Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

An empirical investigation of ethnic-cultural procedural fairness effects and their boundary conditions among three societal groups in South Africa

Bibliographic Data

ID3609060
AuthorsKim Dierckx (0000-0001-6589-9393, Ghent University, corresponding author), Ian Rothmann (North-West University), Hermann Swart (0000-0002-9560-3941, Stellenbosch University), Marieta Du Plessis (0000-0002-3865-6959, University of the Western Cape), Barbara Valcke (0000-0001-6353-8308, Ghent University), Stef Esterhuizen, Stef Esterhulzen (0000-0002-5321-9570, North-West University), Magda Kloppers (0000-0003-2435-0809, North-West University), Estelle Mynhardt (North-West University), Sbonelo Gift Ndlovu, Eva Kefilwe Sekwena (North-West University), Alain Van Hiel (0000-0003-2286-737X, Ghent University)
Year2025
Volume51
Issue13
Pages3520-3545
Publication date2025-08-09
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueNew Community (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0047-9586 • E-ISSN: 1469-9451
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/1369183x.2024.2402066
OpenAlexW4402602455
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited40

Ethnic-cultural procedural fairness refers to the perception that societal actors use fair and unbiased procedures to make decisions vis-à-vis one’s ethnic-cultural group. Prior research using ethnic-cultural minority samples has convincingly shown that such perceptions are associated with a range of desirable outcomes. Yet, this body of evidence has so far limited its scope to European and North American samples. Moreover, more research is needed on the underlying psychological processes. Therefore, the central aim of the present study was to investigate ethnic-cultural procedural fairness effects among three societal groups in South Africa. In Study 1 (N = 326 black South Africans), we observed relationships between ethnic-cultural fairness perceptions and positive institutional and intergroup attitudes. Institutional and social trust respectively mediated these associations. Study 2 (N = 747) replicated these findings among white (n = 595), but not among coloured South Africans (n = 152). Notably, across both studies, we also obtained evidence for moderation. That is, procedural fairness effects on institutional attitudes were significantly smaller among socioeconomically burdened black participants, and procedural fairness effects on intergroup attitudes were fully curbed among white participants who reported high levels of perceived group discrimination. Taken together, our results call for enhanced attention to procedural fairness obstacles outside of typical WEIRD settings

Demographic economics · Economics · Empirical research · Ethnic group · Political science · Socioeconomics · Sociology · Statistics · Anthropology · Discrimination and Equality Law · Mathematics · Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research · Psychology · Religious Freedom and Discrimination · Social Psychology

  • Shades of fairness

    Ceren Su Abacioglu•Journal of Criminological…•2026

  • World Social Science Report, 2016. Challenging Inequalities

    UNESCO UNESCO, International Social Science Council•World Social Science Report 2016…•2016

  • The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice

    Open Access•A Lind, E Allan Lind et al.•Social Psychology of Procedural…•1988

  • A Case for Procedural Justice Climate

    Stefanie E Naumann, Nathan J Bennett et al.•Academy of Management Journal•2000

  • Research Notes. Distributive and Procedural Justice as Predictors of Satisfaction With Personal and Organizational Outcomes.

    Dean B Mcfarlin, P D Sweeney et al.•Academy of Management Journal•1992

  • Procedural Justice, Trust, and Institutional Legitimacy

    Michael Hough, Jonathan Jackson et al.•Policing•2010

  • The effects of trust in authority and procedural fairness on cooperation.

    David De Cremer, T R Tyler•Journal of Applied Psychology•2007

  • Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement

    Open Access•Adamantios Diamantopoulos, Marko Sarstedt et al.•Journal of the Academy of…•2012

  • Most people are not Weird

    Open Access•J Henrich, Steven J Heine et al.•Nature•2010

  • Handbook of Organizational Justice

    Jerald Greenberg, Jason A Colquitt•Handbook of Organizational Justice•2013

  • Justice in the Workplace

    Russell Cropanzano•Justice in the Workplace•2012

  • The “ironic” fair process effect

    Open Access•Kim Dierckx, Emanuele Politi et al.•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2020

  • Is There Social Capital in a Social Network Site

    Open Access•Sebastián Valenzuela, Namsu Park et al.•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2009

  • War and Conflict in Africa

    Craig Mark•Australian Journal Of International…•2013

  • Corruption, institutional trust and political engagement in Peru

    Open Access•Celeste Beesley, Darren Hawkins•World Development•2021

  • Patterns of intergroup attitudes in South Africa after 1994

    Open Access•Elirea Bornman•International Journal of…•2011

  • The trickle‐down effect of procedural fairness on perceptions of daily discrimination

    Open Access•Kim Dierckx, Barbara Valcke et al.•European Journal of Social…•2021

  • Perceived discrimination and psychological well-being in the USA and South Africa

    D R Williams, Rahwa Haile et al.•Ethnicity and Health•2012

  • The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research

    Reuben M Baron, D A Kenny•Journal of Personality and Social…•1986

  • What price fairness when security is at stake? Police legitimacy in South Africa

    Open Access•Ben Bradford, Aziz Z Huq et al.•Regulation & Governance•2014

  • Organizing consent

    Open Access•Marcia Grimes•European Journal of Political…•2006

  • Does Truth Lead to Reconciliation? Testing the Causal Assumptions of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Process

    James L Gibson•American Journal of Political…•2004

  • Affective mediators of intergroup contact

    Hermann Swart, Miles Hewstone et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2011

  • Explaining the apartheid city

    Paul Maylam•Journal of Southern African Studies•1995

  • Racial Differences in Physical and Mental Health

    Open Access•David R Williams, Yan Yu et al.•Journal of Health Psychology•1997

  • Perceived discrimination, race and health in South Africa

    Open Access•David R Williams, Hector M González et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2008

  • Do minorities perceive procedural fairness merely in terms of ethnic bias suppression? Evaluation of the concept of fairness in multicultural conflicts

    Kim Dierckx, Alain Van Hiel et al.•New Community•2022

  • Diversity and Out-Group Attitudes in the Netherlands

    Jasper Van Assche, Arne Roets et al.•New Community•2014

  • Societal Actors Shape Collective Identities of Minorities

    Open Access•Barbara Valcke, Alain Van Hiel et al.•Social Justice Research•2020

  • Perceived Corruption and Individuals' Life Satisfaction

    Open Access•Marco Ciziceno, G A Travaglino•Social Indicators Research•2019

  • The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior

    Open Access•Sheldon Alexander, Marian Ruderman et al.•Social Justice Research•1987

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae