Me, myself, and allies
Understanding the external sources of power
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3916546 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David Sobek (0000-0002-8718-760X, Louisiana State University, corresponding author), Joe Clare (0000-0003-2245-9376, Louisiana State University) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 469-478 |
| Publication date | 2013-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Peace Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-3433 • E-ISSN: 1460-3578 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0022343313484047 |
| OpenAlex | W2104101109 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 29 |
As far back as Thucydides, scholars have hypothesized that power affects the onset of conflict. Despite its importance, power remains a difficult concept to measure, and scholars have primarily relied on material measures that quantify the internal resources available to a state. This concentration on internal sources of power, however, excludes an important power resource available to a state: its external relations. It is reasonable to expect that when a state estimates the power of a potential opponent it looks not only at the internal resources but also at the power of states that would likely join the conflict. In this article, we develop a new measure of external power that explicitly accounts for the external sources of state power. Unlike previous studies that aggregate a state's expected alliance contributions, our measure is based on the expected contribution of all states, allies and non-allies alike. We conduct a preliminary test of this new measure on dispute onset, and our results provide support for power preponderance over balance of power theories. External power parity contributes to dispute onset rather than deterrence. In addition, we show that examining the combined, rather than individual, effects of external and internal power produces some intriguing results, suggesting that one state's internal power preponderance can be offset by another state's preponderance of external power. These results altogether suggest that further studies examining the role of external power can produce fruitful results
Computer security · Measure (data warehouse) · Physics · Political science · Power (physics) · State (computer science) · Computer Science · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Political Conflict and Governance · Psychology · Social Psychology · Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
The Diffusion of War
When the Stakes Are High
Inquiry, Logic, and International Politics
Conventional Deterrence
The MID 3 data set, 1993–2001
The Danger of Dreams
Determinants of Third Partiesâ Intervention and Alignment Choices in Ongoing Conflicts, 1946â2001
The MID3 Data Set, 1993—2001
Reconstructing the correlates of war dataset on material capabilities of states, 1816–1985
Eugene
The Danger of Dreams
Theory of international politics
What Makes Deterrence Work? Cases from 1900 to 1980
Contiguity and Military Escalation in Major Power Rivalries, 1816-1980
Choosing Sides
Back to the Future
Dangerous Dyads
Reevaluating Alliance Reliability
Birds of a Feather
Comparing Measures of Political Similarity
Tau-b or Not Tau-b
The Classical Liberals Were Right
Distinguishing Rivals That Go to War from Those That Do Not
Choosing Sides in Wars
Democratic states and commitment in international relations
Why Democracies May Actually Be Less Reliable Allies
Interests, Institutions, and the Reliability of International Commitments
Bipolarity and War
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,2 |
| Citation span | 2016 - 2016 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |