Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Geography of Racially Polarized Voting

Calibrating Surveys at the District Level

Bibliographic Data

ID3249703
AuthorsShiro Kuriwaki (0000-0002-5687-2647, Yale University, corresponding author), Stephen Ansolabehere (0000-0001-5240-9084, Harvard University Press, corresponding author), Angelo Dagonel (Harvard University Press, corresponding author), Soichiro Yamauchi (0000-0003-0554-2717, Film Independent, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume118
Issue2
Pages922-939
Publication date2024-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Political Science Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-0554 • E-ISSN: 1537-5943
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0003055423000436
OpenAlexW4382280080
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited58

Debates over racial voting, and over policies to combat vote dilution, turn on the extent to which groups' voting preferences differ and vary across geography. We present the first study of racial voting patterns in every congressional district (CD) in the United States. Using large-sample surveys combined with aggregate demographic and election data, we find that national-level differences across racial groups explain 60% of the variation in district-level voting patterns, whereas geography explains 30%. Black voters consistently choose Democratic candidates across districts, whereas Hispanic and white voters' preferences vary considerably across geography. Districts with the highest racial polarization are concentrated in the parts of the South and Midwest. Importantly, multiracial coalitions have become the norm: in most CDs, the winning majority requires support from non-white voters. In arriving at these conclusions, we make methodological innovations that improve the precision and accuracy when modeling sparse survey data

Democracy · Demographic economics · Economics · Geography · Norm (philosophy · Polarization (electrochemistry · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Statistics · Survey data collection · Voting · Demography · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Mathematics · Migration, Refugees, and Integration · Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies

  • After Alexander

    Open Access•Jordan Ragusa, Claire B Wofford•Election Law Journal: Rules,…•2026

  • Race, Responsiveness, and Representation in U.S. Lawmaking

    Open Access•G Agustin Markarian, Jacob S Hacker et al.•American Political Science Review•2025

  • Improving Small-Area Estimates of Public Opinion by Calibrating to Known Population Quantities

    Open Access•William Marble, Joshua D Clinton•Political Analysis•2024

  • Making online polls more accurate

    Open Access•Alberto Arletti, Maria Letizia Tanturri et al.•Frontiers in Political Science•2025

  • Dilutive Drift

    Open Access•Ursula Hackett•Perspectives on Politics•2026

  • Rural–urban divide in support for renewable energy policy

    Inhwan Ko, Nicolas Wittstock et al.•Environmental Politics•2025

  • Crossover Voting Rates in Partisan and Nonpartisan Elections

    Open Access•Conor M Dowling, Catherine Dowling et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2025

  • Rural residency, rural resentment, and attitudes toward public land management in the United States

    B Kal Munis, Zoe Nemerever•Environmental Politics•2025

  • Place-Based Partisanship

    Stephanie Ternullo•American Journal of Sociology•2024

  • The shaping of Southern politics

    J Morgan Kousser•The shaping of Southern politics•1974

  • Southern politics in State and Nation

    V O Key•Southern politics in State and…•1949

  • The Space between Us

    Open Access•Ryan D Enos•The space between us•2017

  • The Increasingly United States

    D J Hopkins•Increasingly United States•2018

  • Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models

    Open Access•Andrew Gelman, Jennifer Hill•Data Analysis Using Regression…•2006

  • Red State, Blue State, Rich State, Poor State

    Andrew Gelman•Red State, Blue State, Rich…•2009

  • Behind the Mule

    Open Access•Matt Dawson, Michael C Dawson•Behind the Mule•1995

  • BRMS

    Open Access•Paul-Christian Bürkner•Journal of Statistical Software•2017

  • Why Did the Democrats Lose the South? Bringing New Data to an Old Debate

    Ilyana Kuziemko, Ebonya Washington•American Economic Review•2018

  • Steadfast Democrats

    Open Access•Ismail K White, Chryl N Laird•Steadfast Democrats - How Social…•2020

  • Quiet Revolution in the South

    James E Alt, Michael B Binford et al.•Quiet Revolution in the South•1994

  • The Politics of Resentment

    Katherine J Cramer•Politics of Resentment•2015

  • Understanding the Asian American Vote in the 2016 Election

    Open Access•Natalie Masuoka, Hahrie Han et al.•The Journal of Race Ethnicity and…•2018

  • The Collaborative Multiracial Post-Election Survey (Cmps)

    Open Access•Lorrie Frasure-Yokley, Janelle Wong et al.•PS Political Science & Politics•2019

  • Iff the Assumption Fits

    Open Access•Wendy K Tam Cho•Political Analysis•1998

  • A Tale of “Two Souths”

    Open Access•Seth C Mckee, Melanie J Springer•Social Science Quarterly•2015

  • Why Cities Lose

    Open Access•Jamie Monogan•Political Science Quarterly•2020

  • Best practices in collecting online data with Asian, Black, Latino, and White respondents

    Matt A Barreto, Lorrie Frasure-Yokley et al.•Politics Groups and Identities•2018

  • Deep roots

    Avidit Acharya•Deep Roots•2018

  • How Should We Measure District-Level Public Opinion on Individual Issues

    Carole Warshaw, Christopher Warshaw et al.•The Journal of Politics•2012

  • The Foundations of Latino Voter Partisanship

    R Michael Alvarez, Lisa Garcia Bedolla•The Journal of Politics•2003

  • Obstacles to Estimating Voter ID Laws’ Effect on Turnout

    Justin Grimmer, E Hersh et al.•The Journal of Politics•2018

  • Polarizing the Electoral Connection

    Jonathan P Kastellec, Jeffrey R Lax et al.•The Journal of Politics•2015

  • It’s Nothing Personal

    Gary C Jacobson•The Journal of Politics•2015

  • The Curious Case of Black “Conservatives

    Open Access•Hakeem Jefferson•Public Opinion Quarterly•2024

  • Obama and the White Vote

    Open Access•Todd Donovan•Political Research Quarterly•2010

  • A New Measure of Group Influence in Presidential Elections

    Open Access•Matt A Barreto, L Collingwood et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2010

  • Estimating Racially Polarized Voting

    Daron R Shaw•Political Research Quarterly•1997

  • Asians?A monolithic voting bloc

    Open Access•Wendy K Tam•Political Behavior•1995

  • The Urban–Rural Gulf in American Political Behavior

    Open Access•James G Gimpel, Nathan Lovin et al.•Political Behavior•2020

  • Voter Registration Databases and MRP

    Open Access•Yair Ghitza, Andrew Gelman•Political Analysis•2020

  • How Does Multilevel Regression and Poststratification Perform with Conventional National Surveys

    Open Access•Matthew K Buttice, Benjamin Highton•Political Analysis•2013

  • Recalibration of Predicted Probabilities Using the “Logit Shift

    Open Access•Evan T R Rosenman, Cory Mccartan et al.•Political Analysis•2023

  • The Dynamics of Racial Resentment across the 50 US States

    Open Access•Candis Watts Smith, Rebecca J Kreitzer et al.•Perspectives on Politics•2020

  • Extending the Use and Prediction Precision of Subnational Public Opinion Estimation

    Open Access•Lucas Leemann, Fabio Wasserfallen•American Journal of Political…•2017

  • How Should We Estimate Public Opinion in The States

    Open Access•Jeffrey R Lax, Jane H Phillips et al.•American Journal of Political…•2009

  • Deep Interactions with MRP

    Open Access•Yair Ghitza, Andrew Gelman•American Journal of Political…•2013

  • Rural Voters and the Polarization of American Presidential Elections

    Open Access•Seth C Mckee•PS Political Science & Politics•2008

  • Why context should not count

    Open Access•Gary King•Political Geography•1996

  • The perils of cherry picking low frequency events in large sample surveys

    Open Access•Stephen Ansolabehere, Samantha Luk et al.•Electoral Studies•2015

  • Where the Votes Come From

    Open Access•Robert Axelrod•American Political Science Review•1972

  • Political Parties, Public Opinion, and State Policy in the United States

    Open Access•Robert S Erikson, Gerald C Wright et al.•American Political Science Review•1989

  • Bias in Perceptions of Public Opinion among Political Elites

    Open Access•David E Broockman, Christopher Skovron•American Political Science Review•2018

  • The Effect of Black Congressional Representation on Political Participation

    Open Access•Claudine Gay•American Political Science Review•2001

  • Politicized Places

    Open Access•D J Hopkins•American Political Science Review•2010

  • Legislative Staff and Representation in Congress

    Open Access•Alexander Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander Hertel‐fernandez et al.•American Political Science Review•2019

  • A Logical Model for Predicting Minority Representation

    Open Access•Yuki Atsusaka•American Political Science Review•2021

Unique citing works9
Citations per year4,5
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 9

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae