Powered by (discrete) emotions? The consequences of affective polarization for self-censorship and outgroup silencing
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24227465 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Luna Laufer (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München), Laura Gerstner (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München), Pia Kinzler (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München), Julia Stockwald (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München), Anna-Luisa Sacher (0000-0002-3386-4310, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München), Carsten Reinemann (0000-0001-9715-8434, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | 1-22 |
| Publication date | 2026-10-08 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | European Journal of Political Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0304-4130 • E-ISSN: 1475-6765 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s147567652610190x |
| OpenAlex | W7220986668 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 86 |
Amid ongoing debates about political polarization in Western Democracies, this study investigates the role of affective polarization in the context of practices related to political discourse. In doing so, it moves beyond generalized affective polarization and delves into discrete negative emotions (fear, disgust, and anger), examining how they relate to the willingness to engage in self-censorship and the belief in the importance of silencing others, i.e., the respective political outgroup. Findings from a quota-based online survey conducted in autumn 2024 in Germany ( N = 1,918) reveal that the effects of affective polarization vary depending on the underlying emotion: fear of the political outgroup is linked to an increased willingness to self-censor. In contrast, anger is associated with a reduced willingness to self-censor, while all three negative emotions are connected to a higher belief in the importance to silence the political outgroup. These results underscore the critical role of discrete emotions in affective polarization, offering nuanced insights that extend beyond generalized dislike. In addition, they provide valuable insights into how affective polarization may threaten democratic values.
affective polarization · Anger · democratic values · Disgust · Fear · negative emotions · political discourse · political polarization · self-censorship · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Media and Politics
The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
American Affective Polarization in Comparative Perspective
Why Washington Won't Work
Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations
Are there basic emotions?
Deviance and Dissent in Groups
Beyond valence
Polarisation and Silencing Others During the Covid-19 Pandemic in Germany
Putting the affect into affective polarisation
Hearing the Other Side
Cross-Country Trends in Affective Polarization
The Impact of Affective Polarization on Political Participation
Intergroup threat and affective polarization in a multi-party system
Meinungsfreiheit in Gefahr? Wie politische Einstellungen und individuelle Erfahrungen die Wahrnehmung der Meinungsfreiheit in Deutschland prägen
Is Protest Only Negative? Examining the Effect of Emotions and Affective Polarization on Protest Behaviour
How Affective Polarization Shapes Americans’ Political Beliefs
This is why we can’t have nice things
Validating the Willingness to Self-Censor Scale II
Seeing Red or Feeling Blue
Polarizing Communication as Media Effects on Antagonists. Understanding Communication in Conflicts in Digital Media Societies1
Silencing Fellow Citizens
Willingness to Self-Censor
Validating the Willingness to Self-Censor Scale
Personality Factors Differentiating Selective Approach, Selective Avoidance, and the Belief in the Importance of Silencing Others
Affective polarization in Europe
Fear and loathing across party lines’ (also) in Europe
The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. elections in the 21st century
Trends in Political Science Research
Does affective polarisation increase turnout? Evidence from Germany, The Netherlands and Spain
Election Night’s Alright for Fighting
Affective Polarization in Multiparty Systems? Comparing Affective Polarization Towards Voters and Parties in Norway and the United States
How Affective Polarization Undermines Support for Democratic Norms
In-Party Love, Out-Party Hate, and Affective Polarization in Twelve Established Democracies
Affective Polarization in Comparative and Longitudinal Perspective
Ideologues without Issues
What Do We Measure When We Measure Affective Polarization
Self‐Censorship as a Socio‐Political‐Psychological Phenomenon
We love, they hate
The Strengthening of Partisan Affect
Can Interparty Contact Reduce Affective Polarization? A Systematic Test of Different Forms of Intergroup Contact
Efficacy, Emotions and the Habit of Participation
Conflict Avoidance and Gender Gaps in Political Engagement
Consequences of affective polarization
The relationship between affective polarization and democratic backsliding
Does Affective Polarization Undermine Democratic Norms or Accountability? Maybe Not
Fear and Loathing across Party Lines
The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation
Divided by the Vote
Intergroup emotions
Different Emotional Reactions to Different Groups
The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States
Affect, Not Ideology
Does Affective Polarization Contribute to Democratic Backsliding in America
Toward a Theory of Pernicious Polarization and How It Harms Democracies
Affective polarization in multiparty systems
Social trust and affective polarization in Spain (2014-19)
Vertical vs horizontal affective polarization
Interventions reducing affective polarization do not necessarily improve anti-democratic attitudes
Keeping Your Mouth Shut
The poles in polarization
Polarisation, identity and affect - conceptualising affective polarisation in multi-party systems
How Empathic Concern Fuels Political Polarization
Partisan Affect in Times of Fractionalization
Resentment Is Like Drinking Poison? The Heterogeneous Health Effects of Affective Polarization
| Highly cited | No |
|---|