology•2008

  • Targeted faith-based and faith-placed interventions for noncommunicable disease prevention and control in low- and middle-income countries

    Open Access•Oluwakemi Ololade Odukoya, Gursimer Jeet et al.•Systematic Reviews•2022

  • Effective service provision and partnerships in service providers for children and young people with special educational needs and disabilities

    Open Access•Natalie Tyldesley‐marshall, Natalie Tyldesley-Marshall et al.•Frontiers in Education•2023

  • Social-Emotional Learning Interventions for Students With Special Educational Needs

    Open Access•Sepideh Hassani, Susanne Schwab•Frontiers in Education•2021

  • The lived experience of healthcare professionals working frontline during the 2003 Sars epidemic, 2009 H1N1 pandemic, 2012 Mers outbreak, and 2014 EVD epidemic

    Open Access•Erin R Chahley, Riley M Reel et al.•SSM - Qualitative Research in…•2021

  • Tinkering with responsive caring in disabled children's healthcare

    Open Access•Barbara E Gibson, Yani Hamdani et al.•SSM - Qualitative Research in…•2023

  • The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers

    Quan Nha Hong, Sergi Fàbregue et al.•Education for Information•2018

  • An Innovative Approach to Delivering a Family-Based Intervention to Address Parental Alcohol Misuse

    Open Access•Hayley Alderson, Andrea Mayrhofer et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • An inter-disciplinary perspective on evaluation of innovation to support care leavers’ transition

    Open Access•Amy Lynch, Hayley Alderson et al.•Journal of Children s Services•2021

  • Enhancing Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector

    Open Access•Eva Sørensen, Jacob Torfing•Administration & Society•2011

Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae