Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Prominence as a Determinant of Bargaining Outcomes

Bibliographic Data

ID6283680
AuthorsMelvin A Eisenberg (0000-0001-7710-2724, University of California, Berkeley), Michael E Patch (Department of Psychology California State University, Hayward)
Year1976
Volume20
Issue3
Pages523-538
Publication date1976-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Conflict Resolution (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-0027 • E-ISSN: 1552-8766
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/002200277602000307
OpenAlexW1975668573
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited15

An experiment designed to test Schelling's notion of prominence in conflict resolution varied the fairness of a mediator's suggestion and the opportunity to communicate. The conflict, drawn from one of Schelling's original examples, involved a hypothetical lost sum of money in which a mediator is called in to help settle the dispute between the loser and finder. It was predicted that the prominence effect would be strongest where the mediator's suggestion fell within accepted standards of fairness and where communication was prevented. Both predictions were generally confirmed as to frequency of specific outcomes, but mean outcomes did not seem to be affected by prominence. In addition, the use and functions of various kinds of norms in bargaining were discussed

Conflict resolution · Dispute resolution · Economics · Mediator · Political science · Test (biology · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Game Theory and Applications · Game Theory and Voting Systems · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Impression Management in Bargaining

    Dean G Pruitt, D Leasel Smith•Impression management theory and…•1981

  • Toward Appropriate Peace Research

    Open Access•Juargen Dedrlng•Peace & Change•1981

  • A Treasure Trove of Insights

    Open Access•Daniel Druckman, James A Wall•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2017

  • The Social Psychology of Groups

    John W Thibaut, John Thibaut et al.•Social Psychology of Groups•2017

  • Fights, Games, and Debates

    Anatol Rapoport•Fights, Games, and Debates•1974

  • Style of third party intervention, face-saving and bargaining behavior

    Open Access•Douglas Johnson, Douglas F Johnson et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•1972

  • Bargaining behavior. I. "Prominence" as a predictor of the outcome of games of agreement

    Open Access•Richard H Willis, Myron L Joseph•Journal of Conflict Resolution•1959

  • Conceptual and methodological considerations in the study of trust and suspicion

    Open Access•Herbert W Kee, Robert E Knox•Journal of Conflict Resolution•1970

  • Third Party Intervention and the Bargaining Behavior of Group Representatives

    Open Access•Jean M Bartunek, Alan A Benton et al.•Journal of Conflict Resolution•1975

  • The influence of the situation in interparty conflict

    Open Access•Daniel Druckman•Journal of Conflict Resolution•1971

  • Negotiation in leader and delegate groups

    Open Access•Margaret G Hermann, Nathan Kogan•Journal of Conflict Resolution•1968

  • Effects of representational roles and mediators on negotiation effectiveness

    Neil Vidmar•Journal of Personality and Social…•1971

  • Mediation as an aid to face saving in negotiation

    Dean G Pruitt, Douglas Johnson et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1970

  • Strategy and Collective Bargaining Negotiation

    G L S Shackle, Carl M Stevens•Industrial and Labor Relations…•1964

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,07
Citation span1981 - 2017 (37)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae