Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Factors Influencing the Acceptance of ChatGPT in High Education

An Integrated Model With PLS-SEM and fsQCA Approach

Bibliographic Data

ID3252504
AuthorsYipeng Zhao (0009-0009-0904-2630, Chengdu University of Technology), Yan Li (0000-0001-6650-7726, Chengdu University of Technology, corresponding author), Yuyao Xiao (Southwestern University of Finance and Economics), Haodong Chang (0000-0003-0639-279X, Chengdu University of Technology), Bo Liu (0000-0002-6536-517X, Chengdu University of Technology)
Year2024
Volume14
Issue4
Publication date2024-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSAGE Open (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2158-2440 • E-ISSN: 2158-2440
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/21582440241289835
OpenAlexW4403518755
LanguageEN
Citations received17
References cited74

The swift incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) into higher education has significantly propelled the digital transformation of education. This advancement is crucial for educators aiming to augment teaching quality through AI technologies, such as ChatGPT. However, the acceptance of ChatGPT among college students remains underexplored. This paper aims to clarify the determinants influencing college students' acceptance of ChatGPT and to facilitate its widespread adoption in higher education. To achieve this, we integrate the Technology Readiness Index (TRI), Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), and Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) to develop a novel research framework. Employing a mixed-method approach that includes PLS-SEM and fsQCA, we analyze data from 298 Chinese college students. Our findings indicate that discomfort and insecurity adversely affect Perceived Ease of Use (PEU) and Perceived Usefulness (PU) in the context of ChatGPT adoption. Additionally, both PEU and PU positively impact attitudes, which, in conjunction with Subjective Norms (SN) and Perceived Behavioral Control (PBC), bolster the intention to accept ChatGPT. Insights from fsQCA reveal that the acceptance of ChatGPT among students is not driven by a singular factor but by an amalgamation of these elements, underscoring the complex nature of technology adoption. The paper concludes with practical recommendations for educators and designers to refine curriculum design and teaching methodologies, boost student engagement and learning efficacy, and promote the broader adoption of educational technology

Business · Human–computer interaction · Knowledge management · Process management · Sociology · Structural equation modeling · Technology Acceptance Model · Usability · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Computer Science · Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society · Psychology · Technology Adoption and User Behaviour

  • Factors influencing the college students’ effectiveness in discipline competitions

    Open Access•Maoyan She, Dengzhou Zeren et al.•BMC Psychology•2026

  • ChatGPT Acceptance and Use in Higher Education

    Open Access•Fan Yang•TechTrends•2026

  • Predicting higher education students' continued intention and self-reported use of generative AI tools in academic work

    Open Access•Lawrence Jinming Du, Zhi Liu et al.•Acta Psychologica•2026

  • Model for assessing the maturity level of digital transformation in higher education institutions

    Open Access•Jessie Bravo-Jaico, Roger Ernesto Alarcón García et al.•Frontiers in Education•2025

  • Sociodemographic predictors and usability perceptions explaining academic use intention of ChatGPT among university students in Ecuador

    Open Access•Edgar Rolando Morales Caluña, Dario Javier Cervantes Diaz et al.•Frontiers in Education•2025

  • Artificial intelligence in higher education

    Open Access•Dong Yu Long, Shuai Wang et al.•Frontiers in Education•2026

  • ChatGPT Acceptance Among Students

    Open Access•László Berényi, Ede Lázár et al.•Education Sciences•2025

  • An Integrated Individual, Social, and Technology Model for the Sustainable Adoption of Generative AI in Blended Learning

    Open Access•W K Will, Will W K Ma•Education Sciences•2026

  • Exploring role of digital literacy and theory of planned behavior in shaping generative AI behavior intentions for educational sustainability

    Muhammad Farrukh Shahzad, Shuo Xu et al.•International Journal of…•2026

  • How teachers’ digital literacy influences the intention to use AI teaching tools

    Open Access•Yun Du•Interactive Learning Environments•2026

  • Understanding AI dependency among pre-service teachers

    Mingyu Su, Tommy Tanu Wijaya et al.•Interactive Learning Environments•2025

  • Understanding the impacts of intelligence and anthropomorphism on user stickiness in AI-driven mobile banking applications

    Jung-Chieh Lee, Lihui Zhang et al.•Information Technology and People•2026

  • A Study on the Factors Influencing the Digital Transformation of German Higher Education Institutions and Their Pathways of Action

    Open Access•Huiping Wu, Yinong Chen•European Journal of Education•2026

  • Acceptance and Engagement in Artificial Intelligence–Supported Reading Among Primary School Learners of English as a Foreign Language

    Open Access•Mi Tang, Kunjie Jia et al.•International Journal of Applied…•2026

  • DeepSeek as an AI-Powered Learning Tool

    Open Access•Liqaa Habeb Al-Obaydi, Marcel Pikhart•SAGE Open•2025

  • Aiming to Enhance Higher Education Practice Through Generative AI Integration

    Open Access•Junbin Wang, Chuanbo Zhang et al.•SAGE Open•2025

  • Accounting knowledge as a compass in ChatGPT adoption among accounting students in higher educational institutions

    Saeed Awadh Bin-Nashwan, Nada Alyafai et al.•Journal of Information…•2026

  • A First Course in Factor Analysis

    Andrew L Comrey, Howard B Lee•First Course in Factor Analysis•2013

  • Inexperience and experience with online stores

    Open Access•David Gefen, Elena Karahanna et al.•IEEE Transactions on Engineering…•2003

  • User acceptance of YouTube for procedural learning

    Open Access•Doo Young Lee, Mark R Lehto•Computers & Education•2013

  • Understanding the Influence of Perceived Usability and Technology Self-Efficacy on Teachers’ Technology Acceptance

    Heather Holden, Heather K Holden et al.•Journal of Research on Technology…•2011

  • Merging the norm activation model and the theory of planned behavior in the context of drone food delivery services

    Open Access•Jinkyung Jenny Kim, Jinsoo Hwang•Journal of Hospitality and…•2020

  • The Legacy of the Technology Acceptance Model and a Proposal for a Paradigm Shift.

    Richard P Bagozzi, Richard Bagozzi•Journal of the Association for…•2007

  • Personal Computing

    Ronald L Thompson, Christopher A Higgins et al.•MIS Quarterly•1991

  • Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies

    Open Access•Ronnie Cheung, Doug Vogel•Computers & Education•2013

  • Explaining and predicting users’ continuance intention toward e-learning

    Open Access•Ming-Chi Lee•Computers & Education•2010

  • Effects of higher education institutes’ artificial intelligence capability on students' self-efficacy, creativity and learning performance

    Open Access•Shaofeng Wang, Zhuo Sun et al.•Education and Information…•2023

  • Enticing online consumers

    Open Access•Leida Chen, Lei-da Chen et al.•Information & Management•2002

  • Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model

    Open Access•Paul Legris, John Ingham et al.•Information & Management•2003

  • Examining the Technology Acceptance Model Using Physician Acceptance of Telemedicine Technology

    Paul Jen‐Hwa Hu, Patrick Y K Chau et al.•Journal of Management Information…•1999

  • Gamified learning in higher education

    Open Access•Sujit Subhash, Elizabeth A Cudney•Computers in Human Behavior•2018

  • A concept map-embedded educational computer game for improving students' learning performance in natural science courses

    Gwo-Jen Hwang, Li-Hsueh Yang et al.•Computers & Education•2013

  • Understanding the Blockchain technology adoption in supply chains-Indian context

    Sachin S Kamble, Sachin Kamble et al.•International Journal of…•2019

  • Adoption of artificial intelligence in higher education

    Open Access•Sheshadri Chatterjee, Kalyan Kumar Bhattacharjee•Education and Information…•2020

  • ChatGPT

    Open Access•Eva A M van Dis, Johan Bollen et al.•Nature•2023

  • Research Design and Methods

    Open Access•Samar Rahi•International Journal of…•2017

  • Determinants of Intention to Use ChatGPT for Educational Purposes

    Behzad Foroughi, Madugoda Gunaratnege Senali et al.•International Journal of…•2024

  • From Intentions to Actions

    Icek Ajzen•Action Control•1985

  • The theory of planned behavior

    Open Access•Icek Ajzen•Organizational Behavior and Human…•1991

  • Common method biases in behavioral research

    Philip M Podsakoff, Scott B Mackenzie et al.•Journal of Applied Psychology•2003

  • A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling

    Open Access•Jörg Henseler, Christian M Ringle et al.•Journal of the Academy of…•2015

  • When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM

    Open Access•Joseph F Hair, Jeffrey J Risher et al.•European Business Review•2019

  • A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs

    Open Access•Gilbert A Churchill•Journal of Marketing Research•1979

  • Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)

    Open Access•Joe F Hair Jr, Joe F Hair et al.•European Business Review•2014

  • Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions

    Open Access•Vivek Venkatesh, Viswanath Venkatesh et al.•Decision Sciences•2008

  • Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology

    Fred D Davis•MIS Quarterly•1989

  • The ‘smart’ classroom

    Michael Kwet, Paul Prinsloo•Teaching in Higher Education•2020

  • Investigating the Acceptance of Mobile Library Applications with an Extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)

    Open Access•Hamaad Rafique, Alaa Omran Almagrabi et al.•Computers & Education•2020

  • CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting

    Open Access•Ganesh Dash, Justin Paul•Technological Forecasting and…•2021

  • Effectiveness of immersive virtual reality using head‐mounted displays on learning performance

    Open Access•Bian Wu, Xiaoxue Yu et al.•British Journal of Educational…•2020

  • Studying configurations with qualitative comparative analysis

    Open Access•Thomas Greckhamer, Santi Furnari et al.•Strategic Organization•2018

  • Configurational Comparative Methods

    Benoît Rihoux, C C Ragin et al.•Comparative methods•2009

  • Students’ satisfaction and continued intention toward e-learning

    Open Access•Mona Rajeh, Fahad H Abduljabbar et al.•Medical Education Online•2021

  • Beyond Baron and Kenny

    Andrew F Hayes•Communication Monographs•2009

  • Shopping behaviors of individual tourists from the Chinese Mainland to Hong Kong

    Open Access•Tsan-Ming Choi, Tsan‐Ming Choi et al.•Tourism Management•2008

  • Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior

    R J Hill, Martin Fishbein et al.•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1977

  • Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling

    Open Access•Nassim Tabri, Craig M Elliott•Canadian Graduate Journal of…•2012

Unique citing works17
Citations per year17
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 17

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae