The Impact of Covid-19 and Homeschooling on Students' Engagement With Physical Activity
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4616023 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Astrid Roe (University of Oslo), Marte Blikstad-Balas, Marte Blikstad‐bala (0000-0002-5029-6837, University of Oslo, corresponding author), Cecilie Pedersen Dalland (0000-0002-4212-2976) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 2 |
| Pages | 589227-589227 |
| Publication date | 2021-01-26 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Sports and Active Living (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2624-9367 • E-ISSN: 2624-9367 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fspor.2020.589227 |
| PMID | 33585811 |
| OpenAlex | W3121592946 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
| References cited | 21 |
The COVID-19 pandemic forced an unprecedented global shutdown that closed schools for months. In many nations, schools were closed to students, and teachers directed educational activities remotely via digital devices or homeschooling resources. This article explores how these months of homeschooling have affected the physical activity of Norwegian students in Grades 1-10. All Norwegian students are supposed to have at least 60 min of physical activity every day in school. We draw on data from two surveys, one with parents (N = 4,624) and the other with teachers (N = 726), to provide an indication of the daily physical activity students engaged in during the period of homeschooling. An important finding from the teacher survey is that the degree to which schools prioritized physical education among the school subjects varied greatly between schools and teachers. Key findings from the parent survey were that reported time spent on physical activity increased with the age of the students, that many parents expressed concerns about increased sedentary behavior, and that the most active students were those who showed the greatest engagement and effort in schoolwork in general. Our findings raise the questions of whether students were given too much responsibility for their own physical activity during this period and whether teachers should provide their students with more digital workout sessions and instructional videos
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Mathematics education · Medical education · Norwegian · Pedagogy · Physical activity · Physical education · Physical therapy · Child Development and Digital Technology · Diverse Education Studies and Reforms · Impact of Technology on Adolescents · Medicine · Psychology
İlkokul Öğrenci̇leri̇’nde Fi̇zi̇ksel Okuryazarliğin Refah Poli̇ti̇kalarina Etki̇si̇
Consequences of Covid-19 Lockdown Restrictions on Children Physical Activity—A Slovenian Study
Culturally Responsive Schooling during Covid-19
A leadership-based framework for improving Saudi Arabian female participation in sports
Anthropometric Parameters, Physical Activity, Physical Fitness, and Executive Functions among Primary School Children
Finnish late adolescents’ physical activity during Covid-19 spring 2020 lockdown
Being a docile body
These unscripted moments
Online physically active academic lessons in Covid-19 times
Development and evaluation of a school-based physical literacy intervention for children in Germany
The Use of Physically Active Academic Lessons During the Transition to Face-to-Face Classes
IBM SPSS Statistics 23 Step by Step
Barriers to the Successful Integration of ICT in Teaching and Learning Environments
Physically active lessons as physical activity and educational interventions
Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for Children and Youth
Physical activity and mental health in children and adolescents
Systematic review of sedentary behaviour and health indicators in school-aged children and youth
Factors that explain the use of ICT in secondary-education classrooms
Changes in Physical Activity, Physical Fitness and Well-Being Following a School-Based Health Promotion Program in a Norwegian Region with a Poor Public Health Profile
Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests
Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis
| Citations per year | 2.2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2025 (5) |
| Highly cited | No |