Does Featuring People with Disabilities Help or Hurt Fashion Marketing Effectiveness?
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23201548 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jiaqian Wang (0000-0001-7762-1110, National University of Singapore), Chuang Wei (0000-0002-5942-1307, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 62 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 582-600 |
| Publication date | 2025-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Marketing Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-2437 • E-ISSN: 1547-7193 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/00222437241309310 |
| OpenAlex | W4405286116 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 47 |
People with disabilities constitute 16% of the global population but seldom appear in fashion marketing communications. The limited campaigns featuring models with disabilities elicit mixed responses from consumers, and the extant literature also makes contradictory predictions about whether disability representation helps or hurts brands. Ten preregistered field and lab experiments (including four supplemental studies) examine the effect of disability representation on fashion marketing effectiveness. The authors find that featuring people with (vs. without) disabilities improves fashion marketing effectiveness (i.e., click-through rate of ads, brand attitudes, behavioral intent, brand choice) by boosting perceived brand warmth (i.e., worthy intentions) and coolness (i.e., appropriate deviation from norms). On top of mediation results, the studies provide process evidence by showing that the positive effect of featuring models with (vs. without) disabilities attenuates when disability representation is reactive (vs. proactive) or when the brand is a follower (vs. first mover) in adopting this practice. Additionally, the findings demonstrate that compared with plus-size representation, disability representation more effectively enhances marketing effectiveness, as well as brand warmth and coolness. This research offers theoretical and practical insights into disability representation and highlights the importance of nuanced investigations in understanding various diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives.
Business · Diversity (politics) · Extant taxon · Inclusion (mineral) · Political science · Population · Representation (politics) · Sociology · Cultural Industries and Urban Development · Fashion and Cultural Textiles · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Marketing · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology
The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Activities on Companies With Bad Reputations
Building Corporate Associations
Young Adults' Wishful Identification With Television Characters
Doing Better at Doing Good
The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior
Perceived Organizational Motives and Consumer Responses to Proactive and Reactive CSR
Children's wishful identification and parasocial interaction with favorite television characters
Brands as intentional agents framework
Social Identity Theory and the Organization
The role of wishful identification, emotional engagement, and parasocial relationships in repeated viewing of live-streaming games
Warmth and Competence as Universal Dimensions of Social Perception
Celebrity vs. Influencer endorsements in advertising
Interests, Relationships, Identities
Similarity, credibility, and attitude change
Fear, prejudice, and neglect
A model who looks like me
How Do Physical Disability Cues Influence Assumptions about Consumer Tastes? Unpacking the Disability Preference Stereotype
Narrative and Persuasion in Fashion Advertising
An attributional analysis of reactions to stigmas
Disability, stigma and deviance
Probable Cause
Beauty, Effort, and Misrepresentation
Hidden Barriers to Marketplace Disability Accessibility
It's Good to Be Different
Makeup Who You Are
What Makes Things Cool? How Autonomy Influences Perceived Coolness
The Underdog Effect
Nonprofits Are Seen as Warm and For-Profits as Competent
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |