Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Cross-Boundary Subsumption

Toward a Political Economy of Platform Labor

Bibliographic Data

ID6008136
AuthorsHao Qi (0000-0002-5830-1274, Renmin University of China), Zhongjin Li (0000-0002-7748-2453, University of Missouri–Kansas City, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume50
Issue6
Pages702-727
Publication date2024-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueModern China (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0097-7004 • E-ISSN: 1552-6836
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/00977004241256295
OpenAlexW4399274238
LanguageEN
References cited22

The existing body of research on the platform economy provides a variety of interpretations of platform labor. Nevertheless, current studies have either placed exchange rather than production at the core of their interpretations or overlooked the historical continuity of the type of labor to which platform labor belongs. Employing a historical-comparative approach, this article introduces the concept of “cross-boundary subsumption” to illuminate the characteristics of platform labor. Drawing insights from investigations and interviews conducted on ride-hailing platforms in China from 2018 to 2020, this article delves into how cross-boundary subsumption works in reality. The goal is to improve the understanding of platform labor and uncover the limits of the current models of the platform economy

Boundary (topology · Economic system · Economics · Labor relations · Labour economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Digital Economy and Work Transformation · Law · Sharing Economy and Platforms · Taxation and Compliance Studies

  • Contested terrain

    Richard Edwards•Contested terrain•1979

  • The Precariat

    Guy Standing•The Precariat•2011

  • Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets

    Open Access•Jean-Charles Rochet, Jean‐Charles Rochet et al.•Journal of the European Economic…•2003

  • What Do Bosses Do?

    Open Access•Stephen A Marglin•Review of Radical Political…•1974

  • Labor and Monopoly Capital

    Harry Braverman•Monthly Review•1974

  • Beyond algorithmic control

    Angela Ke Li•Information Communication & Society•2022

  • Labour supplies in historical perspective

    Giovanni Arrighi•The Journal of Development Studies•1970

  • Thrown under the bus and outrunning it! The logic of Didi and taxi drivers’ labour and activism in the on-demand economy

    Open Access•Jenny Y Chen•New Media & Society•2017

  • Temporal arbitrage, fragmented rush, and opportunistic behaviors

    Open Access•Jenny Y Chen, Ping Sun•New Media & Society•2020

  • Beyond Precarity

    Open Access•Angela Ke Li•New Media & Society•2022

  • Big Tech

    Open Access•K Birch, D T Cochrane et al.•Science as Culture•2021

  • The Internet of Landlords

    Open Access•Jathan Sadowski•Antipode•2020

  • Giovanni Arrighi in Beijing

    Open Access•Hao Qi, Zhongjin Li•Science & Society•2019

  • Marx's Theory of Working-Class Precariousness

    R Jamil Jonna, John Bellamy Foster•Monthly Review•2016

  • The resurgence of gig work

    Open Access•Jim Stanford•The Economic and Labour Relations…•2017

  • Precarious Work and the Challenge for Asia

    Open Access•A L Kalleberg, Kevin Hewison•American Behavioral Scientist•2013

  • Can Capitalist Farms Defeat Family Farms? The Dynamics of Capitalist Accumulation in Shrimp Aquaculture inSouthChina

    Open Access•Yu Huang•Journal of Agrarian Change•2015

  • Agrarian Change and Labour Supply in Turkey, 1950-1980

    Open Access•Burak Gürel•Journal of Agrarian Change•2011

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae