Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Heeding to the Losers

Legislators' Trade‐Policy Preferences and Legislative Behavior

Bibliographic Data

ID6300477
AuthorsMaría Victoria Murillo (0000-0001-6972-4750, Columbia University), Paulo Moreira Pinto (0000-0002-4434-2112, University of Houston, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume47
Issue3
Pages539-603
Publication date2022-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLegislative Studies Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0362-9805 • E-ISSN: 1939-9162
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/lsq.12337
OpenAlexW3167462451
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited50

Electoral incentives affect legislators' responsiveness to voters, parties, and other stakeholders. Proportional representation (PR) electoral systems with party control over nominations foster party discipline and reduce legislators' responsiveness to local constituents when at odds with the party. Yet, even under closed‐list PR regimes policymakers have incentives to respond to local interests who help advance their political careers. We illustrate this argument using evidence from a survey of Argentine legislators and a roll‐call vote on a salient export tax bill. Despite the incentives created by the electoral regime, we find that legislators' trade‐policy preferences and legislative behavior reflect the expected consequences of trade on local constituents. Our evidence suggests that catering to voters, rather than organized interests, are more likely to motivate legislators to defy their parties. These findings underscore the importance of understanding when and how catering to local constituents can affect politicians’ trade policy choices

Affect (linguistics · Argument (complex analysis · Economics · Incentive · Legislature · Microeconomics · Odds · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Public economics · Representation (politics · Salient · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration · Social Policy and Reform Studies

  • Whose China Shock? Partisanship, import exposure, and trade rhetoric in the US Senate

    Open Access•Weitian Liu•Political Studies•2026

  • Collaborative Networks and Institutional Change

    Luciana Polischuk, Daniel L Fay•International Journal of Public…•2025

  • Business versus citizens

    Open Access•Andreas Dür, Robert A Huber et al.•European Political Science Review•2026

  • Tabling Debate

    Open Access•Mirya R Holman, Tyler Simko•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2025

  • What makes a legislator promote or thwart trade liberalization in developing democracies

    Open Access•Simón Lodato, Andrés Dockendorff et al.•Revista Brasileira de Política…•2025

  • Representation and Delegation in Trade Policymaking

    Open Access•Alejandro Bonvecchi, Paula Clerici•Studies in Comparative…•2024

  • Trade Competitiveness, Constituency Interests, and Legislators' Attitudes Towards Trade Agreements

    Open Access•Andreas Dür, Robert A Huber et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2024

  • Why do legislators rebel on trade agreements? The effect of constituencies’ economic interests

    Open Access•Yannick Stiller•European Political Science Review•2023

  • American Opinion on Trade

    Alexandra Guisinger•American opinion on trade•2017

  • Making Votes Count

    Open Access•Gary W Cox•Making Votes Count•1997

  • Legislative Voting and Accountability

    Open Access•John Michael Carey•Legislative voting and…•2008

  • Privileging Industry

    Fiona Mcgillivray•Privileging Industry•2004

  • From the Corn Laws to Free Trade

    Cheryl Schonhardt-Bailey•From the Corn Laws to Free Trade•2006

  • Ambition, Federalism, and Legislative Politics in Brazil

    Open Access•David Samuels•Ambition, Federalism, and…•2003

  • International Trade and Political Conflict

    Michael J Hiscox, Michael Hiscox•International Trade and Political…•2002

  • All Frames Are Not Created Equal

    Open Access•Irwin P Levin, Sandra L Schneider et al.•Organizational Behavior and Human…•1998

  • What determines individual trade-policy preferences?

    Open Access•Kenneth Scheve, Kenneth F Scheve et al.•Journal of International Economics•2001

  • Why are some people (and countries) more protectionist than others?

    Open Access•Anna Maria Mayda, Dani Rodrik•European Economic Review•2005

  • The Determinants of Individual Trade Policy Preferences

    Kevin H O''Rourke, Richard Sinnott et al.•Brookings Trade Forum•2001

  • Prospect Theory

    Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky•Econometrica•1979

  • Geography, International Trade, and Political Mobilization in U.S. Industries

    Marc L Busch, Marc Busch et al.•American Journal of Political…•2000

  • Can Learning Constituency Opinion Affect How Legislators Vote? Results from a Field Experiment

    Daniel M Butler, David W Nickerson•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2011

  • Winners and losers

    Jonathan Schulman•International Affairs•2022

  • The Symmetry between Import and Export Taxes

    A P Lerner•Economica•1936

  • The Institutional Roots of American Trade Policy

    Open Access•Michael A Bailey, Judith Goldstein et al.•World Politics•1997

  • Competing Rhetoric Over Time

    James N Druckman, Cari Lynn Hennessy et al.•The Journal of Politics•2010

  • On the Limits of Framing Effects

    James N Druckman•The Journal of Politics•2001

  • How Legislators Respond to Localized Economic Shocks

    James J Feigenbaum, Arnold Bennett Hall et al.•The Journal of Politics•2015

  • Public Opinion and American Democracy

    Robert Y Shapiro•Public Opinion Quarterly•2011

  • The Implications of Framing Effects for Citizen Competence

    Open Access•James N Druckman•Political Behavior•2001

  • Understanding Interaction Models

    Open Access•Thomas Brambor, William R Clark et al.•Political Analysis•2006

  • Ambition as a micro-foundation of party loyalty

    Open Access•Theresa Kernecker•Party Politics•2017

  • Disentangling the Role of Ideology and Partisanship in Legislative Voting

    Open Access•Eduardo Alemán, Juan Pablo Micozzi et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2018

  • The Subnational Connection in Unitary Regimes

    Open Access•Daniel Chasquetti, Juan Pablo Micozzi•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2014

  • Quiet Influence

    Open Access•Michael A Bailey, Michael Bailey•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2001

  • From House to Home

    Juan Pablo Micozzi•Journal of Legislative Studies•2014

  • Globalization and Welfare Spending

    Irene Menéndez González, Irene Menéndez•International Studies Quarterly•2016

  • Through a Glass and Darkly

    Michael J Hiscox, Michael Hiscox•International Organization•2006

  • Support for Free Trade

    Open Access•Edward D Mansfield, Diana C Mutz•International Organization•2009

  • Sensitivity to Issue Framing on Trade Policy Preferences

    Open Access•Martin Ardanaz, María Victoria Murillo et al.•International Organization•2013

  • Decision Maker Preferences for International Legal Cooperation

    Open Access•Emilie M Hafner-Burton, Emilie M Hafner‐burton et al.•International Organization•2014

  • Why Don't Trade Preferences Reflect Economic Self-Interest

    Open Access•Sungmin Rho, Michael Tomz•International Organization•2017

  • Alliance for Progress? Multilevel Ambition and Patterns of Cosponsorship in the Argentine House

    Open Access•Juan Pablo Micozzi•Comparative Political Studies•2014

  • Competing Principals, Political Institutions, and Party Unity in Legislative Voting

    Open Access•John Michael Carey•American Journal of Political…•2007

  • Looking for Locals

    Open Access•Matthew Soberg Shugart, Melody E Valdini et al.•American Journal of Political…•2005

  • A Bottom‐Up Theory of Public Opinion about Foreign Policy

    Open Access•Joshua D Kertzer, Thomas Zeitzoff•American Journal of Political…•2017

  • Government and Opposition in the Argentine Congress, 1989-2007

    Open Access•Mark P Jones, Wonjae Hwang et al.•Journal of Politics in Latin…•2009

  • Framing Theory

    D Chong, James N Druckman•Annual Review of Political Science•2007

  • Incentives to cultivate a personal vote

    Open Access•John Michael Carey, Matthew Soberg Shugart•Electoral Studies•1995

  • Local Economic Voting and the Agricultural Boom in Argentina, 2007-2015

    Open Access•Jorge Mangonnet, María Victoria Murillo et al.•Latin American Politics and Society•2018

Unique citing works8
Citations per year2,67
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 8

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae