Choosing strategies that work from the start
A mixed methods study to understand effective development of community–academic partnerships
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6134169 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Emily D Gomez (Health Services Research & Development), Emily Gomez (Department of Psychology, Child and Adolescent Services Research Center, San Diego, USA), Amy Drahota (0000-0003-1169-3546, Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA; Child and Adolescent Services Research Center, San Diego, USA, corresponding author), Aubyn C Stahmer (0000-0002-1596-9848, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, UC Davis MIND Institute, University of California, Sacramento, USA; Child and Adolescent Services Research Center, San Diego, USA) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 277-300 |
| Publication date | 2018-05-19 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Action Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1476-7503 • E-ISSN: 1741-2617 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1476750318775796 |
| PMID | 34539247 |
| OpenAlex | W2803634141 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 40 |
Community–academic partnerships are believed to increase the effectiveness and feasibility of action research. While factors facilitating and hindering community–academic partnerships have been identified, their influence on the collaborative process is unknown, especially during community–academic partnership initiation and development. This explanatory sequential mixed methods study (quantitative→QUALITATIVE) evaluated perspectives of members in an autism community–academic partnership to determine frequently endorsed and influential factors facilitating and hindering the collaborative process during the community–academic partnership’s development. Participants ( n = 11; community stakeholders, implementation scientist, and researchers) endorsed and ranked the importance of factors present in the formation of the community–academic partnership then completed a semi-structured qualitative interview to elaborate on survey responses. Interviews were coded using a coding, comparison, and consensus method and analyzed using the Rapid Assessment Process for frequency and salience of themes across interviews. Integrating mixed methods yielded ranked factors that were perceived to facilitate and hinder the development of the community–academic partnership, and highlighted the relative influence of interpersonal factors on the facilitation of community–academic partnership processes and organizational factors on the hindrance of community–academic partnership processes during development. Some discrepancies emerged between community and academic partners. Results may assist to improve the development of community–academic partnerships, which is becoming increasingly important in healthcare services research, dissemination, and implementation
General partnership · Interpersonal communication · Political science · Public relations · Qualitative property · Qualitative research · Salience (neuroscience · Sociology · Health Policy Implementation Science · Health Sciences Research and Education · Interprofessional Education and Collaboration · Psychology · Social Psychology
Bridging the divide
A Brief Pro-Diversity Social Marketing Intervention Improves Grades and Well-Being of Students From Marginalized Groups
When Higher Education Meets Sustainable Development of Rural Areas
Fostering Community-Academic Partnerships to Promote Employment Opportunities for Refugees with Disabilities
Attempting Randomized Housing First Research in a Community Context
Guest Editor’s Introduction
Centring the Self in Participatory Research
The Ecology of Team Science
Community-Academic Partnerships: A Systematic Review of the State of the Literature and Recommendations for Future Research
Mixed Method Designs in Implementation Research
Promoting Environmental Justice Through Community-Based Participatory Research
A Review of Parent Participation Engagement in Child and Family Mental Health Treatment
Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Results in Health Science Mixed Methods Research Through Joint Displays
A Community Research Partnership to Improve the Diet of African Americans
Methods of Rapid Evaluation, Assessment, and Appraisal
Creating and Sustaining Effective Partnerships to Advance Research on Youth With Serious Emotional and Behavioral Disorders
The research dance
Contradictory Interests, Tangled Power, and Disorganized Organization
Building a Research‐community Collaborative to Improve Community Care for Infants and Toddlers At‐risk for Autism Spectrum Disorders
Collaboration Between Community Advocates and Academic Researchers
Qualitative Data Analysis
Why Action Research
Community-Academic Research on Hard-to-Reach Populations
A Systematic Approach for Using Qualitative Methods in Primary Prevention Research
Using Mixed-Methods Sequential Explanatory Design
| Citations per year | 0.88 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2018 - 2026 (9) |
| Highly cited | No |