Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Unilateral Inaction

Congressional Gridlock, Interbranch Conflict, and Public Evaluations of Executive Power

Bibliographic Data

ID6301147
AuthorsAndrew Reeve (0000-0001-7217-6601, Washington University in St. Louis), Andrew Reeves (0000-0002-3728-6757, Washington University in St. Louis), Jon C Rogowski (0000-0003-4547-3832, University of Chicago, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume47
Issue2
Pages427-457
Publication date2022-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLegislative Studies Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0362-9805 • E-ISSN: 1939-9162
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/lsq.12353
OpenAlexW3169785250
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited49

Presidents routinely overpromise and underdeliver, especially amid partisan polarization, narrow congressional majorities, and persistent gridlock. As Congress routinely stymies their legislative agendas, presidents consider alternative courses of action. We study public reactions to unilateral power in the context of congressional inaction. While some research suggests that presidents cannot afford to pass up opportunities to act, more recent scholarship indicates that the public holds negative views of unilateral power and disapproves of its use. Survey experiments conducted with a national sample of Americans provide evidence of the costs of unilateral power. Across three policy areas and between‐ and within‐respondent analyses, the public responds negatively when presidents exercise unilateral power rather than accept the status quo, even among individuals who share the president's policy views. Our results suggest that while legislative gridlock may increase the appeal of unilateral power, its use may come at a public cost

Context (archaeology · Gridlock · Legislature · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Presidency · Respondent · Status quo · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research

  • Bipartisanship and US Foreign Policy

    Jordan Tama•Bipartisanship and US Foreign…•2023

  • Acting(s) without consequence

    Open Access•David Ryan Miller, Chris Piper•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2024

  • Unilateral Power for Saving Lives

    Open Access•Takaharu Saito•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2025

  • Public Responses to Unilateral Policymaking

    Open Access•Benjamin Goehring, Kenneth Lowande•Journal of Experimental Political…•2024

  • Congress in Reverse

    Jordan M Ragusa, Jordan Ragusa et al.•Congress in Reverse•2020

  • Thinking about the Presidency

    William G Howell, David Milton Brent•Thinking about the Presidency•2013

  • Stealth Democracy

    Open Access•John R Hibbing, Elizabeth Theiss-Morse et al.•Stealth Democracy•2002

  • Managing the President's Program

    Andrew Rudalevige•Managing the President's Program•2002

  • Power without Persuasion

    William G Howell•Power Without Persuasion•2003

  • War and Democratic Constraint

    Matthew A Baum, Philip B K Potter•War and Democratic Constraint•2015

  • Pushing the Agenda

    Open Access•Matthew N Beckmann•Pushing the Agenda•2010

  • Veto Bargaining

    Open Access•Charles M Cameron•Veto Bargaining•2000

  • Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians

    Open Access•James D Fearon•Democracy, Accountability, and…•1999

  • Logistic or linear? Estimating causal effects of experimental treatments on binary outcomes using regression analysis.

    Robin Gomila•Journal of Experimental…•2021

  • Polarized America

    Adam Bonica, Howard Rosenthal et al.•Polarized America•2016

  • Pivotal Politics

    Keith Krehbiel•Pivotal Politics•1998

  • Insecure Majorities

    Frances E Lee, Frances Lee•Insecure Majorities•2016

  • Studying the Polarized Presidency

    Open Access•Charles M Cameron•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2002

  • Public Perception of the Presidential Toolkit

    Open Access•Kenneth Lowande, Thomas Gray•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2017

  • Public Opinion Toward Presidential Power

    Open Access•Andrew Reeve, Andrew Reeves et al.•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2015

  • Unilateral Action and Presidential Accountability

    Open Access•Stephen Ansolabehere, Stephen D Ansolabehere et al.•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2020

  • Up the Hill and Across the Aisle

    Open Access•Matthew N Beckmann•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2016

  • The Electoral Cost of War

    David Karol, Edward Miguel•The Journal of Politics•2007

  • Partisan Bias, Political Information and Spatial Voting in the 2008 Presidential Election

    Steve Jessee, Stephen A Jessee•The Journal of Politics•2010

  • Dividers, Not Uniters

    Frances E Lee, Frances Lee•The Journal of Politics•2008

  • Unilateral Powers, Public Opinion, and the Presidency

    Andrew Reeve, Andrew Reeves et al.•The Journal of Politics•2016

  • Why Do People Accept Public Policies They Oppose? Testing Legitimacy Theory with a Survey-Based Experiment

    Open Access•James L Gibson, Gregory A Caldeira et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2005

  • Legislative Constraints on Executive Unilateralism in Separation of Powers Systems

    Open Access•Michael Barber, Alexander Bolton et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2019

  • Public Preferences for Bipartisanship in the Policymaking Process

    Open Access•Laurel Harbridge, N Malhotra et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2014

  • Rewarding Dysfunction

    Open Access•Jeremy Gelman•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2017

  • Strategic Position Taking and Presidential Influence in Congress

    Open Access•Bryan W Marshall, Baukje Prins et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2007

  • Legislative cohesion and presidential policy success

    Barbara Sinclair•Journal of Legislative Studies•2003

  • Presidential Unilateral Power

    Open Access•Kenneth Lowande, Jon C Rogowski•Annual Review of Political Science•2021

  • The Dysfunctional Congress

    Sarah Binder•Annual Review of Political Science•2015

  • The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court

    Gregory A Caldeira, James L Gibson•American Journal of Political…•1992

  • The Politics of Blame

    Tim Groseclose, Nolan Mccarty•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • Mobilizing the Public Against the President

    Open Access•D P Christenson, Douglas L Kriner•American Journal of Political…•2017

  • To Revoke or Not Revoke? The Political Determinants of Executive Order Longevity

    Open Access•Sharece Thrower•American Journal of Political…•2017

  • Constitutional Qualms or Politics as Usual? The Factors Shaping Public Support for Unilateral Action

    Open Access•D P Christenson, Douglas L Kriner•American Journal of Political…•2017

  • Leadership and Pandering

    Brandice Canes-Wrone, Michael C Herron et al.•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • The Conditional Nature of Presidential Responsiveness to Public Opinion

    Brandice Canes-Wrone, Brandice Canes‐wrone et al.•American Journal of Political…•2004

  • The Public Cost of Unilateral Action

    Open Access•Andrew Reeve, Andrew Reeves et al.•American Journal of Political…•2018

  • Americans’ Attitudes About the Senate Filibuster

    Open Access•Stephanie S Smith, Steven S Smith et al.•American Politics Research•2013

  • The President, Congress, and Legislation

    Open Access•Lawrence H Chamberlain•Political Science Quarterly•1946

  • Accountability for the Local Economy at All Levels of Government in United States Elections

    Open Access•Justin De Benedictis-Kessner, Carole Warshaw•American Political Science Review•2020

  • Spatial Voting in the 2004 Presidential Election

    Open Access•Steve Jessee, Stephen A Jessee•American Political Science Review•2009

  • Dynamic Representation

    Open Access•James A Stimson, James Stimson et al.•American Political Science Review•1995

  • The Congress, the Executive and Intermestic Affairs

    Bayless Manning•Foreign Affairs•1977

  • Presidential Popularity from Truman to Johnson

    Open Access•Joanne Mueller, John E Mueller•American Political Science Review•1970

  • Increasing Precision without Altering Treatment Effects

    Open Access•Clifford, Geoffrey Sheagley et al.•American Political Science Review•2021

Unique citing works4
Citations per year1,33
Citation span2023 - 2025 (3)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae