Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Supreme Court and Federal Administrative Agencies

A Resource-Based Theory and Analysis of Judicial Impact

Bibliographic Data

ID6232369
AuthorsJames F Spriggs (corresponding author)
Year1996
Volume40
Issue4
Pages1122
Publication date1996-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0092-5853 • E-ISSN: 1540-5907
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2111745
OpenAlexW2322561863
LanguageEN
Citations received53
References cited29

Theorv: Government bureaucracies are strategic and implement Supreme Court opinions based upon the costs and benefits of alternative policy choices. Agencies develop these expectations from prevailing resource environments and bureaucracies are more likely to establish larger policy change when resources favor the Court because the costs of not changing their policies appear larger. Hypotheses: The amount of bureaucratic policy change due to Court opinions is a function of: (1) attributes of Supreme Court opinions-specificity of Court-ordered policy change, basis of opinions, remands, and dissents; (2) agency characteristics-policy preferences, type of proceedings, and time preferences; and (3) external actors-amicus curiae, opposing litigants, Congress, and presidents. Methods: An Ordered Probit analysis tests a multivariate model of the impact of every Supreme Court opinion reversing or remanding a federal agency decision from the 1953 through 1990 terms. Results: Agency policy change after Court opinions is influenced by the specificity of Supreme Court opinions, agency policy preferences, agency age, and amicus curiae support

Administrative law · Agency (philosophy · Bureaucracy · Certiorari · Economics · Government (linguistics · Majority opinion · Original jurisdiction · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Supreme court · Supreme Court Decisions · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Public Administration

  • Politics, Delegation, and Bureaucracy

    John D Huber, Charles R Shipan•The Oxford handbook of political…•2009

  • Cognitive Decline on the Bench

    Open Access•Mikel Norris•Behavioral Sciences & the Law•2026

  • The Headless Fourth Branch

    Open Access•Jennifer L Selin•Perspectives on Public Management…•2020

  • The Burden of Proof in Immigration Bond Decisions

    Open Access•Anthony J Demattee, Hallie Ludsin et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2025

  • The Implementation of Supreme Court Precedent

    Open Access•Ethan D Boldt, Michael C Gizzi•Journal of Law and Courts•2018

  • Intracourt Dialogue

    Open Access•Pamela C Corley, Artemus Ward•Journal of Law and Courts•2020

  • Judicial Impact and Factual Allegations

    Open Access•Morgan L W Hazelton•Journal of Law and Courts•2020

  • Strategic Opinion Language on the US Courts of Appeals

    Open Access•Joshua Boston•Journal of Law and Courts•2020

  • Judicial behavior in disability cases

    Christina L Boyd, Adam G Rutkowski•Politics Groups and Identities•2020

  • Litigation, Courts, and Bureaucratic Policy

    Open Access•Robert M Howard•American Politics Research•2002

  • Experts Judging Experts

    Open Access•Banks Miller, Brett Curry•Law & Social Inquiry•2012

  • When justice answers to the president

    Open Access•Joshua Holzer•The Social Science Journal•2019

  • The President, the Court, and Policy Implementation

    Open Access•Sharece Thrower•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2016

  • Legislative-Judicial Relations

    Georg Vanberg•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • What Drives the Voting on Abortion Policy? Investigating Partisanship and Religion in the State Legislative Arena

    David L Schecter, David Schecter•Women & Politics•2001

  • Explaining legal inconsistency

    Open Access•Jbrandon Duck-Mayr•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2022

  • The Impact of Courts on Public Management

    Open Access•Andrew Osorio, Rosemary O’leary•Administration & Society•2017

  • Bargaining on the U.S. Supreme Court

    James F Spriggs, Forrest Maltzman et al.•The Journal of Politics•1999

  • Why courts are the life buoys of migrant rights

    Open Access•Natascha Zaun, Martin Leroch et al.•Journal of European Public Policy•2024

  • How do institutional constraints affect judicial decision-making? The European Court of Justice’s French language mandate

    Open Access•Sivaram Cheruvu•European Union Politics•2019

  • Directing Compliance? Remedial Approach and Compliance with European Court of Human Rights Judgments

    Open Access•Øyvind Stiansen•British Journal of Political…•2021

  • Justices and Legal Clarity

    Open Access•Ryan J Owens, Justin Wedeking et al.•Law & Society Review•2011

  • The U.S. Supreme Court's Incorporation and Interpretation of Precedent

    Open Access•James F Spriggs, Thomas G Hansford•Law & Society Review•2002

  • Explaining the Overruling of U.S. Supreme Court Precedent

    James F Spriggs, James F Spriggs James F Spriggs et al.•The Journal of Politics•2001

  • Lobbyists before the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Perry Mcd Collins, Paul M Collins•Political Research Quarterly•2007

  • Courting the Public

    James R Zink, James F Spriggs et al.•The Journal of Politics•2009

  • The Life of the Law

    Paul J Wahlbeck•The Journal of Politics•1997

  • Strategic Delay and the Use of Incompatibility Rulings at the German Constitutional Court

    Jay N Krehbiel•The Journal of Politics•2021

  • Executive Discretion, Judicial Decision Making, and Separation of Powers in the United States

    Clifford J Carrubba, Christopher Zorn•The Journal of Politics•2010

  • Judicial Deference and Executive Control Over Administrative Agencies

    Open Access•Gbemende Johnson•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2014

  • Toward a Strategic Revolution in Judicial Politics

    Open Access•Lee Epstein, Jack Knight•Political Research Quarterly•2000

  • Regional Court Influence Over Bureaucratic Policymaking

    Open Access•Robert M Howard, David C Nixon•Political Research Quarterly•2002

  • Measuring Legal Change

    James F Spriggs, Thomas G Hansford•Political Research Quarterly•2000

  • Presidential Success on the Substance of Legislation

    Open Access•A W Barrett, Matthew Eshbaugh-Soha•Political Research Quarterly•2007

  • Explaining Federal Bureaucratic Compliance with Supreme Court Opinions

    Open Access•James F Spriggs•Political Research Quarterly•1997

  • The Heat is On

    Open Access•Christine C Bird, Brooke N Shannon•Political Research Quarterly•2024

  • Amicus Curiae and the Role of Information at the Supreme Court

    James F Spriggs, Paul J Wahlbeck•Political Research Quarterly•1997

  • Bureaucratic Leverage over Policy Choice

    Open Access•Junseok Kim, Brian J Gerber et al.•Policy Studies Journal•2005

  • Ambiguous Statutes and Judicial Deference To Federal Agencies

    Open Access•John Wright, John R Wright•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2010

  • Anticipated Adjudication

    Open Access•Scott Limbocker, William G Resh et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2022

  • Domestic Judicial Institutions and Human Rights Treaty Violation

    Open Access•Emilia Justyna Powell, Jeffrey K Staton•International Studies Quarterly•2009

  • Judicial Policy Implementation in Mexico City and Merida

    Jeffrey K Staton•Comparative Politics•2004

  • The Value of Vagueness

    Open Access•Jeffrey K Staton, Georg Vanberg•American Journal of Political…•2008

  • Marshalling the Court

    Paul J Wahlbeck, James F Spriggs et al.•American Journal of Political…•1998

  • Bureaucratic Responsiveness to LGBT Americans

    Open Access•Kenneth Lowande, A Proctor•American Journal of Political…•2020

  • Measuring and Explaining Political Sophistication through Textual Complexity

    Open Access•Kenneth Benoit, Kevin Munger et al.•American Journal of Political…•2019

  • Overcoming apartheid

    Open Access•James L Gibson•The Annals of the American…•2006

  • Adjudicatory Oversight and Judicial Decision Making in Executive Branch Agencies

    Open Access•Christina L Boyd, Amanda Driscoll•American Politics Research•2013

  • Ghostwriters on the Court

    Open Access•Paul J Wahlbeck, James F Spriggs et al.•American Politics Research•2002

  • The Precedent That Wasn't

    Open Access•Jon B Gould•Law & Society Review•2001

  • Collisions at the Intersection of Gender, Race, and Class

    Open Access•Kitty Calavita•Law & Society Review•2006

  • The (Dis)Advantage of Certainty

    Open Access•Pamela C Corley, Justin Wedeking•Law & Society Review•2014

  • Strategic Policy Considerations and Voting Fluidity on the Burger Court

    Open Access•Forrest Maltzman, Paul J Wahlbeck•American Political Science Review•1996

  • The impact of the United States Supreme Court

    Stephen L Wasby•The impact of the United States…•1970

  • Content analysis

    Klaus Krippendorff•Content analysis•1980

  • Judicial policies

    Bradley C Canon, Charles A Johnson•Judicial policies•1999

  • The New Deal Lawyers

    Peter H Irons, Peter Irons•New Deal Lawyers•2020

  • Elements of Econometrics

    Jan Kmenta•Elements of econometrics•1997

  • Institutions and Social Conflict

    Open Access•Jack Knight•Institutions and Social Conflict•1992

  • Overriding Supreme Court Statutory Interpretation Decisions

    William N Eskridge•The Yale Law Journal•1991

  • The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data

    J R Landis, Gary G Koch•Biometrics•1977

  • Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance

    Open Access•Douglass C North•Institutions, Institutional…•1990

  • Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics

    G S Maddala•Limited-Dependent and Qualitative…•1983

  • Implementation of Civil Rights Policy

    Open Access•Don Brown, Charles S Bullock et al.•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•1984

  • Politics, Programs and Bureaucrats

    Open Access•Barry Bozeman, William P Browne•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•1981

  • Judicial Decisions and Organizational Change

    Open Access•Charles A Johnson•Administration & Society•1979

  • Administrative Law

    Open Access•Francis E Rourke•Political Science Quarterly•1991

  • Prayer in the Public Schools

    Open Access•Leo Pfeffer•Political Science Quarterly•1969

  • A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables

    Richard D Mckelvey, William Zavoina•Journal of Mathematical Sociology•1975

  • The Hollow Hope

    Gerald N Rosenberg•The Hollow Hope•1993

  • The Life of the Law

    Paul J Wahlbeck•The Journal of Politics•1997

  • Mass-Level Compliance with Public Policy

    Michael W Giles, Douglas S Gatlin•The Journal of Politics•1980

  • Regulatory Performance and Presidential Administration

    Terry M Moe•American Journal of Political…•1982

  • The Hierarchy of Justice

    Donald R Songer, Jeffrey A Segal et al.•American Journal of Political…•1994

  • Weighted kappa

    Jacob Cohen•Psychological Bulletin•1968

  • Law, Politics, and Judicial Decision Making

    Open Access•Charles A Johnson•Law & Society Review•1987

  • Why the "Haves" Come Out Ahead

    Open Access•M Galanter•Law & Society Review•1974

  • Toward and Beyond a Theory of Supreme Court Impact

    Open Access•James P Levine, Theodore L Becker•American Behavioral Scientist•1970

  • Administrative Agencies and the Court

    Reginald S Sheehan•The Western Political Quarterly•1990

  • The School Prayer Decisions

    Donald R Ploch, Kenneth M Dolbeare et al.•Journal for the Scientific Study…•1972

Unique citing works53
Citations per year1,77
Citation span1996 - 2026 (31)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 53

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae