Policy Convergence in a Federal Judicial System
The Application of Intensified Scrutiny Doctrines by State Supreme Courts
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6232140 |
|---|---|
| Authors | John C Kilwein (0000-0001-6739-4639), Richard A Brisbin |
| Year | 1997 |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 122 |
| Publication date | 1997-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0092-5853 • E-ISSN: 1540-5907 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2111711 |
| OpenAlex | W2314741100 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 19 |
| References cited | 18 |
Theory: The study examines the ability of the middle-range theory of policy convergence to explain the degree of doctrinal convergence between relatively autonomous state supreme courts and the U.S. Supreme Court. Hypotheses: The article develops potential explanations of policy convergence to assess separately the state courts' convergence with policy content or doctrine established by the U.S. Supreme Court. The explanations of convergence are penetration, or state court response to a potential threat for a failure to converge with federal doctrine, emulation or convergence because the U.S. Supreme Court is a policy exemplar, elite networking, or convergence because of the extent of state court interconnection with national legal elites in a policy community, and harnonization or convergence when the state court justices share similar policy preferences with the U.S. Supreme Court. Methods: The study uses logit analysis on a sample of 1,040 state supreme court decisions about intensified scrutiny doctrine collected by the authors. Results: The results indicate that doctrinal convergence is a multifaceted event, influenced by the penetration of the U.S. Supreme Court's message to state courts, state court emulation of exemplars established by the U.S. Supreme Court, the political context of state court decision making, and the degree of harmony between the political commitments of the federal justices and state judges. However, elite socialization of state judges increased divergence from U.S. Supreme Court doctrines
Certiorari · Court of record · Doctrine · Majority opinion · Original jurisdiction · Political science · Scrutiny · State supreme court · Supreme court · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Legal and Constitutional Studies
State Courts, the U.S. Supreme Court, and the Protection of Civil Liberties
The Supreme Court as a Political Entrepreneur
The Ties that Bind Beyond the Battlefield
Judicial Innovation and Sexual Harassment Doctrine in the U.S. Courts of Appeals
Justice Without Borders
Isolating Policymaking in Domestic Violence Decision‐Making in the US State Courts of Last Resort
Expanding the Integrated Model of Judicial Decision Making
Measuring the Preferences of State Supreme Court Judges
Placing State Supreme Courts in State Politics
State Policy Innovation in Perspective
The Florida Supreme Court in the 2000 Presidential Election
Power Shift
Judicial Waivers of Parental Consent for Abortion
Leaders and Followers
The Relationship Between the Supreme Court and Parliament in Light of the Theory of Moves
Collisions at the Intersection of Gender, Race, and Class
Fear of Reversal as an Explanation of Lower Court Compliance
Reexamining Litigant Success in State Supreme Courts
Precedent, Parity, and Racial Discrimination
Judicial policies
Economy and Society
Patterns of Compliance With U.S. Supreme Court Rulings
Responses of Federal District Judges to Court of Appeals Policies
Prayer in the Public Schools
Reactions of State Supreme Courts to A U.S. Supreme Court Civil Liberties Decision
Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court
Models of State High Court Decision Making in Sex Discrimination Cases
Anticipatory Compliance with Supreme Court Rulings
Exploring the Participation of Organized Interests in State Court Litigation
The Influence of Stare Decisis on the Votes of United States Supreme Court Justices
Judicial Policy-Making and Implementation
The Role of State Supreme Courts in Judicial Policy Making
Patterns of Adoption of Tort Law Innovations
Supreme Court Impact on Compliance and Outcomes
Case Selection in Judicial Impact Research
Political Orientations, Social Backgrounds, and Role Perceptions of State Supreme Court Judges
The Supreme Court's Impact on the Law of Libel
| Unique citing works | 19 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,68 |
| Citation span | 1998 - 2025 (28) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 19 |