Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Civic Solitude

Why Democracy Needs Distance

Bibliographic Data

ID6574401
AuthorsRobert B Talisse (0000-0002-0599-3895, corresponding author)
Year2024
Pages192
Publication date2024-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeBOOK
VenueCivic Solitude (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherOxford University Press, Incorporated (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/9780197752197.001.0001
OpenAlexW4402882846
Open LibraryOL56880561M
ISBN9780197752166, 9780197752197
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited112

“This is what democracy looks like.” An internet search of that phrase returns thousands of images of people assembled in public to convey a common political sentiment. This makes good sense. Without active citizens, democracy devolves into rule by elites or worse. Public collective action is essential to democracy. Although the images are inspiring, they also present a problem. In addition to being politically active, democratic citizens must be reflective. Their political advocacy must be informed by the perspectives of their fellow citizens. The trouble is that indispensable modes of democratic participation can corrode citizens’ reflective capacities. The culprit is a dynamic called belief polarization. As we interact with our allies, we are exposed to forces that render us more radical in our beliefs and increasingly hostile to those who do not share them. What’s more, we are surrounded by triggers of political extremity and animosity. Thus, our ordinary activities encourage the attitude that democracy is possible only when everyone agrees. That’s a profoundly antidemocratic stance. Drawing on extensive research about polarization and partisanship, Robert Talisse argues that certain core democratic capacities can be cultivated only at a distance from the political fray. If we are to meet the responsibilities of democratic citizenship, we must occasionally step away from our allies and opponents alike. This can be achieved only in secluded settings where we can engage in civic reflection that is not prepackaged in the idiom of our political divides

Art · Literature · Solitude · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · History · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Social Media and Politics

  • Reclaiming our republic

    Open Access•Brooke Hubsch, Mary Stuckey•Communication and Democracy•2026

  • From truth to post-truth

    Andrew Howat•Inquiry•2026

  • Subjunctive Civility and the Self-work that Strengthens Democracy

    Open Access•Karim Sadek, Christian Golden•Ethical Theory and Moral Practice•2026

  • Personal and Relational Responses to Polarization

    Eduardo J Martinez•Critical Review•2026

  • Distance and Democracy

    Diana C Mutz•Critical Review•2026

  • The Space between Us

    Open Access•Ryan D Enos•The space between us•2017

  • Republic

    Cass R Sunstein•#Republic•2017

  • Democracy When the People Are Thinking

    James S Fishkin, James Fishkin•Democracy When the People Are…•2018

  • The Political Value of Time

    Elizabeth F Cohen•Political Value of Time•2018

  • From Politics to the Pews

    Michele F Margolis, Michele Margolis•From Politics to the Pews•2018

  • The Case for Rage

    Myisha Cherry•Case for Rage•2021

  • The Partisan Sort

    Matthew Levendusky•Partisan Sort•2009

  • Uncivil Agreement

    L Mason•Uncivil agreement•2018

  • At Least Bias Is Bipartisan

    Open Access•Peter H Ditto, Brittany S Liu et al.•Perspectives on Psychological…•2019

  • Discussion Effects on Racial Attitudes

    Open Access•David G Myers, George D Bishop•Science•1970

  • The promise and pitfalls of cross-partisan conversations for reducing affective polarization

    Open Access•Erik Santoro, David E Broockman•Science Advances•2022

  • Ideological asymmetries in conformity, desire for shared reality, and the spread of misinformation

    Open Access•John T Jost, Sander Van Der Linden et al.•Current Opinion in Psychology•2018

  • Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization

    Open Access•Christopher A Bail, Chris Bail et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2018

  • On the People's Terms

    Open Access•Philip Pettit•On the People's Terms•2012

  • Being Sure of Each Other

    Kimberley Brownlee•Being Sure of Each Other•2020

  • Why It’s OK to Ignore Politics

    Christopher Freiman•Why It's OK to Ignore Politcs•2020

  • Liberalism and the Limits of Justice

    Open Access•Michael J Sandel•Liberalism and the Limits of…•1998

  • One Another’s Equals

    Jeremy Waldron•One Another's Equals•2017

  • Moral Principles and Political Obligations

    Open Access•A John Simmons•Moral Principles and Political…•1980

  • Mere Civility

    Teresa M Bejan•Mere Civility•2017

  • Utilitarianism

    Bernard Williams, J J C Smart•Utilitarianism•2013

  • Free Time

    Open Access•Julie L Rose, Julie Rose•Free Time•2016

  • Democracy for Busy People

    Kevin J Elliott•Democracy for Busy People•2022

  • Going to Extremes

    Cass R Sunstein•Going to extremes•2009

  • Insecure Majorities

    Frances E Lee, Frances Lee•Insecure Majorities•2016

  • Perceiving Political Polarization in the United States

    Open Access•Jacob Westfall, Leaf Van Boven et al.•Perspectives on Psychological…•2015

  • Rediscovering the Social Group

    Open Access•Fraser Reid•British Journal of Social…•1987

  • Democracy for Realists

    Christopher H Achen, Larry M Bartels•Democracy for Realists•2016

  • Radical American Partisanship

    Nathan P Kalmoe, L Mason•Radical American Partisanship•2022

  • A Social Identity Theory of Leadership

    Open Access•Michael A Hogg•Personality and Social Psychology…•2001

  • Open Democracy

    Hélène Landemore•Open Democracy•2020

  • Knowing what to think by knowing who you are

    Open Access•Dominic Abrams, Margaret Wetherell et al.•British Journal of Social…•1990

  • Hearing the Other Side

    Open Access•Diana C Mutz•Hearing the Other Side•2006

  • The Common Ingroup Identity Model

    Samuel L Gaertner, John F Dovidio et al.•European Review of Social…•1993

  • Unintentional Gerrymandering

    Jowei Chen, Judith Rodden•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2013

  • There is an ‘I’ in truth

    Open Access•Chris Wang, Michael J Platow et al.•European Journal of Social…•2023

  • Twelve Key Findings in Deliberative Democracy Research

    Open Access•Nicole Curato, John S Dryzek et al.•Daedalus•2017

  • Social Corroboration and Opinion Extremity

    Open Access•Robert S Baron, Sieg I Hoppe et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•1996

  • Risky and cautious shifts in group decisions

    Open Access•James A F Stoner•Journal of Experimental Social…•1968

  • Voter Migration and the Geographic Sorting of the American Electorate

    Wendy K Tam Cho, James G Gimpel et al.•Annals of the Association of…•2013

  • Newspaper Coverage of Political Scandals

    Riccardo Puglisi, Jane Mcintosh Snyder•The Journal of Politics•2011

  • Does Media Coverage of Partisan Polarization Affect Political Attitudes

    Matthew Levendusky, N Malhotra•Political Communication•2016

  • Discussion-Induced Attitude Polarization

    Open Access•David G Myers•Human Relations•1975

  • Deindividuation Effects on Group Polarization in Computer-Mediated Communication

    Open Access•E J Lee, Eun-Ju Lee•Journal of Communication•2006

  • The enfranchisement lottery

    Open Access•Claudio López-Guerra, Claudio López‐guerra•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2011

  • Are knowledgeable voters better voters

    Open Access•Matthew Hannon•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2022

  • What are the chances you’re right about everything? An epistemic challenge for modern partisanship

    Open Access•Hrishikesh Joshi•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2020

  • Election Night’s Alright for Fighting

    Nicholas A Valentino, Ted Brader et al.•The Journal of Politics•2011

  • The Parties in Our Heads

    Douglas J Ahler, Gaurav Sood•The Journal of Politics•2018

  • (Mis)estimating Affective Polarization

    James N Druckman, Samara Klar et al.•The Journal of Politics•2022

  • The Home as a Political Fortress

    Sharad Iyengar, Shanto Iyengar et al.•The Journal of Politics•2018

  • Political Homophily in Social Relationships

    Gregory A Huber, N Malhotra•The Journal of Politics•2017

  • Polarization in the American Public

    Morris P Fiorina, Samuel A Abram et al.•The Journal of Politics•2008

  • The Workplace as a Context for Cross-Cutting Political Discourse

    Diana C Mutz, Jeffery J Mondak•The Journal of Politics•2006

  • Self-Fulfilling Misperceptions of Public Polarization

    Douglas J Ahler•The Journal of Politics•2014

  • Is Polarization a Myth

    Alan I Abramowitz, Kyle L Saunders•The Journal of Politics•2008

  • Intergroup contact reduces affective polarization but not among strong party identifiers

    Open Access•Jens Peter Frølund Thomsen, Anna Håland Thomsen•Scandinavian Political Studies•2023

  • Ideologues without Issues

    Open Access•L Mason•Public Opinion Quarterly•2018

  • Does Deliberation Breed an Appetite for Discursive Participation? Assessing the Impact of First-Hand Experience

    Open Access•Henrik Serup Christensen, Staffan Himmelroo et al.•Political Studies•2017

  • Emotional Rescue

    Open Access•Eric Groenendyk, Eric W Groenendyk et al.•Political Psychology•2014

  • One Tribe to Bind Them All

    Open Access•L Mason, Julie Wronski•Political Psychology•2018

  • The Strengthening of Partisan Affect

    Open Access•Sharad Iyengar, Shanto Iyengar et al.•Political Psychology•2018

  • Political Consequences of Partisan Prejudice

    Open Access•Richard M Shafranek•Political Psychology•2020

  • Unreflective Partisans? Policy Information and Evaluation in the Development of Partisanship

    Open Access•Ted Brader, Joshua A Tucker•Political Psychology•2018

  • Can Interparty Contact Reduce Affective Polarization? A Systematic Test of Different Forms of Intergroup Contact

    Magdalena Wojcieszak, Benjamin R Warner•Political Communication•2020

  • How the Politicization of Everyday Activities Affects the Public Sphere

    Amber Hye-Yon Lee•Political Communication•2021

  • Partisanship as a Social Identity

    Open Access•Emily A West, Sharad Iyengar et al.•Political Behavior•2022

  • Motivated Reasoning and Yard-Sign-Stealing Partisans

    Open Access•Ryan L Claassen, Michael J Ensley•Political Behavior•2016

  • When Corrections Fail

    Open Access•Brendan Nyhan, Jason Reifler•Political Behavior•2010

  • The Correlates of Discord

    Open Access•Lori D Bougher•Political Behavior•2017

  • Affective Polarization and Misinformation Belief

    Open Access•Libby Jenke•Political Behavior•2024

  • The Politics of Beauty

    Open Access•Stephen P Nicholson, Chelsea M Coe et al.•Political Behavior•2016

  • Partisan Differences in Nonpartisan Activity

    Open Access•Michele F Margolis, Michael W Sances•Political Behavior•2017

  • The Dating Preferences of Liberals and Conservatives

    Open Access•Casey A Klofstad, Casey Klofstad et al.•Political Behavior•2013

  • Against Elections

    Open Access•Alexander A Guerrero, Alexander Guerrero•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2014

  • The tie that divides

    Open Access•Sean J Westwood, Sean Westwood et al.•European Journal of Political…•2018

  • Reflections onHearing the Other Side, in Theory and in Practice

    Diana C Mutz•Critical Review•2013

  • Democracy without shortcuts

    Open Access•Cristina Lafont•Constellations•2019

  • Fear and Loathing across Party Lines

    Open Access•Sharad Iyengar, Shanto Iyengar et al.•American Journal of Political…•2015

  • How Getting the Facts Right Can Fuel Partisan‐Motivated Reasoning

    Open Access•Martin Bisgaard•American Journal of Political…•2019

  • Party Polarization and "Conflict Extension" in the American Electorate

    Geoffrey C Layman, Thomas M Carsey•American Journal of Political…•2002

  • The Economic Consequences of Partisanship in a Polarized Era

    Open Access•Christopher Mcconnell, Yotam Margalit et al.•American Journal of Political…•2018

  • Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs

    Open Access•Charles S Taber, Milton Lodge•American Journal of Political…•2006

  • The Nature of Affective Polarization

    Open Access•Nicholas C Dias, Nicholas Dias et al.•American Journal of Political…•2022

  • The group as a polarizer of attitudes

    Serge Moscovici, Marisa Zavalloni•Journal of Personality and Social…•1969

  • Party Over Policy

    Geoffrey L Cohen•Journal of Personality and Social…•2003

  • The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States

    Sharad Iyengar, Yphtach Lelkes et al.•Annual Review of Political Science•2018

  • Bowling Alone

    Open Access•Robert D Putnam•Journal of democracy•1995

  • The Secret Lives of Liberals and Conservatives

    Open Access•Dana R Carney, John T Jost et al.•Political Psychology•2008

  • I Disrespectfully Agree

    Open Access•L Mason•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • Political Polarization in the American Public

    Morris P Fiorina, Samuel J Abram et al.•Annual Review of Political Science•2008

  • Affect, Not Ideology

    Sharad Iyengar, Shanto Iyengar et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2012

  • A Polarized Environment

    Open Access•Daniel J Coffey, Patricia Hallam Joseph•American Behavioral Scientist•2013

  • Affective polarization in multiparty systems

    Open Access•Markus Wagner•Electoral Studies•2021

  • Facts and Myths about Misperceptions

    Open Access•Brendan Nyhan•The Journal of Economic…•2020

  • Solace for the Frustrations of Silent Citizenship

    Jeffrey Edward Green•Citizenship Studies•2015

  • Deepening the rift

    Open Access•Danielle Martins, Alessandro Nai•Electoral Studies•2024

  • The measurement of partisan sorting for 180 million voters

    Open Access•Joshua R Brown, Ryan D Enos•Nature Human Behaviour•2021

  • Interventions reducing affective polarization do not necessarily improve anti-democratic attitudes

    Open Access•Jan Gerrit Voelkel, James Chu et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2022

  • Who Wants To Deliberate-And Why

    Open Access•Michael A Neblo, Kevin M Esterling et al.•American Political Science Review•2010

Unique citing works5
Citations per year5
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOILibgen
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae