Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Toward a Strategic Revolution in Judicial Politics

A Look Back, A Look Ahead

Bibliographic Data

ID6340253
AuthorsLee Epstein (0000-0001-5120-9005), Jack Knight (0000-0002-0367-0785, University of Washington)
Year2000
Volume53
Issue3
Pages625-661
Publication date2000-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitical Research Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1065-9129 • E-ISSN: 1938-274X
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/106591290005300309
OpenAlexW1971827531
LanguageEN
Citations received78
References cited80

As papers presented at recent disciplinary conferences and articles published in major political science journals reveal, the field of judicial politics is undergoing a sea change. Variants of the social-psychological paradigm, which have long dominated thinking about law and courts, are giving way to approaches grounded in assumptions in rationality. More to the point, ever-growing numbers of scholars are now invoking the strategic account to understand judicial politics. In what follows, we investigate this “strategic revolution.” We begin by providing an intellectual history of the field, with special emphasis on why judicial specialists resisted strategic analysis for so long and why they are now (re)turning to it in ever-increasing numbers. Next, we consider the ways that analysts have begun to put the strategic account to work. This is an important task, for debates are already emerging over the “best” way to invoke the account to study judicial politics. We take the position that there is no one “right” way but rather four different approaches-all of which have the potential to provide us with important insights into law and courts

Discipline · Economics · Field (mathematics · Judicial activism · Judicial opinion · Law and economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Position (finance · Rationality · Sociology · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Legal Education and Practice Innovations · Public Administration

  • A Neo-Institutional Explanation of State Supreme Court Responses in Search and Seizure Cases

    Open Access•Scott A Comparato, Scott D Mcclurg•American Politics Research•2007

  • Departures From the Court

    Open Access•Kjersten R Nelson, Kjersten Nelson et al.•American Politics Research•2009

  • Strategic Selection of Legal Instruments on the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Chad M King•American Politics Research•2007

  • Importa el derecho?”. Política judicial, realismo jurídico y el problema de la indeterminación del derecho en tanto que problema metodológico

    Open Access•Pablo José Castillo Ortiz•Isegoría•2014

  • Judicial Institutions

    James L Gibson•The Oxford Handbook of Political…•2009

  • Law

    Open Access•Lauren B Edelman, Lauren Edelman et al.•International Encyclopedia of the…•2015

  • Judges beyond Politics in Democracy and Dictatorship

    Open Access•Lisa Hilbink•Judges Beyond Politics in…•2007

  • Beyond Constitutionalism

    Nico Krisch•Beyond Constitutionalism The…•2010

  • Courts under Constraints

    Open Access•Gretchen Helmke•Courts under Constraints•2004

  • Professional vs. non-professional labour judges

    Open Access•Alfonso Moral, Virginia Rosales et al.•International Review of Law and…•2021

  • Measuring the Countermajoritarian Nature of Supreme Court Decisions

    Open Access•Eugenia Artabe, Alex Badas•The Journal of Legal Studies•2023

  • Análisis Cualitativo Comparado

    Open Access•Josafat Cortez Salinas•Revista Mexicana de Sociología•2014

  • The Open Architecture of European Human Rights Law

    Open Access•Nico Krisch•Modern Law Review•2008

  • When Organizations Rule

    Lauren B Edelman, Linda H Krieger et al.•American Journal of Sociology•2011

  • Judicial Review in a Defective Democracy

    Open Access•Maoz Rosenthal, Gad Barzilai et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2021

  • A Separation-of-Powers Approach to the Supreme Court’s Shrinking Caseload

    Open Access•Elizabeth A Lane•Journal of Law and Courts•2021

  • The Czech Constitutional Court Database

    Open Access•Štěpán Paulík•Journal of Law and Courts•2024

  • Non-ideal theory of constitutional adjudication

    Open Access•Roni Mann•Global Constitutionalism•2018

  • Electoral Systems and Judicial Review in Developing Countries

    Open Access•Ernani Carvalho, Leon Victor De Queiroz Barbosa•Brazilian Political Science Review•2015

  • Democratizing U.S. Courts

    Open Access•Miles T Armaly, John M Bruce•Political Research Quarterly•2024

  • Courts and Horizontal Accountability in Hybrid Regimes

    Open Access•Maoz Rosenthal, Assaf Meydani•Political Research Quarterly•2025

  • When the Logics of Media, Law, and Politics Collide

    Open Access•Timo Harjuniemi, Maija Dahlberg et al.•The International Journal of…•2024

  • Glass Ceiling or Merit? Gender, Promotion, and Judicial Careers in a Civil Law System

    Open Access•Joan-Josep Vallbé, Joan‐Josep Vallbé et al.•Governance•2025

  • (Re-)Setting the Scholarly Agenda on Transjudicial Communication

    Open Access•Ryan C Black, Lee Epstein•Law & Social Inquiry•2007

  • When “Best Practices” Win, Employees Lose

    Open Access•Linda H Krieger, Rachel Kahn Best et al.•Law & Social Inquiry•2015

  • Ideology beyond partisanship

    Open Access•Andrés Pavón Mediano, Diego Carrasco•Government Information Quarterly•2019

  • Judicial review and territorial conflicts

    Open Access•Joan-Josep Vallbé, Daniel Cetrà et al.•European Journal of Political…•2025

  • Constructing victimhood at the Khmer Rouge Tribunal

    Open Access•Rachel Killean•International Review of Victimology•2018

  • Judicial Decision Making and International Tribunals

    Open Access•James Meernik, Kimi King et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2005

  • Gender, Internal Armed Conflict, and High Court Decision-Making in Transitioning Societies

    Open Access•Lee Demetrius Walker, Melissa Martinez et al.•International Studies Quarterly•2021

  • Power and Persuasion in Investment Treaty Interpretation

    Open Access•Anthea Roberts•American Journal of International…•2010

  • Clash of Paradigms

    Open Access•Anthea Roberts•American Journal of International…•2013

  • Judicial Activism in Perilous Times

    Open Access•Güneş Murat Tezcür•Law & Society Review•2009

  • Building the Bridge from Both Sides of the River

    Open Access•Lee Epstein, Jack Knight•Law & Society Review•2004

  • National Higher Courts and the Ratification of EU Treaties

    Carlos Closa•West European Politics•2013

  • The Realist Turn in Comparative Constitutional Politics

    Open Access•Ran Hirschl•Political Research Quarterly•2009

  • Doing Courts Justice? Studying Judicial Politics in Latin America

    Open Access•Diana Kapiszewski, Matthew M Taylor•Perspectives on Politics•2008

  • Unifying the field of comparative judicial politics

    Open Access•Arthur Dyevre•European Political Science Review•2010

  • Historical Institutionalism and Judicial Decision-Making

    Open Access•E Bleich•World Politics•2018

  • Modeling Motivations

    Gretchen Helmke, Mitchell S Sanders•The Journal of Politics•2006

  • Reasoning on the Threshold

    Eileen Braman•The Journal of Politics•2006

  • Federalism and Equality Rights Implementation in Canada

    Lawrence A White•Publius The Journal of Federalism•2014

  • The institutionalization of relative advantage

    Fabian Burkhardt•Post-Soviet Affairs•2017

  • Assessing the Applicability of Strategic Theory to Explain Decision Making on the Courts of Appeals

    Open Access•Jennifer Bowie, Jennifer Barnes Bowie et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2009

  • The New Judicial Politics of Legal Doctrine

    Jeffrey R Lax•Annual Review of Political Science•2011

  • Thesupremecourt Inamericanpolitics

    Lawrence Baum•Annual Review of Political Science•2003

  • Paths to the recognition of homo-parental adoptive rights in the EU-27

    Pablo José Castillo Ortiz, Iván Medina•Contemporary Politics•2016

  • The Role of Constitutional Courts in the Establishment and Maintenance of Democratic Systems of Government

    Open Access•Lee Epstein, Olga Shvetsova et al.•Law & Society Review•2001

  • Across the Sloping Meadow Floor

    Open Access•Joan-Josep Vallbé, Markus González-Beilfu et al.•Law & Society Review•2019

  • Splitting the Difference

    Open Access•Stefanie A Lindquist, Wendy L Martinek et al.•Law & Society Review•2007

  • A Social Movement Model for Judicial Behavior

    Open Access•Luiz Vilaça•Social Forces•2024

  • The theory of political coalitions.

    William H Riker•The theory of political coalitions.•1962

  • The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior

    Lawrence Baum•The puzzle of judicial behavior•1997

  • A Course in Microeconomic Theory

    David M Kreps•Course in Microeconomic Theory•1990

  • Judicial Partisanship and Obedience to Legal Doctrine

    Frank B Cross, Emerson H Tiller•The Yale Law Journal•1998

  • Congressional Control or Judicial Independence

    Open Access•Pablo T Spiller, Rafael Gely•The RAND Journal of Economics•1992

  • The Roosevelt Court

    C Herman Pritchett•Michigan Law Review•1948

  • Overriding Supreme Court Statutory Interpretation Decisions

    William N Eskridge•The Yale Law Journal•1991

  • A positive theory of statutory interpretation

    Open Access•John Ferejohn, John A Ferejohn et al.•International Review of Law and…•1992

  • Sophisticated voting and gate-keeping in the supreme court

    Gregory A Caldeira, G Caldeira•The Journal of Law Economics and…•1999

  • Beliefs, attitudes, and values

    Milton Rokeach•Beliefs, attitudes, and values•1968

  • An economic theory of democracy

    Anthony Downs•An economic theory of democracy•1985

  • Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance

    Open Access•Douglass C North•Institutions, Institutional…•1990

  • Cooperation under Anarchy

    Kenneth A Oye•Cooperation under Anarchy•1986

  • The Supreme Court as a Small Group

    E C Snyder, Elizabeth Snyder•Social Forces•1958

  • A Course in Microeconomic Theory

    Open Access•David M Kreps•Course in Microeconomic Theory•2020

  • Comparative Politics and Rational Choice

    Open Access•Robert H Bates•American Political Science Review•1997

  • Frontiers of Judicial Research

    Francis D Wormuth, Joel B Grossman et al.•The Western Political Quarterly•1969

  • The Study of Public Law

    R H Clark, Walter F Murphy et al.•The Western Political Quarterly•1972

  • Stare Decisis, Dissent, and the Background of the Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States

    John R Schmidhauser•University of Toronto Law Journal•1962

  • Congress and the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Harold M Bowman•Political Science Quarterly•1910

  • Personal Attribute Models of the Voting Behavior of U.S. Supreme Court Justices

    Open Access•C Neal Tate•American Political Science Review•1981

  • A Survey Study of Hawaiian Judges

    Open Access•Theodore L Becker•American Political Science Review•1966

  • Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices Revisited

    Jeffrey A Segal, Lee Epstein et al.•The Journal of Politics•1995

  • Role Perceptions and Behavior in Three U.S. Courts of Appeals

    John W Howard, J Woodford Howard J Woodford Howard•The Journal of Politics•1977

  • Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Gregory A Caldeira, John Wright et al.•American Political Science Review•1988

  • The Game Theory of International Politics

    Open Access•Duncan Snidal•World Politics•1985

  • An Empirical Test of the Rational-Actor Theory of Litigation

    Donald R Songer, Charles M Cameron et al.•The Journal of Politics•1995

  • Electoral Politics and Strategic Voting in State Supreme Courts

    Melinda Gann Hall•The Journal of Politics•1992

  • "Thick Rationality and the Missing "Brute Fact

    Albert S Yee•The Journal of Politics•1997

  • Public Law and Judicial Behavior

    C Herman Pritchett•The Journal of Politics•1968

  • Role Theory and the Supreme Court

    Dorothy B James, Dorothy James•The Journal of Politics•1968

  • Toward a Theory of Sub-Group Formation in the United States Supreme Court

    Sidney Ulmer, S Sidney Ulmer•The Journal of Politics•1965

  • Dissent Behavior and the Social Background of Supreme Court Justices

    Sidney Ulmer, S Sidney Ulmer•The Journal of Politics•1970

  • Supreme Court Justices as Strategic Decision Makers

    Robert L Boucher, Robert L Boucher Robert L Boucher et al.•The Journal of Politics•1995

  • Constituent Influence in State Supreme Courts

    Melinda Gann Hall•The Journal of Politics•1987

  • Law-Making in the State Judiciary

    Henry Robert Glick, Kenneth N Vines•Polity•1969

  • What Judges Want

    Lawrence Baum•Political Research Quarterly•1994

  • The Supreme Court and Federal Administrative Agencies

    James F Spriggs•American Journal of Political…•1996

  • Behavioral Tendencies in the Three-Judge District Court

    Thomas G Walker, Tom Walker•American Journal of Political…•1973

  • Marshalling the Court

    Paul J Wahlbeck, James F Spriggs et al.•American Journal of Political…•1998

  • Fluidity on the United States Supreme Court

    Saul Brenner•American Journal of Political…•1980

  • Time Binding and Theory Building in Personal Attribute Models of Supreme Court Voting Behavior, 1916-88

    C Neal Tate, Roger Handberg•American Journal of Political…•1991

  • The Hierarchy of Justice

    Donald R Songer, Jeffrey A Segal et al.•American Journal of Political…•1994

  • May It Please the Chief? Opinion Assignments in the Rehnquist Court

    Forrest Maltzman, Paul J Wahlbeck•American Journal of Political…•1996

  • Social Background as an Indicator to the Votes of Supreme Court Justices in Criminal Cases

    Sidney Ulmer, S Sidney Ulmer•American Journal of Political…•1973

  • On the Struggle for Judicial Supremacy

    Open Access•Jack Knight, Lee Epstein•Law & Society Review•1996

  • Judicial Role Perceptions

    Open Access•Thomas D Ungs, Larry R Baas•Law & Society Review•1972

  • Are Social Background Models Time-Bound

    Open Access•Sidney Ulmer, S Sidney Ulmer•American Political Science Review•1986

  • Constitutional Law in 1927-1928

    Open Access•Robert E Cushman•American Political Science Review•1929

  • Political Jurisprudence, the "New Institutionalism," and the Future of Public Law

    Open Access•R M Smith•American Political Science Review•1988

  • On the Nature of Supreme Court Decision Making

    Open Access•Tracey E George, Lee Epstein•American Political Science Review•1992

  • The Study of Judicial Decision-Making as an Aspect of Political Behavior

    Open Access•Glendon A Schubert, Glendon Schubert•American Political Science Review•1958

  • Separation-of-Powers Games in the Positive Theory of Congress and Courts

    Open Access•Jeffrey A Segal•American Political Science Review•1997

  • Strategic Policy Considerations and Voting Fluidity on the Burger Court

    Open Access•Forrest Maltzman, Paul J Wahlbeck•American Political Science Review•1996

  • Voting Behavior on the United States Courts of Appeals, 1961-1964

    Open Access•Sheldon Goldman•American Political Science Review•1966

  • The 1960 Term of the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Glendon Schubert•American Political Science Review•1962

  • Political Orientations, Social Backgrounds, and Role Perceptions of State Supreme Court Judges

    John T Wold•The Western Political Quarterly•1974

  • Order in the Courts

    Melinda Gann Hall, Paul Brace•The Western Political Quarterly•1989

  • Judges' Role Orientations, Attitudes, and Decisions

    Open Access•James L Gibson•American Political Science Review•1978

  • A Method for Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System

    Open Access•L S Shapley, Martin Shubik•American Political Science Review•1954

Unique citing works51
Citations per year3,12
Citation span2001 - 2025 (25)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 74

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae