Community-Based Participatory Research Conceptual Model

Community Partner Consultation and Face Validity

Bibliographic Data

ID4697752
AuthorsLorenda Belone (0000-0003-3123-4881, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA), Julie E Lucero (0000-0003-3874-258X, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA, corresponding author), B Duran (0000-0001-5886-5232, University of Washington), Greg Tafoya (University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA), Elizabeth A Baker (0000-0002-5306-4767, St. Louis University, St Louis, Missouri, USA), Domin Chan (Washington State Department of Health), Charlotte Chang (University of California Berkeley, Oakland, California, USA), Ella Greene-Moton (The Flint Odyssey House, Inc., Flint, Michigan, USA), Ella Greene‐Moton (Odyssey House), Michele A Kelley (University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA), Nina Wallerstein (0000-0002-1969-0799, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA)
Year2016
Volume26
Issue1
Pages117-135
Publication date2016-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueQualitative Health Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1049-7323 • E-ISSN: 1552-7557
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1049732314557084
PMID25361792
OpenAlexW2067636205
LanguageEN
Citations received93
References cited42

A national community-based participatory research (CBPR) team developed a conceptual model of CBPR partnerships to understand the contribution of partnership processes to improved community capacity and health outcomes. With the model primarily developed through academic literature and expert consensus building, we sought community input to assess face validity and acceptability. Our research team conducted semi-structured focus groups with six partnerships nationwide. Participants validated and expanded on existing model constructs and identified new constructs based on "real-world" praxis, resulting in a revised model. Four cross-cutting constructs were identified: trust development, capacity, mutual learning, and power dynamics. By empirically testing the model, we found community face validity and capacity to adapt the model to diverse contexts. We recommend partnerships use and adapt the CBPR model and its constructs, for collective reflection and evaluation, to enhance their partnering practices and achieve their health and research goals

Community-based participatory research · Conceptual framework · Conceptual model · Focus group · General partnership · Knowledge management · Management science · Participatory action research · Political science · Praxis · Sociology · Community Health and Development · Computer Science · Engineering · Health Policy Implementation Science · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Psychology

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access