Do fans care about controversial sport sponsorships? The sport sponsorship moral appropriateness decision-making process unravelled
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24230367 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Katho Jacobs (0009-0004-2574-6594, Ghent University), Steffi De Jans (0000-0002-2733-353X, Ghent University), Tom Evens (0000-0002-7274-7432, Ghent University), Bram Constandt (0000-0002-5630-0745, Ghent University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | 1-18 |
| Publication date | 2026-10-04 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Culture Sport Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1461-0981 • E-ISSN: 1743-0445 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/17430437.2026.2732140 |
| OpenAlex | W7219795583 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 69 |
The sport sponsorship landscape includes companies promoting controversial products, such as gambling, alcohol, fast food, and soft drinks. Despite widespread concerns, limited research has examined how sport fans morally evaluate controversial sponsors in sport. This study aimed to unravel the cognitive processes fans engage in when evaluating sponsorship’s appropriateness. Using 30 in-depth interviews and a q-methodology-based sorting task, participants ranked 29 sponsors from least appropriate to most appropriate. Findings reveal that commercial gambling is perceived as the least appropriate, while sport brands are viewed as the most appropriate sponsors for sport. Fans might experience a psychological discomfort when confronted with a controversial sponsor in sport and employ moral reasoning strategies to reconcile these tensions. The moral appropriateness decision-making process explains why fans perceive a controversial sport sponsor as (in)appropriate. This study not only contributes to sport management theory but also helps sport organizations forecast fans’ moral perceptions of sport sponsorships.
consumer attitudes · Decision-making · fans · sports sponsorship · Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification · Physical Education and Sports Studies · Sports, Gender, and Society
Ethical Decision-Making Theory
How (and where) does moral judgment work?
The New Synthesis in Moral Psychology
Are gambling company sports sponsorships a losing game? Investigating consumer responses on gambling, brand and team outcomes
Sponsored
A Continuum of Impression Formation, from Category-Based to Individuating Processes
The impact of unhealthy food sponsorship vs. pro-health sponsorship models on young adults’ food preferences
Dealing with great challenges via rigorous and relevant empirical sport management research
The Health Halo Trend in UK Television Food Advertising Viewed by Children
Choice, Motives, and Mixed Messages
Children’s implicit recall of junk food, alcohol and gambling sponsorship in Australian sport
Gambling, fast food and alcohol sponsorship in elite sport – perspectives from Australian sporting fans
Exploring the relationship between Big Food corporations and professional sports clubs
Responsible Leadership in Sport
Probing in qualitative research interviews
Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency
Ethical Blindness
On dual processing and heuristic approaches to moral cognition
Q Methodology and Qualitative Research
The Persuasion Knowledge Model
| Highly cited | No |
|---|