Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Ifs and Oughts

Bibliographic Data

ID8074191
AuthorsNiko Kolodny (0000-0003-0812-6989, corresponding author), John Macfarlane (0000-0003-2557-9090), Inc Journal of Philosophy
Year2010
Volume107
Issue3
Pages115-143
Publication date2010-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Journal of Philosophy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-362X • E-ISSN: 1939-8549
PublisherPhilosophy Documentation Center (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.5840/jphil2010107310
OpenAlexW37388086
LanguageEN
Citations received87

Computer Science · Free Will and Agency · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy and Theoretical Science

  • Ecological Rationality Without Externalism

    Open Access•David Thorstad•Philosophy of Science•2026

  • Assessment Sensitivity Relative Truth And Its Applications

    John Macfarlane•Assessment Sensitivity Relative…•2014

  • Nonfactualism about Epistemic Modality

    Seth Yalcin•Epistemic Modality•2011

  • Projecting Possibilities in the Nominal Domain

    Luis Alonso-Ovalle, Luis Alonso‐ovalle et al.•Journal of Semantics•2018

  • Conjunctive strengthening more broadly

    Open Access•Luka Crnič•Journal of Semantics•2025

  • Ought-Implies-Can in Context

    Open Access•Darren Bradley•Ergo an Open Access Journal of…•2024

  • Akrasia and Epistemic Impurism

    Open Access•James Fritz•Journal of the American…•2021

  • Inability, Perspective, and the Deliberative Ought

    Open Access•Michael Vollmer•Ethical Theory and Moral Practice•2026

  • Questions Should Have Answers

    Open Access•Michael Deigan•European Journal of Philosophy•2026

  • Context Sensitivity and Chance

    Open Access•Quinn Harr•Pacific philosophical quarterly•2020

  • Modeling Descriptive and Deontic Cognition as Two Modes of Relation Between Mind and World

    Open Access•Preston Stovall•Pacific philosophical quarterly•2022

  • Vagueness, Conditionals and Context Sensitivity

    Open Access•Tom Beevers•Pacific philosophical quarterly•2024

  • How generics obscure the logic of conditionals

    Open Access•Dragana Lassiter, Maxime Bourlier et al.•Mind & Language•2026

  • Attitudes, conditional and general

    Open Access•Daniel Drucker•Linguistics and Philosophy•2025

  • The Liar Without Relativism

    Open Access•Poppy Mankowitz•Erkenntnis•2023

  • Epistemic Modals in Hypothetical Reasoning

    Open Access•Julian J Schlöder, Maria Aloni et al.•Erkenntnis•2023

  • Risk, Recklessness, and Objectivism

    Open Access•Daniele Bruno•Ratio•2026

  • Evaluating the multiple proposition strategy

    Open Access•Benjamin Lennertz•Ratio•2020

  • Against the newer evidentialists

    Open Access•David Thorstad•Philosophical Studies•2023

  • The many ‘oughts’ of deliberation

    Open Access•John Pittard•Philosophical Studies•2023

  • The way things go

    Open Access•Eduardo Pérez-Navarro•Philosophical Studies•2022

  • Supererogation and conditional obligation

    Open Access•Daniel Domínguez Muñoz, Theron Pummer•Philosophical Studies•2022

  • Rational monism and rational pluralism

    Open Access•Jack Spencer•Philosophical Studies•2021

  • What the doctor should do

    Open Access•Davide Fassio•Philosophical Studies•2022

  • Reasons, rationality, and opaque sweetening

    Open Access•Ryan Doody•Noûs•2025

  • Dilating and contracting arbitrarily

    Open Access•David Builes, Sophie Horowitz et al.•Noûs•2022

  • Metalinguistic negotiations in moral disagreement

    Renée Jorgensen Bolinger•Inquiry•2022

  • What determines meaning at a context of utterance

    Open Access•J L Dowell•Inquiry•2025

  • Perspectivism, Accessibility and the Failure of Conjunction Agglomeration

    Davide Fassio•Ethics•2021

  • Assumptions, Hypotheses, and Antecedents

    Open Access•Vladan Djordjevic•dialectica•2020

  • A Proof‐Theoretic Account of the Miners Paradox

    Open Access•Ansten Klev•Theoria•2016

  • Indicative Conditionals in Objective Contexts

    Open Access•Vít Punčochář, Christopher Gauker•Theoria•2020

  • Epistemic contextualism defended

    Open Access•Roseanne Mckenna•Synthese•2015

  • Anankastic conditionals are just conditionals

    Open Access•Cleo Condoravdi, Sven Lauer•Semantics and Pragmatics•2016

  • On the semantics and pragmatics of epistemic vocabulary

    Open Access•Sarah Mo, Sarah Moss•Semantics and Pragmatics•2015

  • Intervention in deontic reasoning

    Open Access•Willard Chung, Woojin Chung•Semantics and Pragmatics•2020

  • Modals with a taste of the deontic

    Open Access•Joshua Knobe, Zoltan Szabo et al.•Semantics and Pragmatics•2013

  • Revisiting the Argument from Action Guidance

    Open Access•Philip G Fox, Philip Fox•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2019

  • Objectivism and Prospectivism About Rightness

    Open Access•Elinor Mason•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2013

  • "Ought" and the Perspective of the Agent

    Open Access•Benjamin Kiesewetter•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2011

  • Rationality, Appearances, and Apparent Facts

    Open Access•Javier González De Prado Salas•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2018

  • Ethics and the Question of What to Do

    Open Access•Olle Risberg•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2023

  • Not Enough There There Evidence, Reasons, and Language Independence

    Open Access•Michael G Titelbaum•Philosophical Perspectives•2010

  • The Revenge of the Semantics‐pragmatics Distinction

    Open Access•Josh Dever•Philosophical Perspectives•2013

  • Quantifiers for a Modal Future

    Open Access•Malte Willer•Philosophical Perspectives•2025

  • Talking About Worlds

    Open Access•Matthew Mandelkern•Philosophical Perspectives•2018

  • Risky business

    Open Access•Alan Hajek•Philosophical Perspectives•2021

  • Naturalizing Deontic Logic

    Open Access•Melissa Fusco•Philosophical Perspectives•2018

  • What we know and what to do

    Open Access•Nate Charlow•Synthese•2013

  • Praise, objective rightness and extended action

    Open Access•Vishnu Sridharan•Synthese•2023

  • New foundations for imperative logic III

    Open Access•Peter B M Vranas•Synthese•2016

  • Do we really need a knowledge-based decision theory

    Open Access•Davide Fassio, Jie Gao•Synthese•2021

  • Ought” and intensionality

    Open Access•Junhyo Lee•Synthese•2021

  • Anti-exceptionalism and methodological pluralism in logic

    Open Access•Diego Tajer•Synthese•2022

  • Ought-contextualism and reasoning

    Open Access•Darren Bradley•Synthese•2021

  • Modality, expected utility, and hypothesis testing

    Open Access•Willard Chung, Salvador Mascarenhas•Synthese•2023

  • Semantic relativism and ways of knowing

    Open Access•Leonid Tarasov•Synthese•2019

  • Narrow-scoping for wide-scopers

    Open Access•Alex Worsnip•Synthese•2015

  • Retractions

    Open Access•Teresa Marques•Synthese•2018

  • Against the truth norm

    Open Access•James Revell Carr•Philosophical Studies•2025

  • Ought , Agents, and Actions

    Mark Schroeder•The Philosophical Review•2011

  • Probabilistic Knowledge

    Melissa Fusco•The Philosophical Review•2020

  • A zetetic approach to perspectivism

    Open Access•Inken Titz•The Philosophical Quarterly•2025

  • Outline of a Theory of Reasons

    Open Access•Vincenzo Crupi, Andrea Iacona•The Philosophical Quarterly•2022

  • Knowledge of Objective ‘Oughts’

    Open Access•Daniel Domínguez Muñoz, Jack Spencer•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2020

  • Thinking and being sure

    Open Access•Jeremy Goodman, Ben Holguín•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2022

  • Hard and Blind

    Open Access•Sorin Bangu•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2019

  • Might Moral Epistemologists Be Asking The Wrong Questions

    Open Access•Caleb Perl•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2018

  • Closure and Epistemic Modals

    Open Access•Justin Bledin, Tamar Lando•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2017

  • One's Modus Ponens

    Open Access•Una Stojnić•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2016

  • Policy Externalism

    Open Access•Daniel Drucker•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2017

  • Inheritance

    Open Access•Kyle Blumberg, John Hawthorne•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2021

  • Inquiry beyond knowledge

    Open Access•Bob Beddor•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2023

  • Dispossessing Defeat

    Open Access•Javier González De Prado Salas•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2019

  • Trivializing Informational Consequence

    Open Access•Paolo Santorio•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2021

  • Credences for strict conditionals

    Open Access•Malte Willer•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2024

  • Conditional Heresies

    Open Access•Fabrizio Cariani, Simon Goldstein•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2018

  • Normative Reasons Contextualism

    Open Access•Tim Henning•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2012

  • Friends with the Good

    Open Access•Eduardo Pérez-Navarro•The Philosophical Quarterly•2023

  • Updating, Undermining, and Independence

    Jonathan Weisberg•The British Journal for the…•2015

  • What is a reason to act

    Open Access•Kieran Setiya•Philosophical Studies•2012

  • Ought’-contextualism beyond the parochial

    Open Access•Alex Worsnip•Philosophical Studies•2018

  • Three Ways in Which Logic Might Be Normative

    Florian Steinberger, Journal Of Philosophy Inc•The Journal of Philosophy•2019

  • Contextualismo e relativismo na ética

    Open Access•Wilson Mendonça•Trans/Form/Ação•2023

  • Probability Operators

    Open Access•Seth Yalcin•Philosophy Compass•2010

  • Free choice is a form of dependence

    Open Access•Magdalena Kaufmann•Natural Language Semantics•2016

  • The Meaning of Imperatives

    Open Access•Nate Charlow•Philosophy Compass•2014

Unique citing works87
Citations per year5,44
Citation span2010 - 2026 (17)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 86

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae