Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

An Institutional Theory of Divided Government and Party Polarization

Bibliographic Data

ID6230175
AuthorsDaniel Ingberman, Daniel E Ingberman, John Villani
Year1993
Volume37
Issue2
Pages429
Publication date1993-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0092-5853 • E-ISSN: 1540-5907
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2111380
OpenAlexW2326299428
LanguageEN
Citations received56
References cited21

This paper develops a simple model of institutionally driven party competition which may explain the persistence of divided government. In the basic model, two parties that are solely motivated to win elections compete for two offices, the legislature and the executive. Parties offer positions in a single dimension to a single-district sophisticated electorate that understands the institutionally defined relationship between electoral and policy outcomes. When parties are risk-averse, competition for the two offices leads to a prisoner's dilemma: the parties can jointly improve on the one-shot Nash equilibrium in which they adopt convergent positions. Several extensive form election games are shown to allow the parties to solve their prisoner's dilemma in a subgame-perfect Nash equilibrium. In such an equilibrium, parties adopt widely separated positions, and divided government and splitticket voting occur with high probability. Unlike typical voting models, in the basic model there is no tendency for electoral equilibrium to produce the (expected) median voter's ideal policy outcome. These results are robust to a variety of extensions, including significant sincere voting, multiple policy dimensions, and defections by incumbent candidates

Best response · Competition (biology · Dilemma · Divided government · Economics · Epsilon-equilibrium · Game theory · Government (linguistics · Legislature · Microeconomics · Nash equilibrium · Outcome (game theory · Political science · Politics · Prisoner's dilemma · Public economics · Subgame · Subgame perfect equilibrium · Voting · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Fiscal Policies and Political Economy · Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth · Law

  • Primary Election Systems and Representation

    Elisabeth R Gerber, R B Morton•The Journal of Law Economics and…•1998

  • Political Resource Allocation

    John G Matsusaka•The Journal of Law Economics and…•2001

  • Partisan Models and the Search for Party Effects in the US Senate

    Barbara Sinclair•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Interest Group Theory

    Andrew Mcfarland•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • The Party Faithful

    John C Green•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • How Parties Nominate Presidents

    William G Mayer•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • The Comparative Advantage of State Interest Organization Research

    David Lowery, Virginia Gray•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Theories of Parties

    John H Aldrich, Jeffrey D Grynaviski•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • The Road Less Taken

    Daniel M Shea•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Party Coalitions in the US Congress

    D Brady, David W Brady•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Social and Economic Justice Movements and Organizations

    Dara Z Strolovitch, M David Forrest et al.•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Who Sings in the Heavenly Chorus?

    Kay Lehman Schlozman•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Party Nominating Procedures and Recruitment—State and Local Level

    Raymond J La Raja•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Activists, Influence, and Representation in American Elections

    Walter J Stone•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Methodological Issues in the Study of Political Parties

    Hubert Noël, Hans Noel•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Political Parties and Consultants

    David B Magleby•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • State Parties Research

    Gerald C Wright, Gerald Wright•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • The Mobilization and Influence of Business Interests

    Mark Alan Smith•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • What a Difference Twenty-Five Years Makes

    David W Rohde•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Interest Groups and Agendas

    F R Baumgartner•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Interest Groups in American Elections

    Clyde Wilcox, Rentaro Iida•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • The State of Research on Political Parties and Interest Groups

    L Sandy Maisel, Jeffrey M Berry•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • The Evolution of National Party Organizations

    Paul S Herrnson•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Lobbying and Influence

    Beth L Leech•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Urban Interest Groups

    Jeffrey M Berry•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • The Evolution and Alteration of American Party Coalitions

    Mark D Brewer•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • The Pure Partisan Institution

    Byron E Shafer•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Linking Political Parties and Interest Groups

    M T Heaney•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • The President, Party Politics, and Constitutional Development

    Sidney M Milki, Sidney M Milkis et al.•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Winning Isn't Everything

    Ronald B Rapoport•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Methodological Perspectives on Interest Groups

    Scott H Ainsworth, Scott Ainsworth•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • American Political Parties

    Joel H Silbey•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Fiscal Policy, Legislature Size, and Political Parties

    Thomas W Gilligan, John G Matsusaka•National Tax Journal•2001

  • Deviations From Constituent Interests

    Open Access•Thomas W Gilligan, John G Matsusaka•Economic Inquiry•1995

  • The Oxford handbook of American political parties and interest groups

    Michael T Heaney, Louis Sandy Maisel et al.•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Executive veto power and credit claiming

    Open Access•Indridi H Indridason, Indridi Indridason•Public Choice•2011

  • Testing Structural Explanations for U.S. Military Intervention

    Open Access•Afrimadona, Scot Schraufnagel•Open Journal of Political Science•2019

  • Is Neutrality a Feature or a Bug? Delegation, Discretion, and the Democratic Implications of Administrative Law in a Polarized Institutional Environment

    Donald M Gooch, Peyton E Wofford•Administrative Theory & Praxis•2017

  • A note on voting

    Open Access•Paul H Edelman•Mathematical Social Sciences•1997

  • A Spatial Model of U.S. Senate Elections

    Open Access•Jac C Heckelman•Public Choice•2004

  • The Uncovered Set and the Limits of Legislative Action

    Open Access•William T Bianco, Ivan Jeliazkov et al.•Political Analysis•2004

  • Candidate Positioning in U.S. House Elections

    Stephen Ansolabehere, Jane Mcintosh Snyder et al.•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • The Choosers or the Choices? Voter Characteristics and the Structure of Electoral Competition as Explanations for Ticket Splitting

    Douglas D Roscoe•The Journal of Politics•2003

  • Policy Balancing and Preferences for Party Control of Government

    Open Access•Thomas M Carsey, Geoffrey C Layman•Political Research Quarterly•2004

  • A New Kind of Balancing Act

    Open Access•Kyle L Saunders, Alan I Abramowitz et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2005

  • Partisan Ambivalence, Split‐Ticket Voting, and Divided Government

    Open Access•Kenneth Mulligan•Political Psychology•2011

  • Experimenting With the Balancing Hypothesis

    Open Access•John G Geer, Amy Carter et al.•Political Psychology•2004

  • Top-Down Divergence

    Open Access•Kristin Kanthak•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2002

  • Party Balancing and Voting for Congress in the 1996 National Election

    C E Smith, Robert D Brown et al.•American Journal of Political…•1999

  • Vote Choice and the Preference for Divided Government

    Lee Sigelman, Paul J Wahlbeck et al.•American Journal of Political…•1997

  • Who's Responsible for the Economy? The Formation and Consequences of Responsibility Attributions

    Thomas J Rudolph, Thomas Rudolph•American Journal of Political…•2003

  • Racial, Ethnic or Rational Voters? Splitting Tickets in South Africa

    Eric S Mclaughlin•Politikon•2008

  • Adapting Identities

    Open Access•Andre P Audette, Mark Brockway et al.•American Politics Research•2017

  • Coordination, Moderation, and Institutional Balancing in American Presidential and House Elections

    Open Access•Walter R Mebane•American Political Science Review•2000

  • The Electoral Cycle and Institutional Sources of Divided Presidential Government

    Open Access•Matthew Soberg Shugart•American Political Science Review•1995

  • A New Approach to the Study of Ticket Splitting

    Open Access•Barry C Burden, Barry Burden et al.•American Political Science Review•1998

  • Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model

    Ariel Rubinstein•Econometrica•1982

  • Reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games

    Open Access•Reinhard Selten•International Journal of Game…•1975

  • Candidate reputations and the ‘incumbency effect’

    Open Access•M Daniel Bernhardt, Matthias Bernhardt et al.•Journal of Public Economics•1985

  • The Folk Theorem in Repeated Games with Discounting or with Incomplete Information

    Drew Fudenberg, Eric Maskin•Econometrica•1986

  • Elections and Macroeconomic Policy Cycles

    Kenneth Rogoff, Anne Sibert•The Review of Economic Studies•1988

  • Spatial Equilibrium with Entry

    Thomas R Palfrey•The Review of Economic Studies•1984

  • Bureaucrats Versus Voters

    Thomas Romer, Howard Rosenthal et al.•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•1979

  • Divided we govern

    David R Mayhew•Divided we govern•1991

  • An economic theory of democracy

    Anthony Downs•An economic theory of democracy•1985

  • The Theory of Committees and Elections

    Open Access•Duncan Black, Georg Kunze•Theory of Committees and Elections•1986

  • Cooperation and punishment under repeated majority voting

    Open Access•Dennis Epple, Michael H Riordan et al.•Public Choice•1987

  • The pure theory of large two-candidate elections

    Open Access•John O Ledyard•Public Choice•1984

  • The Political Economy of Benefits and Costs

    Barry R Weingast, Kenneth A Shepsle et al.•Journal of Political Economy•1981

  • The Polarization of American Politics

    Keith T Poole, Howard Rosenthal et al.•The Journal of Politics•1984

  • Structure-Induced Equilibria and Perfect-Foresight Expectations

    Arthur T Denzau, Robert J Mackay•American Journal of Political…•1981

  • Robustness of the Multidimensional Voting Model

    Randall L Calvert•American Journal of Political…•1985

  • Presidential Commitment and the Veto

    Daniel E Ingberman, Dennis A Yao•American Journal of Political…•1991

  • A Spatial Model for Legislative Roll Call Analysis

    Keith T Poole, Howard Rosenthal et al.•American Journal of Political…•1985

  • A Downsian Spatial Model with Party Activism

    Open Access•John H Aldrich•American Political Science Review•1983

  • Voter Participation and Strategic Uncertainty

    Open Access•Thomas R Palfrey, Howard Rosenthal et al.•American Political Science Review•1985

  • Candidate Motivation

    Open Access•Donald Wittman•American Political Science Review•1983

Unique citing works56
Citations per year1,81
Citation span1995 - 2019 (25)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 56

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae