Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Endogenous Beliefs in Models of Politics

Bibliographic Data

ID6231097
AuthorsWilliam Minozzi (0000-0001-9147-1788, The Ohio State University, corresponding author)
Year2013
Volume57
Issue3
Pages566-581
Publication date2013-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0092-5853 • E-ISSN: 1540-5907
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/ajps.12021
OpenAlexW2152139883
LanguageEN
Citations received19
References cited59

In the standard rational choice model, actors have exogenously given beliefs that perfectly match objective probabilities. As such, these beliefs cannot be optimistic or motivated by preferences, even though substantial empirical evidence indicates that human beliefs routinely satisfy neither of these criteria. I present a tractable Endogenous Beliefs Model and apply it to three different political environments from across the subfields of political science. In the model, players form beliefs that maximize a utility function that represents preferences over outcomes and the anticipatory experience of uncertainty. Applications include voter turnout, taxation and collective choice, and crisis bargaining. The model captures the empirical evidence about belief formation much better than the standard model. Moreover, these applications show how rigidly insisting on the standard rational choice model rejects otherwise reasonable explanations by fiat, precisely because of its implausible assumptions about beliefs

Econometrics · Economics · Empirical evidence · Epistemology · Function (biology · Microeconomics · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Rational choice theory (criminology · Rational expectations · Turnout · Voting · Economic Policies and Impacts · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Psychology

  • Deliberative Democracy between Theory and Practice

    Open Access•Michael A Neblo•Deliberative Democracy Between…•2015

  • “I alone can fix it

    Carlo M Horz, Korhan Kocak•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2026

  • Simple and Formal Models in Comparative Politics

    Open Access•Andrew T Little, Thomas B Pepinsky•Chinese Political Science Review•2016

  • Inequality, conspiracy theories, and redistribution

    Open Access•Daiki Kishishita•European Journal of Political…•2025

  • Electoral Campaigns and Biased Perceptions of Voter Interests

    Open Access•Carlo M Horz, Eric S Dickson•American Journal of Political…•2024

  • A Model of Focusing in Political Choice

    Salvatore Nunnari, Jan Zápal•The Journal of Politics•2025

  • Are We in the Same Boat or Not? The Opposite Effects of Absolute and Relative Income Shifts on Redistributive Preferences

    Vittorio Mérola, Agnar Freyr Helgason•The Journal of Politics•2016

  • Explaining Preferences from Behavior

    Avidit Acharya, Matthew Blackwell et al.•The Journal of Politics•2018

  • Emotions and Reputation Learning by Audience Networks

    Open Access•Moshe Maor, Dovilė Rimkutė et al.•Public Administration Review•2025

  • Poor people’s beliefs and the dynamics of clientelism

    Open Access•Miquel Pellicer, Eva Wegner et al.•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2021

  • A Bargaining Theory of Conflict with Evolutionary Preferences

    Open Access•Andrew T Little, Thomas Zeitzoff•International Organization•2017

  • Information, Uncertainty, and War

    Kristopher W Ramsay, Kristopher Ramsay•Annual Review of Political Science•2017

  • The Distortion of Related Beliefs

    Open Access•Andrew T Little•American Journal of Political…•2019

  • Propaganda and Skepticism

    Open Access•Carlo M Horz•American Journal of Political…•2021

  • Dynamics of Polarization

    Open Access•Daniel Diermeier, Christopher Li•British Journal of Political…•2023

  • Ideology for the Future

    Open Access•Francesco Izzo•American Political Science Review•2023

  • Anger and Political Conflict Dynamics

    Open Access•Keith E Schnakenberg, Carly N Wayne•American Political Science Review•2024

  • Motivated Reasoning and Democratic Accountability

    Open Access•Andrew T Little, Keith E Schnakenberg et al.•American Political Science Review•2022

  • Experimentation and Persuasion in Political Organizations

    Open Access•Alexander V Hirsch•American Political Science Review•2016

  • Taxation and democracy

    Sven Steinmo•Taxation and democracy•1993

  • The Causes of War

    Open Access•Geoffrey Blainey•The Causes of War•1988

  • Overconfidence and War

    Open Access•Dominic D P Johnson, Dominic Johnson•Overconfidence and War•2004

  • Disappointment and Dynamic Consistency in Choice under Uncertainty

    Graham Loomes, Robert Sugden•The Review of Economic Studies•1986

  • Are we all less risky and more skillful than our fellow drivers?

    Open Access•Ola Svenson•Acta Psychologica•1981

  • Disappointment in Decision Making Under Uncertainty

    David E Bell•Operations Research•1985

  • Epistemic Conditions for Nash Equilibrium

    Robert J Aumann, Robert Aumann et al.•Econometrica•1995

  • Decision Affect Theory

    Open Access•Barbara A Mellers, A Schwartz et al.•Psychological Science•1997

  • Optimal Expectations

    Markus K Brunnermeier, Jonathan A Parker•American Economic Review•2005

  • Reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games

    Open Access•Reinhard Selten•International Journal of Game…•1975

  • Psychological Expected Utility Theory and Anticipatory Feelings

    Andrew Caplin, John Leahy•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•2001

  • A Theory of Political Transitions

    Daron Acemoglu, James A Robinson•American Economic Review•2001

  • A Definition of Subjective Probability

    Open Access•F J Anscombe, Robert J Aumann•The Annals of Mathematical…•1963

  • Money, Kisses, and Electric Shocks

    Open Access•Yuval Rottenstreich, Christopher K Hsee•Psychological Science•2001

  • Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes

    Open Access•I LAKATOS, И Лакатос•Criticism and the Growth of…•1970

  • The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice

    Open Access•Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman•Science•1981

  • Social Mobility and the Demand for Redistribution

    Roland Bénabou, Efe A Ok•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•2001

  • Equality and Efficiency

    Open Access•Russell Keat•Philosophical Books•1980

  • Causes of War

    Stephen Van Evera•Causes of War•2019

  • Preferences for redistribution in the land of opportunities

    Open Access•Alberto Alesina, Eliana La Ferrara•Journal of Public Economics•2005

  • Elements of Reason

    Open Access•Arthur Lupia, Mathew D Mccubbins et al.•Elements of Reason•2000

  • Conservatism in human information processing

    Open Access•Ward Edwards•Judgment under uncertainty•1982

  • The Theory of Committees and Elections

    Open Access•Duncan Black, Georg Kunze•Theory of Committees and Elections•1986

  • A strategic calculus of voting

    Open Access•Thomas R Palfrey, Howard L Rosenthal•Public Choice•1983

  • A Rational Theory of the Size of Government

    Allan H Meltzer, Scott F Richard•Journal of Political Economy•1981

  • Anticipation and the Valuation of Delayed Consumption

    G Loewenstein•The Economic Journal•1987

  • Myths of Empire

    Jack Snyder•Myths of Empire•2018

  • Why Doesn't the United States Have a European-Style Welfare State

    Alberto Alesina, Edward L Glaeser et al.•Brookings Papers on Economic…•2001

  • Deliberation as Self-Discovery and Institutions for Political Speech

    Open Access•Catherine Hafer, Dimitri Landa•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2007

  • A Model of the Endogenous Development of Judicial Institutions in Federal and International Systems

    Clifford J Carrubba•The Journal of Politics•2009

  • Partisan Bias and the Bayesian Ideal in the Study of Public Opinion

    John G Bullock•The Journal of Politics•2009

  • Hot Cognition or Cool Consideration? Testing the Effects of Motivated Reasoning on Political Decision Making

    David P Redlawsk•The Journal of Politics•2002

  • Bizarre Beliefs and Rational Choices

    John W Schiemann•The Journal of Politics•2007

  • When Should Political Scientists Use the Self-Confirming Equilibrium Concept? Benefits, Costs, and an Application to Jury Theorems

    Open Access•Arthur Lupia, Adam Seth Levine et al.•Political Analysis•2010

  • Rational Choice Epistemology and Belief Formation in Mass Politics

    Open Access•Eric S Dickson•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2006

  • Bargaining and the Nature of War

    Open Access•Alastair Smith, Allan C Stam et al.•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2004

  • Rationalist explanations for war

    Open Access•James D Fearon•International Organization•1995

  • Mechanism of Motivated Reasoning? Analogical Perception in Discrimination Disputes

    Open Access•Eileen Braman, Thomas E Nelson•American Journal of Political…•2007

  • Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs

    Open Access•Charles S Taber, Milton Lodge•American Journal of Political…•2006

  • When Can Politicians Scare Citizens Into Supporting Bad Policies

    Open Access•Arthur Lupia, Jesse O Menning•American Journal of Political…•2009

  • The New Political Economy of Taxation in Advanced Capitalist Democracies

    Duane Swank, Sven Steinmo•American Journal of Political…•2002

  • Mutual Optimism and War

    Open Access•Mark Fey, Kristopher W Ramsay et al.•American Journal of Political…•2007

  • Unrealistic optimism about future life events

    Neil D Weinstein•Journal of Personality and Social…•1980

  • The unbearable automaticity of being

    John A Bargh, Tanya L Chartrand•American Psychologist•1999

  • The case for motivated reasoning

    Ziva Kunda•Psychological Bulletin•1990

  • Government Formation and Endogenous Parties

    Open Access•David P Baron•American Political Science Review•1993

  • A Theory of Endogenous Institutional Change

    Open Access•Avner Greif, David D Laitin•American Political Science Review•2004

  • A Theory of the Calculus of Voting

    Open Access•William H Riker, Peter C Ordeshook•American Political Science Review•1968

  • An Asset Theory of Social Policy Preferences

    Open Access•Trine Iversen, Torben Iversen et al.•American Political Science Review•2001

  • Inequality, Social Insurance, and Redistribution

    Open Access•Karl Ove Moene, Michael Wallerstein•American Political Science Review•2001

Unique citing works19
Citations per year1,73
Citation span2015 - 2026 (12)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 19

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae