One year in the classroom with ChatGPT
Empirical insights and transformative impacts
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22166173 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Feng Guo (0000-0003-3584-154X, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, corresponding author), Tian Li (0000-0002-8281-4459), Tianrui Li (0000-0001-7780-104X, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga), Christopher J L Cunningham (0000-0001-6889-9962, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Publication date | 2025-05-27 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2504-284X • E-ISSN: 2504-284X |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/feduc.2025.1574477 |
| OpenAlex | W4410772574 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 153 |
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI), such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT, has rapidly emerged as a transformative tool in higher education, offering opportunities to enhance teaching and learning. This paper describes the design and implementation of ChatGPT-integrated curriculum activities, featuring coding learning in psychology and conceptual discussions in physics, and presents the findings of a year-long experimental study in both types of classrooms. Our findings suggest that students generally found ChatGPT easy to use and beneficial to their learning, reporting improved confidence, motivation, and engagement. However, its ability to address individual needs or replace instructors was viewed less favorably. Comparative analyses showed that coding activities in psychology led to higher levels of activity satisfaction and perceived usefulness of ChatGPT compared to the more abstract discussion activities in physics. While graduate students were more enthusiastic about using ChatGPT for skill acquisition than undergraduates, demographic factors such as gender, race, and first-generation college status showed no significant influence on such perceptions. Meanwhile, instructors’ reflections emphasize the importance of thoughtful integration, technical support, and pedagogical balance to maximize GAI’s potential while mitigating its limitations. Recommendations for integrating GAI into teaching practices and future research directions are discussed, contributing to the evolving discourse on GAI’s role in transforming modern classrooms
Data science · Empirical research · Mathematics education · Pedagogy · Statistics · Transformative learning · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Computer Science · COVID-19 diagnosis using AI · Machine Learning in Healthcare · Mathematics · Psychology
A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT
Students’ voices on generative AI
Collaborating with ChatGPT in argumentative writing classrooms
Promoting Self-Regulation Progress and Knowledge Construction in Blended Learning via ChatGPT-Based Learning Aid
Large language models in education
The effect of generative artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool use on students' computational thinking skills, programming self-efficacy and motivation
Analyzing the role of ChatGPT as a writing assistant at higher education level
A large-scale comparison of human-written versus ChatGPT-generated essays
Exploring Students’ Perceptions of ChatGPT
From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text
Impact of ChatGPT on learners in a L2 writing practicum
Reflection on whether Chat GPT should be banned by academia from the perspective of education and teaching
Transformative effects of ChatGPT on modern education
What if the devil is my guardian angel
Exploring University Students’ Adoption of ChatGPT Using the Diffusion of Innovation Theory and Sentiment Analysis With Gender Dimension
Testing the Ability of Teachers and Students to Differentiate between Essays Generated by ChatGPT and High School Students
Artificial Intelligence in studies—use of ChatGPT and AI-based tools among students in Germany
ChatGPT-3.5 as writing assistance in students’ essays
ChatGPT in didactical tetrahedron, does it make an exception? A case study in mathematics teaching and learning
Below average ChatGPT performance in medical microbiology exam compared to university students
ChatGPT, a brand-new tool to strengthen timeless competencies
Economics students’ behavioural intention and usage of ChatGPT in higher education
ChatGPT—A Challenging Tool for the University Professors in Their Teaching Practice
ChatGPT and Generative AI
Exploring Computer Science Students’ Perception of ChatGPT in Higher Education
The impact of Generative AI (GenAI) on practices, policies and research direction in education
Aladdin’s Genie or Pandora’s Box for Early Childhood Education? Experts Chat on the Roles, Challenges, and Developments of ChatGPT
ChatGPT for Automated Writing Evaluation in Scholarly Writing Instruction
A Preliminary Investigation of Fake Peer-Reviewed Citations and References Generated by ChatGPT
ChatGPT and its impact on research supervision
Examining students’ intention to use ChatGPT
Using leadership to leverage ChatGPT and artificial intelligence for undergraduate and postgraduate research supervision
Drivers and Consequences of ChatGPT Use in Higher Education
A literacia em saúde no ChatGPT
ChatGPT in medical school
ChatGPT and its ethical implications for STEM research and higher education
Toward non-human-centered design
Writing, creativity, and artificial intelligence. ChatGPT in the university context
ChatGPT
Public attitudes and sentiments toward ChatGPT in China
Use of ChatGPT in academia
Embracing the Disrupted Language Teaching and Learning Field
An Exploratory Study of EFL Learners' Use of ChatGPT for Language Learning Tasks
Densidade lexical em textos gerados pelo ChatGPT
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |