Sex Segregation in the Blue-collar Occupations
Women's Choices or Unremedied Discrimination
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2367367 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Barbara R Bergmann (0000-0001-5035-709X, American University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 88-93 |
| Publication date | 2011-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Gender & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0891-2432 • E-ISSN: 1552-3977 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0891243210389813 |
| OpenAlex | W2126868842 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 25 |
| References cited | 13 |
In discussing why women have failed to gain much of a foothold in certain male-dominated occupations, some commentators attribute the outcome to the characteristics of the women themselves—their lack of desire to enter or lack of ability to perform in those jobs. They do not put much emphasis on what those who might have been resisting women’s entry—employers, male coworkers, unions—have been up to, and they feel no need to talk about remedies that might be brought to bear by government. Indeed, the implicit message is that no remedy is necessary because no harm has been done. The women got what they wanted, or rather, did not bother to get what they did not want. Paula England, judging by her recent diagnosis of the cause of continuing sex segregation in occupations that do not require college, seems to have signed up with that camp. Her explanation of the failure of women to enter blue-collar male-dominated occupations depends almost entirely on lack of motivation on the part of those women who might have entered. Her attention to any who might have opposed and prevented that entry is limited to a single sentence in a footnote (England 2010, 163). England’s explana-tion of the difference in outcomes in the professions and the blue-collar jobs is that women have wanted two things: (1) They wanted to do better than their mothers, and (2) they wanted to work in occupations that are historically female dominated because such occupations are thought to be particularly suited to women’s essential nature and women feel they can express their femininity by working in them. The women who became physicians, lawyers, and business executives could not do both because, England tells us, their mothers already had the highest-class feminine-typed
Blue collar · Collar · Demographic economics · Economics · Labour economics · Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics · Migration and Labor Dynamics · Psychology · Work-Family Balance Challenges
Gender Segregation in Work
Gender Essentialism at Work? The Case of Norwegian Childcare Workers
The Determinants of Countercyclical Job Satisfaction in the Public Sector
Occupational Prestige and Fathers’ Influence on Sons and Daughters
The gendered impacts of ridesharing in Brazil
Occupational Gender Segregation, Globalization, and Gender Earnings Inequality in U.S. Metropolitan Areas
The Persistence of Workplace Gender Segregation in the US
Why is the gender revolution uneven and stalled? Gender essentialism and men's movement into ‘women's work
Maping gendered social closure mechanisms through examination of seven male‐dominated occupations
Intersections on the Class Escalator
The 1990s Shift in the Media Portrayal of Working Mothers
Qualitatively Derived Definitions of Emotional Infidelity Among Professional Women in Cross-Gender Relationships
Beyond tokenism
Man Up, Man Down
Gender, the Labor Process and Dignity at Work
Marginalized by race and place
Opting Out and Leaning In
Manufacturing Gender Inequality in the New Economy
Racism, racialization, and health equity in Canadian residential long term care
Women in the One Percent
Women's Low Employment Rates in India
The Gender Mobility Paradox
Women in Blue
Attrition from Male-dominated Occupations
Is healthcare the new manufacturing
Working Construction
Selling Women Short
The Economic Emergence of Women
Gender Stereotypes, Same-Gender Preferences, and Organizational Variation in the Hiring of Women
Reconsidering Culture and Poverty
Bringing Intergenerational Social Mobility Research into the Twenty-first Century
Live Wire
In Defense of Affirmative Action
How Long Is the Second (Plus First) Shift? Gender Differences in Paid, Unpaid, and Total Work Time in Australia and the United States
The Gender Revolution
Autonomy, Dependence, or Display? The Relationship Between Married Women's Earnings and Housework
Dependence within families and the division of labor
When Does Gender Trump Money? Bargaining and Time in Household Work
| Unique citing works | 25 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,79 |
| Citation span | 2012 - 2025 (14) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 25 |