Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

How important are linguistic factors in word skipping during reading

Bibliographic Data

ID5267270
AuthorsDenis Drieghe (0000-0001-9630-8410, Ghent University Hospital, corresponding author), Timothy Desmet (0000-0001-5607-0997, Ghent University Hospital), Marc Brysbaert (0000-0002-3645-3189, Royal Holloway University of London)
Year2007
Volume98
Issue1
Pages157-171
Publication date2007-02-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBritish Journal of Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-1269 • E-ISSN: 2044-8295
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1348/000712606x111258
PMID17319056
OpenAlexW2126116474
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited42

The probability of skipping a word is influenced by its processing ease. For instance, a word that is predictable from the preceding context is skipped more often than an unpredictable word. A meta-analysis of studies examining this predictability effect reported effect sizes ranging from 0 to 13%, with an average of 8%. One study does not fit within this picture and reported 23% more skipping of Dutch pronouns in sentences in which the pronoun had no disambiguating value (e.g. 'Mary was envious of Helen because she never looked so good') than in sentences where it did have a disambiguating value (e.g. 'Mary was envious of Albert because she never looked so good'). We re-examined this ambiguity in Dutch using a task that more closely resembles normal reading and observed only a 9% difference in skipping of the pronoun, bringing this linguistic effect in line with the other findings

Ambiguity · Cognitive psychology · Context (archaeology) · Linguistics · Pronoun · Reading (process) · Word (group theory) · History · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Psychology · Reading and Literacy Development · Second Language Acquisition and Learning

  • The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture

    Open Access•Keith Rayner•Quarterly Journal of Experimental…•2009

  • Can We ‘Read’ the Eye-Movement Patterns of Readers? Unraveling the Relationship Between Reading Profiles and Processing Strategies

    Open Access•Arnout Koornneef, Iris Mulders•Journal of Psycholinguistic…•2017

  • Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading

    Open Access•Keith Rayner, Susan A Duffy•Memory & Cognition•1986

  • Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading

    Open Access•Susan F Ehrlich, Keith Rayner•Journal of Verbal Learning and…•1981

  • The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading

    Open Access•Erik D Reichle, Keith Rayner et al.•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2003

  • The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading

    Open Access•David A Balota, Alexander Pollatsek et al.•Cognitive Psychology•1985

  • Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading

    Open Access•Albrecht Werner Inhoff, Keith Rayner•Perception & Psychophysics•1986

  • Swift

    Ralf Engbert, Antje Nuthmann et al.•Psychological Review•2005

  • Eye movements in reading and information processing

    Keith Rayner•Psychological Bulletin•1998

  • Eye movements in reading and information processing

    Keith Rayner•Psychological Bulletin•1978

Citations per year0.12
Citation span2009 - 2017 (9)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae