Media representations of early human development
Protecting, feeding and loving the developing brain
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4592500 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Carla O’connor (0000-0001-8134-075X, University College London), Cliodhna O'Connor, H Joffe (0000-0003-3701-5014, University College London) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 97 |
| Pages | 297-306 |
| Publication date | 2013-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Science & Medicine (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0277-9536 • E-ISSN: 1873-5347 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.09.048 |
| PMID | 23273760 |
| OpenAlex | W1973701875 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 22 |
| References cited | 40 |
The public profile of neurodevelopmental research has expanded in recent years. This paper applies social representations theory to explore how early brain development was represented in the UK print media in the first decade of the 21st century. A thematic analysis was performed on 505 newspaper articles published between 2000 and 2010 that discussed early brain development. Media coverage centred around concern with 'protecting' the prenatal brain (identifying threats to foetal neurodevelopment), 'feeding' the infant brain (indicating the patterns of nutrition that enhance brain development) and 'loving' the young child's brain (elucidating the developmental significance of emotionally nurturing family environments). The media focused almost exclusively on the role of parental action in promoting optimal neurodevelopment, rarely acknowledging wider structural, cultural or political means of supporting child development. The significance of parental care was intensified by deterministic interpretations of critical periods, which implied that inappropriate parental input would produce profound and enduring neurobiological impairments. Neurodevelopmental research was also used to promulgate normative judgements concerning the acceptability of certain gender roles and family contexts. The paper argues that media representations of neurodevelopment stress parental responsibility for shaping a child's future while relegating the contributions of genetic or wider societal factors, and examines the consequences of these representations for society and family life
Brain development · Child development · Developmental psychology · Media studies · Newspaper · Normative · Political science · Politics · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Thematic analysis · Child and Animal Learning Development · Early Childhood Education and Development · Law · Neuroscience · Psychology · Social Representations and Identity
(Low) Expectations, Legitimization, and the Contingent Uses of Scientific Knowledge
Digital Parenting Narratives and Social Work Practice
Neuroscience explanations really do satisfy
How has neuroscience affected lay understandings of personhood? A review of the evidence
Beyond animal testing? Human health, organoids, and the rise of new approach methodologies in UK/US media coverage (2013–2024)
Crianças, seus cérebros… e além
The ‘First Three Years’ Movement and the Infant Brain
Is your brain in danger of overheating?”
Mombrain and Sticky DNA”
Neuro-Enhancement Practices across the Lifecourse
The Effects of Gender Neuroessentialism on Transprejudice
How the Public Engages With Brain Optimization
Between medicalisation and normalisation
No second chances? Early critical periods in human development
Targeting brains, producing responsibilities
Fertile bodies, immature brains
Adopting Neuroscience
Parenting agendas
Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research
The intensification of parenting and generational fracturing of spontaneous physical activity from childhood play in the United Kingdom
Love builds brains
Biologising parenting
Scientific knowledge
The normal chaos of love
Content analysis
The cultural contradictions of motherhood
Picturing Personhood
The DNA Mystique
Seeing is believing
Music and spatial task performance
The Seductive Allure of Neuroscience Explanations
Common sense, science and social representations
Living with risk in the age of ‘intensive motherhood’
Neuroscience, Affect, and the Entrepreneurialization of Motherhood
Sex Differences in Emotionality
Public Perceptions and Mass Media in the Biotechnology Controversy
Brainhood, anthropological figure of modernity
Mothers' experiences with intensive parenting and brain development discourse
Developmental science and the media
Youth Justice And Neuroscience
Constituting neurologic subjects
Rebelling against the brain
Contemporary neuroscience in the media
Invisible Inequality
Mindful Practices
The plastic brain
She's From a `Good Family
Constructing the 'Gay Gene' in the News
Social Status and Newspaper Readership
Are Parents Investing Less in Children? Trends in Mothers' and Fathers' Time with Children
Engineering the Entrepreneurial Infant
| Unique citing works | 22 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,69 |
| Citation span | 2013 - 2026 (14) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 21 |