How ensembling AI and public managers improves decision-making
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6294675 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Florian Keppeler (0000-0002-5984-0114, Aarhus University), Jana Borchert (Zeppelin Universität gemeinnützige GmbH), Mogens Jin Pedersen (0000-0001-9428-3395, University of Copenhagen), Vibeke Lehmann Nielsen (0000-0002-8688-7305, Aarhus University) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 261-276 |
| Publication date | 2025-07-14 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1053-1858 • E-ISSN: 1477-9803 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/jopart/muaf009 |
| OpenAlex | W4409603614 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 86 |
Artificial intelligence (AI) applications transform public sector decision-making. However, most research conceptualizes AI as a form of specialized decision-support tool. In contrast, this study presents a different form of human-AI collaboration, the concept of human-AI ensembles, where public managers and AI tackle the same decision tasks, rather than specializing in certain subtasks. This is particularly relevant for many public sector decisions, where neither human nor AI predictions have a clear advantage over the other. We illustrate this within the context of public hiring, focusing on two key areas: (a) the potential of ensembling humans and AI to reduce biases and (b) the willingness of public managers to implement ensembling. Study 1 uses data from the assessment of profiles of real-life job candidates (n = 695) at the intersection of gender and ethnicity by public managers compared to AI. The exploratory linear regression results illustrate how ensembled decision-making may alleviate ethnic biases. The linear regression results of study 2, a preregistered survey experiment, show that public managers (n = 538 with four observations each) put equal weight on AI advice and human advice, and, when reminded of the unlawfulness of hiring discrimination, may even prioritize AI over human advice
Advice (programming · Context (archaeology · Ethnic group · Geography · Political science · Public relations · Public sector · Computer Science · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society · Psychology · Regulation and Compliance Studies · Artificial Intelligence · Law · Social Psychology
Beyond Adoption
A Blessing or a Curse? Generative AI, Administrative Burdens, and Policy Alienation in Street‐Level Bureaucracy
Hybrid images of generative AI
Re‐Imagining the Epistemic Possibilities of GPT for Public Administration Research in Competitive Settings
Public administration with , of , and through AI
Algorithmic discrimination in public service provision
Artificial Intelligence and Management
Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers
Discriminated by an algorithm
Overcoming Algorithm Aversion
The state of hiring discrimination
Managing Artificial Intelligence
Human Trust in Artificial Intelligence
Discrimination in the Age of Algorithms
What can machine learning do? Workforce implications
Meta-analysis of field experiments shows no change in racial discrimination in hiring over time
Beyond prediction
Clinical Versus Actuarial Judgment
When eliminating bias isn’t fair
Algorithm appreciation
Implementing AI in the public sector
AI-driven public services and the privacy paradox
Ethics of AI-Enabled Recruiting and Selection
Promises and Pitfalls of Algorithm Use by State Authorities
When combinations of humans and AI are useful
Legitimacy of Algorithmic Decision-Making
A systematic review of algorithm aversion in augmented decision making
Facing the human capital crisis
Digital discretion
Digital Discretion
The impact of using algorithms for managerial decisions on public employees' procedural justice
Governance of artificial intelligence
The Political Economy of Public Values
Just like I thought’
From Street‐Level to System‐Level Bureaucracies
Conceptualizing throughput legitimacy
Abstraction and Detail in Experimental Design
Accountable Artificial Intelligence
Searching for inclusive artificial intelligence for social good
How Much Should We Trust Estimates from Multiplicative Interaction Models? Simple Tools to Improve Empirical Practice
Which Clients are Deserving of Help? A Theoretical Model and Experimental Test
Human–AI Interactions in Public Sector Decision Making
Representative Bureaucracy and Attitudes Toward Automated Decision Making
No Thanks, Dear AI! Understanding the Effects of Disclosure and Deployment of Artificial Intelligence in Public Sector Recruitment
Representative Bureaucracy and Public Hiring Preferences
Algorithms, data, and platforms
Data science, artificial intelligence and the third wave of digital era governance
New Public Management Is Dead--Long Live Digital-Era Governance
How human-AI feedback loops alter human perceptual, emotional and social judgements
Decision-Making Processes in Social Contexts
Understanding Discrimination
| Citations per year | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |