Making Each Unit Count
The Role of Discretizing Units in Quantity Expressions
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2237575 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Christophe Lembregts (0000-0002-5415-9063, Department of Marketing Management at Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, DR Rotterdam, corresponding author), Bram Van Den Bergh (0000-0003-2145-6077, Department of Marketing Management at Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, DR Rotterdam) |
| Editors | Gita Johar, Rajesh Bagchi |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 1051-1067 |
| Publication date | 2019-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Consumer Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0093-5301 • E-ISSN: 1537-5277 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/jcr/ucy036 |
| OpenAlex | W2796985867 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 62 |
Consumers typically infer greater quantity from larger numbers. For instance, a 500 gram box of chocolates appears heavier than a .5 kilogram box. By expressing quantities in alternative units or attribute dimensions, one can represent an otherwise identical quantity in a more versus less discretized manner (e.g., a box containing 25 chocolates vs. a box weighing 500 grams). Seven experimental studies show that a difference between more discretized quantities (e.g., 25 vs. 50 chocolates) appears larger relative to a difference between less discretized quantities (e.g., 500 grams vs. 1,000 grams), above and beyond effects of number magnitude. More discretized quantity expressions enhance the consumers’ ability to discriminate between choice options and can also nudge consumers to more favorable choices. Because more discretized quantities are more evaluable, expressing a quantity in terms of a collection of elements particularly helps individuals who are less numerically proficient. By identifying how discretization functions as a novel antecedent of evaluability and by distinguishing two different conceptualizations of numerosity (i.e., symbolic and perceptual numerosity), this article draws important connections between the numerical cognition literature and General Evaluability Theory.
Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Discretization · Mathematical analysis · Mathematical economics · Numerical cognition · Numerosity adaptation effect · Perception · Significant difference · Statistics · Applied Mathematics · Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills · Computer Science · Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences · Mathematics · Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques · Psychology · Social Psychology
How to Prevent Waiting Customers From Leaving
How to use advertising appeals to promote green purchase behaviour —The double-edged sword effect of a large usage-based scale frame
Portion size effects vary
The Scale Orientation Effect
Days-of-the-Week Effect in Temporal Judgments
Stars versus Bars
Experiential and Analytical Price Evaluations
Addition and subtraction by human infants
General Evaluability Theory
The Evaluability Hypothesis
The neural basis of the Weber–Fechner law
Numeracy and Decision Making
The affect heuristic
The Affect Heuristic
Preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of options
Choices, values, and frames
Development and Testing of an Abbreviated Numeracy Scale
Number; the Language of Science
How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction
Temporal Numerosity Discrimination
The Influence of Prior Beliefs, Frequency Cues, and Magnitude Cues on Consumers' Perceptions of Comparative Price Data
Meaningful Mediation Analysis
Numerosity and Consumer Behavior How to Make a 29% Increase Look Bigger
Are All Units Created Equal? The Effect of Default Units on Product Evaluations
The Countability Effect
Years, Months, and Days versus 1, 12, and 365
How to Make a 29% Increase Look Bigger
Illusionary Progress in Loyalty Programs
The Duration Heuristic
On the Perceived Value of Money
Attribute Evaluability and the Range Effect
The Effect of Discount Frequency and Depth on Consumer Price Judgments
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |