Civic Solitude
Why Democracy Needs Distance
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6574401 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Robert B Talisse (0000-0002-0599-3895, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Pages | 192 |
| Publication date | 2024-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | BOOK |
| Venue | Civic Solitude (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press, Incorporated (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/9780197752197.001.0001 |
| OpenAlex | W4402882846 |
| Open Library | OL56880561M |
| ISBN | 9780197752166, 9780197752197 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 112 |
“This is what democracy looks like.” An internet search of that phrase returns thousands of images of people assembled in public to convey a common political sentiment. This makes good sense. Without active citizens, democracy devolves into rule by elites or worse. Public collective action is essential to democracy. Although the images are inspiring, they also present a problem. In addition to being politically active, democratic citizens must be reflective. Their political advocacy must be informed by the perspectives of their fellow citizens. The trouble is that indispensable modes of democratic participation can corrode citizens’ reflective capacities. The culprit is a dynamic called belief polarization. As we interact with our allies, we are exposed to forces that render us more radical in our beliefs and increasingly hostile to those who do not share them. What’s more, we are surrounded by triggers of political extremity and animosity. Thus, our ordinary activities encourage the attitude that democracy is possible only when everyone agrees. That’s a profoundly antidemocratic stance. Drawing on extensive research about polarization and partisanship, Robert Talisse argues that certain core democratic capacities can be cultivated only at a distance from the political fray. If we are to meet the responsibilities of democratic citizenship, we must occasionally step away from our allies and opponents alike. This can be achieved only in secluded settings where we can engage in civic reflection that is not prepackaged in the idiom of our political divides
Art · Literature · Solitude · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · History · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Social Media and Politics
The Space between Us
Republic
Democracy When the People Are Thinking
The Political Value of Time
From Politics to the Pews
The Case for Rage
The Partisan Sort
Uncivil Agreement
At Least Bias Is Bipartisan
Discussion Effects on Racial Attitudes
The promise and pitfalls of cross-partisan conversations for reducing affective polarization
Ideological asymmetries in conformity, desire for shared reality, and the spread of misinformation
Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization
On the People's Terms
Being Sure of Each Other
Why It’s OK to Ignore Politics
Liberalism and the Limits of Justice
One Another’s Equals
Moral Principles and Political Obligations
Mere Civility
Utilitarianism
Free Time
Democracy for Busy People
Going to Extremes
Insecure Majorities
Perceiving Political Polarization in the United States
Rediscovering the Social Group
Democracy for Realists
Radical American Partisanship
A Social Identity Theory of Leadership
Open Democracy
Knowing what to think by knowing who you are
Hearing the Other Side
The Common Ingroup Identity Model
Unintentional Gerrymandering
There is an ‘I’ in truth
Twelve Key Findings in Deliberative Democracy Research
Social Corroboration and Opinion Extremity
Risky and cautious shifts in group decisions
Voter Migration and the Geographic Sorting of the American Electorate
Newspaper Coverage of Political Scandals
Does Media Coverage of Partisan Polarization Affect Political Attitudes
Discussion-Induced Attitude Polarization
Deindividuation Effects on Group Polarization in Computer-Mediated Communication
The enfranchisement lottery
Are knowledgeable voters better voters
What are the chances you’re right about everything? An epistemic challenge for modern partisanship
Election Night’s Alright for Fighting
The Parties in Our Heads
(Mis)estimating Affective Polarization
The Home as a Political Fortress
Political Homophily in Social Relationships
Polarization in the American Public
The Workplace as a Context for Cross-Cutting Political Discourse
Self-Fulfilling Misperceptions of Public Polarization
Is Polarization a Myth
Intergroup contact reduces affective polarization but not among strong party identifiers
Ideologues without Issues
Does Deliberation Breed an Appetite for Discursive Participation? Assessing the Impact of First-Hand Experience
Emotional Rescue
One Tribe to Bind Them All
The Strengthening of Partisan Affect
Political Consequences of Partisan Prejudice
Unreflective Partisans? Policy Information and Evaluation in the Development of Partisanship
Can Interparty Contact Reduce Affective Polarization? A Systematic Test of Different Forms of Intergroup Contact
How the Politicization of Everyday Activities Affects the Public Sphere
Partisanship as a Social Identity
Motivated Reasoning and Yard-Sign-Stealing Partisans
When Corrections Fail
The Correlates of Discord
Affective Polarization and Misinformation Belief
The Politics of Beauty
Partisan Differences in Nonpartisan Activity
The Dating Preferences of Liberals and Conservatives
Against Elections
The tie that divides
Reflections onHearing the Other Side, in Theory and in Practice
Democracy without shortcuts
Fear and Loathing across Party Lines
How Getting the Facts Right Can Fuel Partisan‐Motivated Reasoning
Party Polarization and "Conflict Extension" in the American Electorate
The Economic Consequences of Partisanship in a Polarized Era
Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs
The Nature of Affective Polarization
The group as a polarizer of attitudes
Party Over Policy
The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States
Bowling Alone
The Secret Lives of Liberals and Conservatives
I Disrespectfully Agree
Political Polarization in the American Public
Affect, Not Ideology
A Polarized Environment
Affective polarization in multiparty systems
Facts and Myths about Misperceptions
Solace for the Frustrations of Silent Citizenship
Deepening the rift
The measurement of partisan sorting for 180 million voters
Interventions reducing affective polarization do not necessarily improve anti-democratic attitudes
Who Wants To Deliberate-And Why
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 5 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |