A worldwide test of the predictive validity of ideal partner preference matching
Bibliographic Data
10,358) across 43 countries and 22 languages to estimate preference-matching effect sizes. The most rigorous tests revealed significant preference-matching effects in the whole sample and for partnered and single participants separately. The "corrected pattern metric" that collapses across 35 traits revealed a zero-order effect of β = .19 and an effect of β = .11 when included alongside a normative preference-matching metric. Specific traits in the "level metric" (interaction) tests revealed very small (average β = .04) effects. Effect sizes were similar for partnered participants who reported ideals before entering a relationship, and there was no consistent evidence that individual differences moderated any effects. Comparisons between stated and revealed preferences shed light on gender differences and similarities: For attractiveness, men's and (especially) women's stated preferences underestimated revealed preferences (i.e., they thought attractiveness was less important than it actually was). For earning potential, men's stated preferences underestimated-and women's stated preferences overestimated-revealed preferences. Implications for the literature on human mating are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved)
Developmental psychology · Ideal (ethics) · Matching (statistics) · Predictive validity · Preference · Psychometrics · Statistics · Test (biology) · Test validity · Attachment and Relationship Dynamics · Psychology · Social Psychology
Too picky to be picked? Minimum mate standards explain number of years spent single, in uncommitted and committed relationships
Experimental Tests of the Role of Ideal Partner Preferences in Relationships
The evolved psychology of mate preferences
You’re Not Their Type—And That’s Why It Works
From Bias to Brevity
Effects of sexually objectifying gaze on women's self‐sexualization in a mating context
Would you like your partner to share your interests? Vocational ideal-partner standards of singles and couples
Diverse Gender and Sexual Identity in Romantic Partner Selection Experiences
A Credibility Revolution for Relationship Science
Is Family Size Related To Love? Data from 25 Countries
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 10 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |