Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Overriding Supreme Court Statutory Interpretation Decisions

Bibliographic Data

ID23330640
AuthorsWilliam N Eskridge (corresponding author)
Year1991
Volume101
Issue2
Pages331
Publication date1991-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Yale Law Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0044-0094 • E-ISSN: 1939-8611
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/796805
OpenAlexW122741503
LanguageEN
Citations received117

As if to debunk the conventional wisdom, the 101st Congress busied itself with efforts to override numerous Supreme Court decisions construing federal statutes. Successful legislation overrode eight recent opinions interpreting federal statutes. Overturning an older decision, another law for the first time rejected a Supreme Court interpretation discriminating against bisexuals, gay men, and lesbians. Even abortive override efforts in the 101st Congress illustrated Congress' attention to the Court's statutory interpretation cases. Most prominent among the unsuccessful override efforts was the vetoed Civil Rights Act of 1990, which would have overturned nine recent decisions narrowly construing Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes. A similar Civil Rights Act of 1991, however, was enacted into law by the 102d Congress.

Interpretation (philosophy) · Political science · Statutory interpretation · Statutory law · Supreme court · Supreme Court Decisions · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Legal Systems and Judicial Processes · Philosophy

  • Perils of Judicial Self-Government in Transitional Societies

    David Kosař•Perils of Judicial Self-Government…•2016

  • O Supremo Tribunal Federal

    Fernando Ramalho Ney Montenegro Bentes•2015

  • O Statutory Reversal como possibilidade de interpretação dialética das Constituições Federais

    Open Access•Tatiana Mareto Silva, Alexandre De Castro Coura•Revista Eletrônica Direito e…•2018

  • Contenção Judicial

    Open Access•Luciano Da Ros, Daniel Bogéa•Política & Sociedade•2023

  • The Major Questions Doctrine

    Open Access•K Ramanathan, Warren Snead•The Forum•2025

  • Las preferencias ideológicas y políticas judiciales

    Open Access•Santiago Basabe-Serrano, Santiago Basabe Serrano•AMÉRICA LATINA HOY•2008

  • Congressional Attacks on Supreme Court Rulings Involving Unconstitutional State Laws

    Open Access•James Meernik, Joseph Ignagni•Political Research Quarterly•1995

  • Culture And The Court

    Marcus Schulzke, Amanda Cortney Caroll•Cultural Studies•2014

  • Veto Players. How Political Institutions Work

    Open Access•Víctor Lapuente Giné•Revista Española de Investigaciones…•2003

  • Judicial Review and Coordinate Construction of the Constitution

    James Meernik, Joseph Ignagni•American Journal of Political…•1997

  • Measuring Political Preferences

    Lee Epstein, Carol Mershon•American Journal of Political…•1996

  • Measuring Issue Salience

    Lee Epstein, Jeffrey A Segal•American Journal of Political…•2000

  • Inviting Congressional Action

    Lori Hausegger, Lawrence Baum•American Journal of Political…•1999

  • The Supreme Court and Federal Administrative Agencies

    James F Spriggs•American Journal of Political…•1996

  • Change, Continuity, and the Evolution of the Law

    Open Access•Forrest Maltzman, Charles R Shipan•American Journal of Political…•2008

  • Common Law Bills of Rights as Dialogue between Courts and Legislatures

    Kent Roach•University of Toronto Law Journal•2005

  • On the Struggle for Judicial Supremacy

    Open Access•Jack Knight, Lee Epstein•Law & Society Review•1996

  • Jurisprudential Regimes in Supreme Court Decision Making

    Open Access•Mark J Richards, Herbert M Kritzer•American Political Science Review•2002

  • Why Are Japanese Judges So Conservative in Politically Charged Cases

    Open Access•J Mark Ramseyer•American Political Science Review•2001

  • Congressional Decision Making and the Separation of Powers

    Open Access•A D Martins, Andrew D Martin•American Political Science Review•2001

  • The Judicial Common Space

    Lee Epstein, A D Martins et al.•The Journal of Law Economics and…•2007

  • Congress and the Politics of Problem Solving

    Open Access•E Scott Adler, John D Wilkerson et al.•Congress and the Politics of…•2013

  • Designing Federalism

    Open Access•Mikhail Filippov, Михаил Филиппов et al.•Designing Federalism•2004

  • Polarization

    Nolan Mccarty•Polarization•2019

  • A positive theory of statutory interpretation

    Open Access•John Ferejohn, John A Ferejohn et al.•International Review of Law and…•1992

  • The Countermajoritarian Difficulty Revisited

    Open Access•Warren Snead, K Ramanathan•Perspectives on Politics•2026

  • The Judging Game

    Open Access•Leo Katz, Alvaro Sandroni•The Journal of Legal Studies•2025

  • Diving into Yeshiva's talk practices

    Open Access•Baruch B Schwarz, Zvi Bekerman et al.•Learning Culture and Social…•2019

  • Judicial Guardians

    Open Access•Lisa Hager, Alicia Uribe‐mcguire•Journal of Law and Courts•2024

  • Criticism from Below

    Open Access•Christopher P McMillion, Kevin Vance•Journal of Law and Courts•2017

  • The Supreme Court, the President, and Congress

    Open Access•Perry Mcd Collins, Matthew Eshbaugh-Soha•Journal of Law and Courts•2022

  • A Separation-of-Powers Approach to the Supreme Court’s Shrinking Caseload

    Open Access•Elizabeth A Lane•Journal of Law and Courts•2021

  • How the Supreme Court Alters Opinion Language to Evade Congressional Review

    Open Access•Ryan J Owens, Justin Wedeking et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2013

  • Ruling against the Executive in Amparo Cases

    Open Access•Lydia Brashear Tiede, Aldo F Ponce•Journal of Politics in Latin…•2011

  • The Judicialization of (Separation of Powers) Politics

    Open Access•Druscilla L Scribner•Journal of Politics in Latin…•2010

  • Evaluating Theories of Decision-making on the Peruvian Constitutional Tribunal

    Open Access•Lydia Brashear Tiede, Aldo F Ponce•Journal of Politics in Latin…•2014

  • Representing Public Opinion

    Open Access•Thomas R Marshall•Politics & Policy•2003

  • A Case for Supreme Court Term Limits? The Changing Ideological Relationship between Appointing Presidents and Supreme Court Justices

    Open Access•Hemant Sharma, Colin Glennon•Politics & Policy•2013

  • Preserving Institutional Power

    Open Access•Bryan W Marshall, Brett Curry et al.•Politics & Policy•2014

  • The Strategic Analysis of Judicial Decisions

    Open Access•Lee Epstein, Tonja Jacobi•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2010

  • Placing the Ball in Congress’ Court

    Open Access•Deborah Rice•American Politics Research•2018

  • The Role of Constitutional Features in Judicial Review

    Open Access•Adam R Brown•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2018

  • Judicial Institutions, Independence, and the Separation of Powers

    Open Access•Teena Wilhelm, David A Hughes•Political Research Quarterly•2026

  • Communicating the Politics of the Law

    Open Access•Albert H Rivero, Andrew Stones et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2026

  • The View of the Courts from the Hill

    Open Access•Mark Crispin Miller•PS Political Science & Politics•2007

  • Reassessing the role of the independent judiciary in enforcing interest-group bargains

    Open Access•Donald J Boudreaux, Adam C Pritchard•Constitutional Political Economy•1994

  • Strategies of Constitutional Scholarship

    Open Access•Eric A Posner•Law & Social Inquiry•2001

  • From Fundamental Law to Constitutional Politics– And Back

    Open Access•Howard Gillman•Law & Social Inquiry•1998

  • Covering Legal Mobilization

    Open Access•George I Lovell, Michael Mccann et al.•Law & Social Inquiry•2015

  • Reason for Hope? The Spotted Owl Injunctions and Policy Change

    Open Access•Brendon Swedlow•Law & Social Inquiry•2009

  • Public Choice and Judicial Review

    Open Access•Charles Silver•Law & Social Inquiry•1993

  • When “Best Practices” Win, Employees Lose

    Open Access•Linda H Krieger, Rachel Kahn Best et al.•Law & Social Inquiry•2015

  • (Re-)Setting the Scholarly Agenda on Transjudicial Communication

    Open Access•Ryan C Black, Lee Epstein•Law & Social Inquiry•2007

  • Of politics, self-preservation, and symbolism

    Open Access•Brett Curry, Trenton J Davis•The Social Science Journal•2014

  • Checking Presidential Detention Power in the War on Terror

    Open Access•Darren A Wheeler•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2009

  • An Informal and Limited Alliance”

    Open Access•Brett Curry, Brett W Curry et al.•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2008

  • Hybrid Constitutionalism

    Open Access•Eric C Ip•Hybrid Constitutionalism•2019

  • The Legislative Design of Judicial Review

    Open Access•Charles R Shipan•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2000

  • Explaining the Overruling of U.S. Supreme Court Precedent

    James F Spriggs, James F Spriggs James F Spriggs et al.•The Journal of Politics•2001

  • Do Political Preferences Change? A Longitudinal Study of U.S. Supreme Court Justices

    Lee Epstein, Valerie J Hoekstra et al.•The Journal of Politics•1998

  • Measuring Policy Content on the U.S. Supreme Court

    Kevin T Mcguire, Georg Vanberg et al.•The Journal of Politics•2009

  • Everyone’s Doing Congressional Historiography

    Open Access•Barry Friedman•Social Science History•2000

  • The decisional logic of treaty regime-making

    Open Access•Kevin L Cope•Public Choice•2025

  • Supreme Court consensus and dissent

    Open Access•Brian Goff•Public Choice•2006

  • Supreme Court consensus and dissent

    Open Access•Brian Goff•Public Choice•2005

  • How institutions structure judicial behaviour

    Lee Epstein•University of Toronto Law Journal•2019

  • On the Relationship between Public Opinion and Decision Making in the U.S. Courts of Appeals

    Open Access•Bryan Calvin, Perry Mcd Collins et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2010

  • Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999

    Open Access•A D Martins, Andrew D Martin et al.•Political Analysis•2002

  • Explaining the Incidence and Timing of Congressional Responses to the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Virginia A Hettinger, Christopher Zorn•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2005

  • An Analysis of Policy-Based Congressional Responses to the U.S. Supreme Court's Constitutional Decisions

    Open Access•Bethany Blackstone•Law & Society Review•2013

  • Political and constitutional overrides

    Open Access•Olof Larsson•Journal of European Public Policy•2021

  • The political foundations of judicial independence in the European Union

    R Daniel Kelemen•Journal of European Public Policy•2012

  • Keepers of the Covenant or Platonic Guardians? Decision Making on the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Richard L Pacelle, Bryan W Marshall et al.•American Politics Research•2007

  • Choices in Context

    Open Access•Brandon L Bartels•American Politics Research•2011

  • Tweeting Advice and Consent

    Open Access•Benjamin Burnley•Social Science Quarterly•2026

  • Judicial Independence and the Reality of Political Power

    Open Access•Gerald N Rosenberg, Gerald Rosenberg•The Review of Politics•1992

  • Jurisdiction Stripping

    Dawn M Chutkow•The Journal of Politics•2008

  • The Life of the Law

    Paul J Wahlbeck•The Journal of Politics•1997

  • Checking the Federal Courts

    Kirk A Randazzo, Richard W Waterman et al.•The Journal of Politics•2006

  • Attention to Issues in a System of Separated Powers

    Roy B Flemming, B Dan Wood et al.•The Journal of Politics•1999

  • Presidential Constraints on Supreme Court Decision-Making

    Paul J Gardner, Paul Gardner et al.•The Journal of Politics•2023

  • Ducking Trouble

    Anna Harvey, Barry Friedman•The Journal of Politics•2009

  • Nominating Commissions, Judicial Retention, and Forward-Looking Behavior on State Supreme Courts

    Open Access•Ryan J Owens, Alexander Tahk et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2015

  • Placing State Supreme Courts in State Politics

    Open Access•Paul Brace, Melinda Gann Hall et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2001

  • Not just about the ruling

    Andreu Rodilla•South European Society & Politics•2025

  • The Institutional Foundations of Supreme Court Power in Britain's Representative Democracy

    Eric C Ip•Representation•2013

  • Law clerks as an instrument of court–government accommodation under autocracy

    Ivan S Grigoriev•Post-Soviet Affairs•2018

  • Toward a Strategic Revolution in Judicial Politics

    Open Access•Lee Epstein, Jack Knight•Political Research Quarterly•2000

  • Institutions, Interests, and Judicial Outcomes

    Open Access•Brett Curry•Political Research Quarterly•2007

  • Opportunity and Overrides

    Open Access•Michael J Nelson, Alicia Uribe-Mcguire et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2017

  • Congress, the Supreme Court, and the Flag

    Open Access•John A Clark, Kevin T Mcguire•Political Research Quarterly•1996

  • Designing Tests of the Supreme Court and the Separation of Powers

    Open Access•Brian R Sala, James F Spriggs•Political Research Quarterly•2004

  • What Judges Want

    Lawrence Baum•Political Research Quarterly•1994

  • Culture and Legal Policy Punctuation in the Supreme Court's Gender Discrimination Cases

    Open Access•Rob Robinson•Policy Studies Journal•2014

  • Restraining the Court

    Open Access•Alyx Mark, Michael A Zilis•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2018

  • Judicial Procedures as Instruments of Political Control

    Open Access•Joseph L Smith•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2006

  • The Policymaking Role of State Supreme Courts in Education Policy

    Open Access•Teena Wilhelm•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2007

  • Modeling Supreme Court Strategic Decision Making

    Open Access•Mario Bergara, Barak D Richman et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2003

  • Pulling Punches

    Open Access•Anna Harvey, Barry Friedman•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2006

  • The political determinants of judicial dissent

    Open Access•Lydia Brashear Tiede•European Political Science Review•2016

Unique citing works117
Citations per year3,44
Citation span1992 - 2026 (35)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedYes
Citation typesNeutral: 97

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae