Online Focus Group Discussions to Engage Stigmatized Populations in Qualitative Health Research

Community participation in research involving stigmatized populations has been sub-optimal, and digital tools could potentially increase participation in qualitative research. This study aims to describe the implementation of an online chat-based FGD (Focus Group Discussion) with men who have sex with men (MSM) in China as part of formative research for the PIONEER project, determine the advantages and limitations associated with the approach, and assess the feasibility of deepening community participation in STI research. Participants were involved in four days of asynchronous FGDs on sexually transmitted diseases and answered questions about the online FGD method. Online FGDs allowed us to deepen participant engagement through bidirectional communication channels. Data from online FGDs directly informed recruitment strategies and community participation for a clinical trial. Overall, 63% (29/46) of men who had never participated in offline LGBTQ + activities joined online FGDs. Many participants (89%, 41/46) noted that online FGDs were more convenient, less socially awkward, and more anonymous than in-person qualitative research. We highlighted potential risks as well as mitigation strategies when using online FGDs. Online FGDs were feasible among this group of sexual minorities and may be particularly useful in many cities where stigma limits in-person research participation

Family medicine · Focus group · Formative assessment · Medical education · Men who have sex with men · Online community · Online discussion · Online research methods · Pedagogy · Political science · Qualitative research · Sociology · Stigma (botany · Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods · Medicine · Mobile Health and mHealth Applications · Participatory Visual Research Methods · Psychology

• Engaging in a dialogue with the Luton Roma community on access to healthcare services and co-producing solutions

  Open Access•Nasreen Ali, Britzer Paul Vincent et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2026

  Incluir item

• Emergent Design and Unanticipated Ideas in Asynchronous Online Focus Groups

  Open Access•Emily A Buddle, Rachel A Ankeny et al.•International Journal of…•2024

  Incluir item

• Let’s (not) Go Outside

  Open Access•Sam Mile, Sam Miles•The Life and Afterlife of Gay…•2021

  Incluir item

• Framework, principles and recommendations for utilising participatory methodologies in the co-creation and evaluation of public health interventions

  Open Access•Calum F Leask, Marlene Sandlund et al.•Research Involvement and Engagement•2019

  Incluir item

• Research co-design in health

  Open Access•Patrick Slattery, Alexander Saeri et al.•Health Research Policy and Systems•2020

  Incluir item

• Qualitative methods in implementation research

  Open Access•Alison B Hamilton, Alison Brown et al.•Psychiatry Research•2019

  Incluir item

• Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research

  Open Access•Nicola Gale, Nicola K Gale et al.•BMC Medical Research Methodology•2013

  Incluir item

• Non-disclosure of Sexual Orientation to Parents Associated with Sexual Risk Behaviors Among Gay and Bisexual MSM in China

  Open Access•Ye Zhao, Ying Ma et al.•AIDS and Behavior•2015

  Incluir item

• In-Person Versus Online Focus Group Discussions

  Open Access•Cory R Woodyatt, Cory Woodyatt et al.•Qualitative Health Research•2016

  Incluir item

• WeChat and civil society in China

  Open Access•Fangjing Tu•Communication and the Public•2016

  Incluir item

• Mosaics, Triangles, and DNA

  Open Access•Pat Bazeley, Lynn Kemp•Journal of Mixed Methods Research•2011

  Incluir item

• Using WhatsApp for focus group discussions

  Open Access•A Colom•Qualitative Research•2021

  Incluir item

• Data Richness Trade-Offs Between Face-to-Face, Online Audiovisual, and Online Text-Only Focus Groups

  Open Access•Katie M Abrams, Zongyuan Wang et al.•Social Science Computer Review•2014

  Incluir item

• Assessment of Stigma Towards Homosexuality in China

  Open Access•Torsten B Neilands, Wayne T Steward et al.•Archives of Sexual Behavior•2008

  Incluir item

• Using WhatsApp Focus Group Discussions for Qualitative Data Collection

  Open Access•Pearlyn Neo, Jane Mingjie Lim et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  Incluir item

• Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance

  Open Access•Archon Fung•Public Administration Review•2006

  Incluir item

• Texting the waters

  Open Access•Julienne Chen, Pearlyn Neo•Methodological Innovations•2019

  Incluir item

• WhatsApp usage patterns and prediction of demographic characteristics without access to message content

  Open Access•Avi Rosenfeld, Sigal Sina et al.•Demographic Research•2018

  Incluir item

• The Social Contexts of Focus Groups

  Open Access•Jocelyn A Hollander•Journal of Contemporary Ethnography•2004

  Incluir item