Group influence on individual risk taking
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3935238 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michael A Wallach (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), Nathan Kogan (Educational Testing Service), Daryl J Bem |
| Year | 1962 |
| Volume | 65 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 75-86 |
| Publication date | 1962-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0096-851X |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1037/h0044376 |
| PMID | 14004673 |
| OpenAlex | W1981556635 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 128 |
| References cited | 15 |
Does group interaction lead to greater conservatism or to greater risk taking in decisions than would obtain were the decisions arrived at individtrally--or is there an averaging effect?This question was investigated with a procedure in which the protagonist in each of 12 everyday life situations must choose between two courses o~action, one of which involves considerably more risk than the other but also is much more rewarding if successful.The S must decide on the lowest level of probability for the success of the risky alternative that he would deem sufficient to warrant its choice.A total of 218 liberal arts university students participated in the study.In the experimental condition, the ~s first arrived at individual decisions concerning each of the 12 situations; then, the~r were brought together in discussion groups of six with the request that they reach a group consensus on each decision; and afterward, they were asked to make all their decisions privately once again.Some £s also made private decisions yet another time two to six ,.reeks later.The group members!judgments of one another's relative degrees of influence and of popularity within the group also were obtained.There were 14 all-male and 14 all-female groups.'In the control condition, Sa made their decisions individually each of two times with one week intervening, under instructions the second time that encouraged them to change rather than simply to recall their earlier decisions.It was found that (1) group decisions exhibit greater risk taking than appears in pre-discussion individual decisions; (2) post-discussion private
Group (periodic table) · Clinical Psychology · Educational Environments and Student Outcomes · Participatory Visual Research Methods · Psychology · Social Psychology
The Plaintiff Bias in Mock Civil Jury Decision Making
A nonsexist look at the shift to risk
Group induced shift toward risk
Effect of pretesting on measures of individual risk preferences
The generosity shift
Leader effectiveness and leadership conferral as determinants of helping in a medical emergency
Effects of familiarization and group discussion upon risk taking
Diffusion of responsibility and extreme behavior
Risky aggression in individuals and groups
Social decision schemes under risk
Will an observer advise higher risk taking after hearing a discussion of the decision problem
Cohesiveness and social responsibility as determinants of group risk taking
The group risky-shift effect as a function of emotional bonds, actual consequences, and extent of responsibility
Test of the "risk is a value" hypothesis
Choice shifts in group discussion
Who Makes Foreign Policy Decisions and How
Power in Work Groups
Paradigms, labels, and historical analysis
Risky and cautious decision shifts in small groups
Extremitization of Attitudes
A further demonstration of group polarization
Risk in Decision Making across College Students' Major Fields
The “Risky-Shift” Phenomenon with a Heterogeneous Sample
History of Social Psychology
Influence and Leadership
Dissensions et consensus
Group risk‐taking and group polarization
Effect of Selected Psychological Characteristics Upon Choice-Shift Patterns Found Within Hierarchical Groups of Public Accountants
The effects of discussion on group and individual choices among bets
Risk-Taking Preferences of College Students in Canada and the United States
Dependence of the Risky Shift on Instructions
Can Group-and Issue-Related Factors Predict Choice Shift
Risk as Value
The Effects of Group Size and Discussion Time on the Risky Shift
Betting Behavior in Sexually Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Groups
An Exploratory Analysis of Effect of Sex on Shift in Choices
Enhancement of Dominant Risk Tendencies in Group Discussion
Sex, Instructional Set, and Group Make-up
Categorization of contemporary art collectors in Japan
Group moral discount
Safety in Numbers
Diffusion of Responsibility for Actions With Advice
Pre‐deliberation moderation on choice dilemmas
Explaining choice shift
Testing persuasive argument theory's predictor model
From Individuals to Group Members
Why do Groups Make Riskier Decisions Than Individuals
Companions in Crime
Differential social perception and attribution of intergroup violence
The group polarization phenomenon
Diffusion of responsibility and level of risk taking in groups
Information versus conformity in the effects of group discussion on risk taking
Effects of group and individual conditions on choice behavior
Egocentrism in groups
Group discussion and predicted ethical risk taking
Modification of a judgmental style through group interaction
External validity and the risky shift
Is risk a value
Depolarization of attitudes in groups
Choice shift and group polarization
Attitude polarization
Responsibility attribution in groups and individuals
Cognitive and affective processes influencing risk taking in groups
Group decision making under risk of aversive consequences
A social comparison of abilities interpretation of risk-taking behavior
Liberating effects of group pressure
Cultural values and the risky shift
Risk taking by individuals and groups
Attitude polarization
Group position as a function of member attitudes
Pessimism-optimism and risk taking in individual and group contexts
Weighting Positive Versus Negative
Individual commitment to risky and conservative choices as a determinant of shifts in group decisions 1
Need achievement as a motivational basis for the risky shift
Group risk taking as a function of members' anxiety and defensiveness levels1
Risky shift in a naturalistic setting
Conversational Agent Dynamics with Minority Opinion and Cognitive Conflict in Small‐Group Decision‐Making
The risky shift in policy decision making
Risk‐taking
When plans fail
Lost in translation
Sex differences in group communication
Developing a Pedagogy of Metacognition and Transfer
Maternal employment and adolescent sexual behavior
Influence of leadership processes on group polarization
If we have the will, there will be a way
Two studies on polarization
Risky shifts, cautious shifts, and group polarization
Social categorization and attitude change
Retaliatory aggression in individuals and groups
Effects of Physical Separation of Group Members upon Group Risk-taking
On the Metaphysics of Social Psychology
Another Look at the Conformity Explanation of Group-Induced Shifts in Choice
Social Attitudes and Risk-taking
Effects of Risk and Caution Norms on Group Decision Making
Effects of Norm-oriented Group Discussion on Individual Verbal Risk Taking and Conservatism
An Analysis of Group Decisions Involving Risk ("The Risky Shift")
Effects of Different Leadership Styles on Individual Risk-Taking in Groups
Innovations in Organizations
The die is cast
Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences
The Social Psychology of Groups
Sex differences and judgment processes1
Personal preference and the attribution of influence in small groups1
Effects of Group Membership on Risk-Taking Behavior
Effects of Group Membership on Risk-Taking Behavior
Induction of Forces in Discussion Groups
Frontiers in Group Dynamics
Frontiers in Group Dynamics
Functional Analysis of Sex Roles
Deviation, rejection, and communication
Interpersonal decision making
Influence through social communication
Attribute criteriality and sex-linked conservatism as determinants of psychological similarity
| Unique citing works | 128 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,03 |
| Citation span | 1963 - 2025 (63) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | Yes |
| Citation types | Neutral: 110 |