Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Does Affective Polarization Contribute to Democratic Backsliding in America

Bibliographic Data

ID5741977
AuthorsJames N Druckman (0000-0002-1249-6790, corresponding author), Donald P Green (0000-0002-8850-438X), Sharad Iyengar (0000-0003-2406-719X), Shanto Iyengar
Year2023
Volume708
Issue1
Pages137-163
Publication date2023-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-7162 • E-ISSN: 1552-3349
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/00027162241228952
OpenAlexW4392999489
LanguageEN
Citations received24
References cited127

A notable development in 21st-century American politics is the rise of affective polarization: partisans increasingly dislike and distrust those affiliated with the other political party. We offer a wide-ranging review of the nature of party identification; the factors that contribute to affective polarization; and the consequences of this kind of polarization on electoral politics, democratic transgressions, and democratic functioning. We conclude that there is scant evidence of a direct link between affective polarization and democratic backsliding in the U.S., and we argue that understanding the erosion of democratic norms and institutions means that we should consider a wider range of potential causal factors among elites and the general citizenry. Affective polarization has likely made democratic functioning more difficult, though, so interventions to address it are worthwhile: these should focus on core causes rather than on behavioral symptoms

Democracy · Development economics · Distrust · Economics · Polarization (electrochemistry) · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Psychiatry · Psychological intervention · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology

  • Beneath consensus

    Open Access•Ester Fanelli•Social Forces•2026

  • Measuring affective polarization

    Open Access•James N Druckman, Samara Klar et al.•Political Psychology•2026

  • Affective polarization and the support for populist and technocratic governance

    Open Access•Engler, Ivo Bantel et al.•Party Politics•2026

  • Partisan Homogeneity Does Not Increase Collaborative Corruption

    Open Access•Michael Jankowski, Florian Erlbruch et al.•Journal of Experimental Political…•2025

  • Digital Drivers of Autocratisation

    Open Access•Anita Breuer•Journal of Politics in Latin…•2025

  • Polarization and Partitioning Representation

    Open Access•Hanno Scholtz•Sociology Compass•2024

  • Can Deliberative Democracy Provide Remedies for Affective Polarisation

    Open Access•Maija Setälä, Ian O’flynn•Political Studies Review•2024

  • Contingent Confidence

    Open Access•Joshua D Clinton•PS Political Science & Politics•2025

  • The political communication of polarizing leaders. Evidence from Italy

    Claudia Mariotti, Anna Stanziano•Contemporary Italian Politics•2024

  • Canadian Policy Responses to Artificial Intelligence–Generated Threats to Democratic Elections

    Chris Tenove, Heidi J S Tworek et al.•Canadian Public Policy•2026

  • Conforming to Deviate

    Open Access•Sofia Mumma•Political Behavior•2026

  • Partisan (In)Tolerance and Affective Polarization

    Open Access•James Tilley, Teresa Bejan et al.•British Journal of Political…•2024

  • To polarize or not to polarize? Unveiling 2024 European election communication strategies

    Open Access•Claudia Mariotti, Anna Stanziano•European Journal of Communication•2025

  • Eroded decisiveness in public administration? The political use of law and legal knowledge amid democratic backsliding in Poland

    Sonia Horonziak, Marcin Kaim•Policy Studies•2025

  • Family convergence in a polarised environment

    Open Access•Félix Krawatzek, Hakob Matevosyan•European Politics and Society•2026

  • Democratic Resilience in the Twenty-First Century

    Open Access•Aurel Croissant, Lars Pelke et al.•Political Studies•2025

  • Affective polarization and democratic erosion

    Open Access•Loreto Cox, Pedro Cubillos et al.•Political Science Research and…•2025

  • Democratic Backsliding and Endogenous Polarization

    Open Access•Elizabeth Frantz, Andrea Kendall-Taylor et al.•Political Behavior•2025

  • Partisan sorting, affective polarization, and democratic backsliding

    Hyun Su Kim, Hyeok Yong Kwon•Democratization•2025

  • Thinking democracy in a digital age

    Open Access•Jennifer Forestal, Susan Bickford et al.•Contemporary Political Theory•2025

  • Why masses support democratic backsliding

    Open Access•Noam Gidron, Yotam Margalit et al.•American Journal of Political…•2025

  • Beyond Observational Relationships

    Open Access•Noam Gidron, James Adams et al.•British Journal of Political…•2025

  • Christian nationalism and support for leaders violating democratic norms during national emergencies

    Open Access•L Perry, Joshua B Grubbs•Politics and Religion•2024

  • A New Measure of Affective Polarization

    Open Access•Nuno Campos, Celso Federico•American Political Science Review•2025

  • Polyarchy

    Robert Alan Dahl•Polyarchy•1973

  • American Affective Polarization in Comparative Perspective

    Open Access•Noam Gidron, James Adams et al.•American Affective Polarization…•2020

  • Why Washington Won't Work

    Marc J Hetherington, Thomas J Rudolph et al.•Why Washington Won't Work•2015

  • Polarization

    Nolan Mccarty•Polarization•2019

  • The Partisan Sort

    Matthew Levendusky•Partisan Sort•2009

  • In Defense of Negativity

    John Gray Geer•In Defense of Negativity•2006

  • Uncivil Agreement

    L Mason•Uncivil agreement•2018

  • Ethnic antagonism erodes Republicans’ commitment to democracy

    Open Access•Larry M Bartels•Proceedings of the National…•2020

  • Measuring Group Differences in High‐Dimensional Choices

    Matthew Gentzkow, Jesse M Shapiro et al.•Econometrica•2019

  • Politicians polarize and experts depolarize public support for Covid-19 management policies across countries

    Open Access•Alexandra Flores, Jennifer C Cole et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2022

  • Polarization in the contemporary political and media landscape

    Open Access•Anne Wilson, Anne E Wilson et al.•Current Opinion in Behavioral…•2020

  • Correcting inaccurate metaperceptions reduces Americans’ support for partisan violence

    Open Access•Joseph S Mernyk, Sophia L Pink et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2022

  • Greater Internet use is not associated with faster growth in political polarization among US demographic groups

    Open Access•Levi Boxell, Matthew Gentzkow et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2017

  • The promise and pitfalls of cross-partisan conversations for reducing affective polarization

    Open Access•Erik Santoro, David E Broockman•Science Advances•2022

  • Exaggerated meta-perceptions predict intergroup hostility between American political partisans

    Open Access•Samantha L Moore-Berg, Lee-Or Ankori-Karlinsky et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2020

  • Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook

    Open Access•Eytan Bakshy, Messing et al.•Science•2015

  • Status threat, not economic hardship, explains the 2016 presidential vote

    Open Access•Diana C Mutz•Proceedings of the National…•2018

  • Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization

    Open Access•Christopher A Bail, Chris Bail et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2018

  • A Theory of System Justification

    Open Access•John T Jost•Theory of System Justification•2020

  • Red Media, Blue Media

    Open Access•Sharad Iyengar, Kyu S Hahn•Journal of Communication•2009

  • Radical American Partisanship

    Nathan P Kalmoe, L Mason•Radical American Partisanship•2022

  • The Welfare Effects of Social Media

    Hunt Allcott, Luca Braghieri et al.•American Economic Review•2020

  • Social Media, News Consumption, and Polarization

    Roee Levy, Ro’ee Levy•American Economic Review•2021

  • Post-Racial or Most-Racial

    M Tesler•Post-Racial or Most-Racial?•2015

  • Dynamic Partisanship

    Ken Kollman, John Edgar Jackson•Dynamic Partisanship•2020

  • Coping with the Covid‐19 pandemic through institutional trust

    Open Access•Michele Roccato, Pasquale Colloca et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2021

  • Four Threats

    Open Access•Nolan Mccarty•Political Science Quarterly•2021

  • The Ideological Foundations of Affective Polarization in the U.S. Electorate

    Open Access•Steven W Webster, Alan I Abramowitz•American Politics Research•2017

  • The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. elections in the 21st century

    Open Access•Alan I Abramowitz, Steven Webster et al.•Electoral Studies•2015

  • Polarization, Demographic Change, and White Flight from the Democratic Party

    Joshua N Zingher•The Journal of Politics•2018

  • The Parties in Our Heads

    Douglas J Ahler, Gaurav Sood•The Journal of Politics•2018

  • Evidence of the Long-Term Persistence of Adults' Political Predispositions

    David O Sears, Carolyn L Funk•The Journal of Politics•1999

  • (Mis)estimating Affective Polarization

    James N Druckman, Samara Klar et al.•The Journal of Politics•2022

  • The Home as a Political Fortress

    Sharad Iyengar, Shanto Iyengar et al.•The Journal of Politics•2018

  • Political Homophily in Social Relationships

    Gregory A Huber, N Malhotra•The Journal of Politics•2017

  • The Limits of Partisan Prejudice

    Yphtach Lelkes, Sean J Westwood et al.•The Journal of Politics•2017

  • A Cross-Cutting Calm

    L Mason•Public Opinion Quarterly•2016

  • Mass Polarization

    Yphtach Lelkes•Public Opinion Quarterly•2016

  • How Affective Polarization Undermines Support for Democratic Norms

    Open Access•Jon Kingzette, James N Druckman et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2021

  • Affective Polarization or Partisan Disdain

    Open Access•Samara Klar, Yanna Krupnikov et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2018

  • The Effects of Polarized Evaluations on Political Participation

    Open Access•Chloe Ahn, Diana C Mutz•Public Opinion Quarterly•2023

  • Are there Still Limits on Partisan Prejudice

    Open Access•Sean J Westwood, Sean Westwood et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2019

  • Authoritarianism and Affective Polarization

    Matthew D Luttig•Public Opinion Quarterly•2017

  • What Do We Measure When We Measure Affective Polarization

    Open Access•James N Druckman, Matthew S Levendusky et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2019

  • How to study democratic backsliding

    Open Access•James N Druckman•Political Psychology•2024

  • The Strengthening of Partisan Affect

    Open Access•Sharad Iyengar, Shanto Iyengar et al.•Political Psychology•2018

  • Political Consequences of Partisan Prejudice

    Open Access•Richard M Shafranek•Political Psychology•2020

  • Partisan Media Exposure and Attitudes Toward the Opposition

    Matthew Levendusky•Political Communication•2013

  • Partisanship as a Social Identity

    Open Access•Emily A West, Sharad Iyengar et al.•Political Behavior•2022

  • The Inseparability of Race and Partisanship in the United States

    Open Access•Sean Westwood, Erik Peterson•Political Behavior•2022

  • Partisan Stability During Turbulent Times

    Open Access•Donald P Green, Paul Platzman•Political Behavior•2024

  • Effect of Media Environment Diversity and Advertising Tone on Information Search, Selective Exposure, and Affective Polarization

    Open Access•Richard R Lau, David J Andersen et al.•Political Behavior•2017

  • Affective Polarization and Misinformation Belief

    Open Access•Libby Jenke•Political Behavior•2024

  • Beyond the Running Tally

    Open Access•Larry M Bartels•Political Behavior•2002

  • Affective Polarization

    Open Access•Joseph Phillips•Political Behavior•2022

  • Pigeonholing Partisans

    Open Access•Jacob E Rothschild, Adam J Howat et al.•Political Behavior•2019

  • How Ideology Fuels Affective Polarization

    Open Access•Jon C Rogowski, Joseph L Sutherland•Political Behavior•2016

  • Partisan Dehumanization in American Politics

    Open Access•Erin C Cassese•Political Behavior•2021

  • How stable is party identification

    Open Access•Donald P Green, Bradley Palmquist•Political Behavior•1994

  • Party Animals? Extreme Partisan Polarization and Dehumanization

    Open Access•James L Martherus, James Martherus et al.•Political Behavior•2021

  • The Dating Preferences of Liberals and Conservatives

    Open Access•Casey A Klofstad, Casey Klofstad et al.•Political Behavior•2013

  • Social Trust in Polarized Times

    Open Access•Amber Hye-Yon Lee•Political Behavior•2022

  • The Effects of Measurement Error on Two-Stage, Least-Squares Estimates

    Open Access•Donald P Green•Political Analysis•1990

  • Searching for Bright Lines in the Trump Presidency

    Open Access•John Michael Carey, Gretchen Helmke et al.•Perspectives on Politics•2019

  • The Realignment of Political Tolerance in the United States

    Open Access•Dennis Chong, Jack Citrin et al.•Perspectives on Politics•2024

  • Macropartisanship Revisited

    Open Access•Donald P Green, Brian T Hamel et al.•Perspectives on Politics•2024

  • Is the American Public Really Turning Away from Democracy? Backsliding and the Conceptual Challenges of Understanding Public Attitudes

    Open Access•Amel Ahmed•Perspectives on Politics•2023

  • On Democratic Backsliding

    Open Access•Nancy Bermeo•Journal of democracy•2016

  • The partisan nature of support for democratic backsliding

    Open Access•Elisabeth Gidengil, Dietlind Stolle et al.•European Journal of Political…•2022

  • The tie that divides

    Open Access•Sean J Westwood, Sean Westwood et al.•European Journal of Political…•2018

  • Towards a unified approach to research on democratic backsliding

    Haemin Jee, Hans Lueders et al.•Democratization•2022

  • The relationship between affective polarization and democratic backsliding

    Yunus Emre Orhan•Democratization•2022

  • Of Time and Partisan Stability

    Open Access•Philip E Converse•Comparative Political Studies•1969

  • The Stability of Party Identification in Western Democracies

    Open Access•Eric Schickler, Donald P Green•Comparative Political Studies•1997

  • Unwelcome Change

    David Waldner, Ellen Lust•Annual Review of Political Science•2018

  • Does Affective Polarization Undermine Democratic Norms or Accountability? Maybe Not

    Open Access•David E Broockman, Joshua L Kalla et al.•American Journal of Political…•2023

  • Fear and Loathing across Party Lines

    Open Access•Sharad Iyengar, Shanto Iyengar et al.•American Journal of Political…•2015

  • Reference Points and Democratic Backsliding

    Open Access•Edoardo Grillo, Carlo Prato•American Journal of Political…•2023

  • Ideology, Not Affect

    Open Access•Mia Costa•American Journal of Political…•2021

  • American Politics in Two Dimensions

    Open Access•Joseph E Uscinski, A M Enders et al.•American Journal of Political…•2021

  • The Economic Consequences of Partisanship in a Polarized Era

    Open Access•Christopher Mcconnell, Yotam Margalit et al.•American Journal of Political…•2018

  • Rational Learning and Partisan Attitudes

    Alan S Gerber, Alan Gerber et al.•American Journal of Political…•1998

  • The Policy Basis of Measured Partisan Animosity in the United States

    Open Access•Lilla V Orr, Gregory A Huber•American Journal of Political…•2020

  • The Nature of Affective Polarization

    Open Access•Nicholas C Dias, Nicholas Dias et al.•American Journal of Political…•2022

  • Partisan Gaps in Political Information and Information‐Seeking Behavior

    Open Access•Erik Peterson, Sharad Iyengar et al.•American Journal of Political…•2021

  • Polarization and the Decline of the American Floating Voter

    Open Access•Corwin D Smidt•American Journal of Political…•2017

  • Does Choice Bring Loyalty? Electoral Participation and the Development of Party Identification

    Open Access•Elias Dinas•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • Democracy by Deterrence

    Open Access•Gretchen Helmke, Mary Kroeger et al.•American Journal of Political…•2022

  • The Hostile Audience

    Open Access•Yphtach Lelkes, Gaurav Sood et al.•American Journal of Political…•2017

  • Political Competition, Partisanship and Interpersonal Trust in Electoral Democracies

    Open Access•Ryan E Carlin, Gregory J Love•British Journal of Political…•2018

  • Political isolation in America

    Open Access•Byungkyu Lee, P Bearman•Network Science•2020

  • Sex, Politics, and Public Opinion

    Open Access•Arthur H Miller•PS Political Science & Politics•1999

  • Madison's Constitution Under Stress

    Open Access•Paul Pierson, Eric Schickler•Annual Review of Political Science•2019

  • The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States

    Sharad Iyengar, Yphtach Lelkes et al.•Annual Review of Political Science•2018

  • Politics across Generations

    M Kent Jenning, M Kent Jennings et al.•The Journal of Politics•2009

  • Political Polarization in the American Public

    Morris P Fiorina, Samuel J Abram et al.•Annual Review of Political Science•2008

  • Affect, Not Ideology

    Sharad Iyengar, Shanto Iyengar et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2012

  • Affective polarization in multiparty systems

    Open Access•Markus Wagner•Electoral Studies•2021

  • The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of the Law

    Open Access•Barry R Weingast•American Political Science Review•1997

  • The general fault in our fault lines

    Open Access•Kai Ruggeri, Bojana Većkalov et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2021

Unique citing works24
Citations per year12
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 23

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae