Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Issue Politics in a Polarized Congress

Bibliographic Data

ID6340758
AuthorsAshley E Jochim (University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA), Ashley Jochim (University of Washington), Bryan D Jones (University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA)
Year2013
Volume66
Issue2
Pages352-369
Publication date2013-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitical Research Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1065-9129 • E-ISSN: 1938-274X
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1065912912448930
OpenAlexW2089666003
LanguageEN
Citations received29
References cited31

The standard explanation for increasing party polarization in Congress is based on factors that would affect all policy issues simultaneously. We show that this has not happened. We examine the dimensionality of legislative choice in the House of Representatives, scaling eighteen issues in each Congress from 1965 through 2004. We detect considerable variability in issue dimensionality, an evolution in the structure of choice over time, and changes in the relationship between party unity and issue dimensionality. Our findings suggest that polarization has occurred on an issue-by-issue basis, reinvigorating the debate over the role of policy substance in shaping congressional politics

Curse of dimensionality · House of Representatives · Law and economics · Legislature · Polarization (electrochemistry · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Policy Transfer and Learning · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration · Artificial Intelligence

  • Personal experiences bridge moral and political divides better than facts

    Open Access•Emily Kubin, Curtis Puryear et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2021

  • Bipartisanship and US Foreign Policy

    Jordan Tama•Bipartisanship and US Foreign…•2023

  • Is high-intensity conflict escalation inevitable in the future? A two-level game analysis on the causes of US-Iran risky rivalry

    Open Access•Yaohui Wang, Richard Xuetao Wang et al.•European Journal of Futures…•2024

  • Gendered Polarization and Abortion Policymaking in the States

    Open Access•Abigail A Matthews, Rebecca J Kreitzer et al.•The Forum•2020

  • Non‐policy making

    Open Access•Devin Fernandes•Review of Policy Research•2024

  • The prevalence of bipartisanship in U.S. foreign policy

    Open Access•James D Bryan, Jordan Tama•International Politics•2021

  • Is Neutrality a Feature or a Bug? Delegation, Discretion, and the Democratic Implications of Administrative Law in a Polarized Institutional Environment

    Donald M Gooch, Peyton E Wofford•Administrative Theory & Praxis•2017

  • Shared Pain, Common Purpose

    Open Access•Robert J Mcgrath•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2025

  • The Partisanship of House Committees and Member Self‐Selection

    Open Access•James M Ryan•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2020

  • Public Pension Governance and Opportunistic Accounting Choice

    Open Access•Odd J Stalebrink, Pierre Donatella•The American Review of Public…•2020

  • Welfare, egalitarianism, and polarization

    Open Access•Eric Paul Svensen•Journal of Public Policy•2024

  • Partisanship, Political Polarization, and State Higher Education Budget Outcomes

    Luciana Dar, Dong-Wook Lee et al.•The Journal of Higher Education•2014

  • Marching Orders? U.S. Party Platforms and Legislative Agenda Setting 1948–2014

    Open Access•E J Fagan•Political Research Quarterly•2018

  • National Policies, Agendas, and Polarization in American State Legislatures

    Open Access•Alex Garlick•American Politics Research•2017

  • Narrative policy images

    Open Access•Harold L Peterson•Policy Studies Journal•2021

  • The decline of incrementalism in U.S. lawmaking

    Open Access•Jennifer Lewallen•Policy Studies Journal•2024

  • The politics of problems versus solutions

    Open Access•Jennifer Lewallen, Ju Yeon Park et al.•Policy Studies Journal•2024

  • The influence of conflict on agenda setting in the US Congress

    Jennifer Lewallen, Jonathan Lewallen•Policy & Politics•2025

  • Interest Groups on the Inside

    Open Access•Sarah F Anzia, Terry M Moe•Perspectives on Politics•2019

  • Polarization and Policy

    Open Access•Sarah F Anzia, Terry M Moe•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2017

  • Multiple Ideal Points

    Open Access•Scott Moser, Abel Rodríguez et al.•Political Analysis•2021

  • Modeling Issue Definitions Using Quantitative Text Analysis

    Open Access•Matthew C Nowlin•Policy Studies Journal•2016

  • Policy Regime Decay

    Open Access•Adam Sheingate•Policy Studies Journal•2022

  • Elite-level issue dynamics

    Open Access•Daniel J Lee, Rachel A Schutte•Party Politics•2017

  • Partisan Governance and Minority Party Vetoes

    Open Access•Robert L Oldham, Robert Oldham•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2024

  • The Policy Substance of Legislative Ideology

    Open Access•Adam Cayton•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2021

  • Policy and the structure of roll call voting in the US house

    Open Access•Scott De Marchi, Spencer Dorsey et al.•Journal of Public Policy•2021

  • The Dynamic Model of Choice for Public Policy Reconsidered

    Jens Ledet Jensen, Peter Bjerre Mortensen et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2016

  • Minority Party Capacity in Congress

    Open Access•Andrew O Ballard, James M Curry•American Political Science Review•2021

  • Party and constituency

    Julius Turner•Party and constituency•1970

  • Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting

    Open Access•Keith T Poole•Spatial Models of Parliamentary…•2005

  • Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House

    David W Rohde•Parties and leaders in the…•1991

  • Party Polarization in Congress

    Open Access•Sean M Theriault•Party Polarization in Congress•2008

  • Agendas and Instability in American Politics, Second Edition

    F R Baumgartner, Bryan D Jones•Agendas and Instability in…•2009

  • Committees in Congress

    Christopher J Deering, Christopher Deering et al.•Committees in Congress•1997

  • Setting the Agenda

    Open Access•Gary W Cox, Mathew D Mccubbins•Setting the Agenda•2005

  • Why Parties?

    John H Aldrich•Why Parties?•1995

  • Party Influence in Congress

    Open Access•Stephanie S Smith, Steven S Smith•Party Influence in Congress•2007

  • Linear Probability Models of the Demand for Attributes with an Empirical Application to Estimating the Preferences of Legislators

    Open Access•James J Heckman, Jane Mcintosh Snyder et al.•The RAND Journal of Economics•1997

  • Issue Evolution

    E G Carmines, James A Stimson•Issue Evolution•2020

  • Perpetuating the Pork Barrel

    Open Access•Robert M Stein, Kenneth N Bickers•Perpetuating the Pork Barrel•1995

  • Procedural Contexts, Party Strategy, and Conditional Party Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1971–2000

    Open Access•Jason M Roberts, Stephanie S Smith et al.•American Journal of Political…•2003

  • Beyond Ideology

    Frances E Lee, Frances Lee•Beyond Ideology•2009

  • The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors

    Raymond B Cattell•Multivariate Behavioral Research•1966

  • Models of Legislative Voting

    John W Kingdon•The Journal of Politics•1977

  • Dimensions, Issues, and Bills

    Michael H Crespin, David W Rohde•The Journal of Politics•2010

  • Setting the Legislative Agenda

    Jeffery C Talbert, Jeffery Talbert et al.•The Journal of Politics•2002

  • The Dimensional Structure of Policy Outputs

    Open Access•Matthew Potoski, Jeffery Talbert•Political Research Quarterly•2000

  • D-Nominate after 10 Years

    Open Access•Keith T Poole, Howard Rosenthal et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2001

  • Tactical Maneuvering on Omnibus Bills in Congress

    Glen S Krutz, Glen Krutz•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • Committee Power, Structure-Induced Equilibria, and Roll Call Votes

    Jane Mcintosh Snyder, James M Snyder•American Journal of Political…•1992

  • Ideology, Interest Group Scores, and Legislative Votes

    J E Jackson, John W Kingdon•American Journal of Political…•1992

  • The Role of Economic Reliance in Defense Procurement Contracting

    Open Access•Rebecca U Thorpe, Rebecca Thorpe•American Politics Research•2010

  • A Method for Identifying Issues and Factions from Legislative Votes

    Open Access•Duncan Macrae•American Political Science Review•1965

  • A Comparative Analysis of Senate-House Voting on Economic and Welfare Policy, 1953-1964

    Open Access•Aage R Clausen, Richard B Cheney•American Political Science Review•1970

  • Distributive and Partisan Issues in Agriculture Policy in the 104th House

    Open Access•Mark S Hurwitz, Roger J Moiles et al.•American Political Science Review•2001

Unique citing works29
Citations per year2,42
Citation span2014 - 2025 (12)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 29

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae