Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores

Bibliographic Data

ID8222129
AuthorsWilliam W Rozeboom (corresponding author), Allan Birnbaum
Year1969
Volume6
Issue1
Pages112
Publication date1969-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeREVIEW
Review ofStatistical Theories of Mental Test Scores, Frederic M Lord, 2008
VenueAmerican Educational Research Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-8312 • E-ISSN: 1935-1011
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2307/1162101
OpenAlexW2084398551
LanguageEN
Citations received1

This is a reprint of the orginal book released in 1968. Our primary goal in this book is to sharpen the skill, sophistication, and in- tuition of the reader in the interpretation of mental test data, and in the construction and use of mental tests both as instruments of psychological theory and as tools in the practical problems of selection, evaluation, and guidance. We seek to do this by exposing the reader to some psychologically meaningful statistical theories of mental test scores. Although this book is organized in terms of test-score theories and models, the practical applications and limitations of each model studied receive substantial emphasis, and these discussions are presented in as nontechnical a manner as we have found possible. Since this book catalogues a host of test theory models and formulas, it may serve as a reference handbook. Also, for a limited group of specialists, this book aims to provide a more rigorous foundation for further theoretical research than has heretofore been available.One aim of this book is to present statements of the assumptions, together with derivations of the implications, of a selected group of statistical models that the authors believe to be useful as guides in the practices of test construction and utilization. With few exceptions we have given a complete proof for each major result presented in the book. In many cases these proofs are simpler, more complete, and more illuminating than those originally offered. When we have omitted proofs or parts of proofs, we have generally provided a reference containing the omitted argument. We have left some proofs as exercises for the reader, but only when the general method of proof has already been demonstrated. At times we have proved only special cases of more generally stated theorems, when the general proof affords no additional insight into the problem and yet is substantially more complex mathematically

Econometrics · Mathematics education · Psychometrics · Statistical analysis · Statistical hypothesis testing · Statistics · Test (biology · Test validity · Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques · Clinical Psychology · Mathematics · Psychological Testing and Assessment · Psychology

  • Variation Between Couples of Human Coital Rates

    Open Access•W H James•Journal of Biosocial Science•1981

  • Desenvolvimento e aplicação de modelo multidimensional para a avaliação da qualidade educacional no programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu do Ipen

    Open Access•Claudio Mioranza•2009

  • A Computerized Adaptive Approach to Measuring Faculty Assessment Literacy

    Open Access•Beyza Aksu Dünya, Stefanie A Wind et al.•SAGE Open•2025

  • Effects of Innovative and Traditional Teaching Methods on Technical College Students' Achievement in Computer Craft Practices

    Open Access•Abei Zhang, Chijioke Jonathan Olelewe et al.•SAGE Open•2020

  • Modeling Skipped Items in Cognitive Diagnostic Assessments

    Open Access•Lidan Liang, Jing Lü et al.•SAGE Open•2024

  • Operationalism and realism in psychometrics

    Open Access•Elina Vessonen•Philosophy Compass•2019

  • Development of cross-language lexical influence

    Anne White, Barbara C Malt et al.•International Journal of…•2020

  • Development of cross-language lexical influence

    Gert Storms, Eef Ameel et al.•International Journal of…•2015

  • Organizational Consequences of Implementing an ISO 14001 Environmental Management System

    Open Access•María Concepción López Fernández, Maria Concepción López-Fernández et al.•Organization & Environment•2007

  • A principled design framework for college admissions tests

    Howard T Everson•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2000

  • Seeing the forest from the trees

    David Lubinski, Lloyd G Humphreys•Psychology Public Policy and Law•1996

  • Kelley’s Paradox and strength skewness in research on unconscious mental processes

    Open Access•Daryl Y H Lee, Christopher J Berry et al.•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2025

  • Modeling dependent group judgments

    Open Access•Maren Mayer, Daniel W Heck•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2025

  • Reliability and Validity of Student Evaluations

    Open Access•Hugh Hinton•PS Political Science & Politics•1993

  • Item Response Models, Pathological Science and the Shape of Error

    Open Access•Joel Michell•Theory & Psychology•2004

  • The cat came back

    Open Access•Keith A Markus, Denny Borsboom•Theory & Psychology•2012

  • Measurement in psychology

    Open Access•Günter Trendler•Theory & Psychology•2013

  • Conjoint Measurement and the Rasch Paradox

    Open Access•Joel Michell•Theory & Psychology•2008

  • “The constantly recurring argument”

    Open Access•Joel Michell•Theory & Psychology•2012

  • Thorndike’s Credo

    Open Access•Joel Michell•Theory & Psychology•2020

  • Why Psychometrics is Not Pathological

    Open Access•Denny Borsboom, Gideon J Mellenbergh•Theory & Psychology•2004

  • The ambiguous utility of psychometrics for the interpretative foundation of socially relevant avatars

    Open Access•Stéphane Vautier, Michiel Veldhuis et al.•Theory & Psychology•2012

  • Normal Science, Pathological Science and Psychometrics

    Open Access•Joel Michell•Theory & Psychology•2000

  • Why is one study technique superior to another

    Open Access•David Trafimow•Theory & Psychology•2023

  • The Rasch paradox, conjoint measurement, and psychometrics

    Open Access•Joel Michell•Theory & Psychology•2014

  • Descriptive theories of behaviour may allow for the scientific measurement of psychological attributes

    Open Access•Andrew Kyngdon•Theory & Psychology•2013

  • A middle path between abandoning measurement and measurement theory

    Open Access•Stephen Humphry, Stephen M Humphry•Theory & Psychology•2013

  • Modifying Measures Based on Differential Item Functioning (DIF) Impact Analyses

    Open Access•Jeanne A Teresi, Mildred Ramirez et al.•Journal of Aging and Health•2012

  • Gender Effects in Actuarial Risk Assessment

    Guy Giguère, Tamsin Higgs et al.•Women & Criminal Justice•2025

  • Measurement and sampling noise undermine inferences about awareness in location probability learning

    Open Access•Alicia Franco-Martínez, Francisco Vicente-Conesa et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2025

  • A Quantitative Analysis ofAtaque de Nerviosin Puerto Rico

    Open Access•Vivian E Febo San Miguel, P J Guarnaccia et al.•Hispanic Journal of Behavioral…•2006

  • The Validity of Occupational Data for Immigrants

    Open Access•Robert M O''Brien, Robert M O’brien et al.•Sociological Perspectives•1985

  • Aggregation in Data Tables

    Open Access•Lawrence J Hubert, Thomas Kenney et al.•Environment and Planning A…•1981

  • Age-relation, reliability and grammatical validity of measures of utterance length

    Open Access•Jean A Rondal, Martine Ghiotto et al.•Journal of Child Language•1987

  • A comprehensive review of Rasch measurement in language assessment

    Open Access•Vahid Aryadoust, Li Ying Ng et al.•Language Testing•2021

  • Cognitive interference and a food-related memory bias in binge eating disorder

    Open Access•Jennifer Svaldi, Florian Schmitz et al.•Appetite•2014

  • The validity of international surveys of reading literacy

    Open Access•Timo M Bechger, Timo Bechger et al.•Studies In Educational Evaluation•1998

  • Psychometric aspects of pupil monitoring systems

    Open Access•Cees A W Glas, Hanneke Geerlings•Studies In Educational Evaluation•2009

  • Differential item functioning (DIF) analysis of computation, word problem and geometry questions across gender and SES groups

    Open Access•Giray Berberoğlu•Studies In Educational Evaluation•1995

  • Teaching skills of student teachers

    Open Access•Wim van De Grift, Michelle Helms‐lorenz et al.•Studies In Educational Evaluation•2014

  • Can students’ attitudes towards mathematics and science be compared across countries? Evidence from measurement invariance modeling in TIMSS 2019

    Open Access•Katherine J Reynolds, Katherine Reynolds et al.•Studies In Educational Evaluation•2022

  • Contributions of the rasch model to objectivity in measurement

    Open Access•Durmus Ali Özçelik, Giray Berberoğlu•Studies In Educational Evaluation•1991

  • Criterion-referenced tests — Theory and application

    Open Access•Reiner Fricke, Reinhold Lühmann•Studies In Educational Evaluation•1983

  • Exploitative vs. appreciative use of nature – Two interpretations of utilization and their relevance for environmental education

    Alexandra Kibbe, F X Bogner et al.•Studies In Educational Evaluation•2014

  • Re-evaluation of the D21-digital-index assessment instrument for measuring higher-level digital competences

    Open Access•Stephen Wild, Lydia Schulze Heuling•Studies In Educational Evaluation•2021

  • A probe into EFL learners’ emotioncy as a source of test bias

    Open Access•Maliheh Karami, Reza Pishghadam et al.•Studies In Educational Evaluation•2019

  • Diagnostic assessment in TIMSS-R

    Open Access•Menucha Birenbaum, Curtis Tatsuoka et al.•Studies In Educational Evaluation•2004

  • Hierarchical linear modelling of predictive validity

    Open Access•Lucas Othuon, Nand Kishor•Studies In Educational Evaluation•1994

  • Methods of assessing personality for epidemiological study

    J E Gallacher, J E J Gallacher•Journal of Epidemiology and…•1992

  • An application of item response theory to psychological test development

    Open Access•Cristian Zanon, Claudio S Hutz et al.•Psicologia Reflexão e Crítica•2016

  • Validation of a German version of the Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer (CQOLC) in a sample of significant others of breast and gynaecologic cancer patients

    Open Access•Anna Tamara Ehmann, Cornelia Mahler et al.•Psicologia Reflexão e Crítica•2020

  • Objective and Subjective Knowledge Relationships

    Jay P Carlson, Leslie H Vincent et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•2009

  • Relaxing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer Research Using a Hierarchical IRT Model

    Martijn G De Jong, Jan-Benedict E M Steenkamp et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•2007

  • NEO-FFI scores in college men and women

    Open Access•Gilbert Becker•Journal of Research in Personality•2006

  • A direct comparison of the temporal stability and criterion validities of experiential and retrospective global measures of subjective well-being

    Open Access•Nathan W Hudson, Richard E Lucas et al.•Journal of Research in Personality•2022

  • Multivariable-multimethod analysis of the dimensions of interpersonal behavior

    Open Access•Dan Mungas, Dan M Mungas et al.•Journal of Research in Personality•1981

  • The validity of formal and informal personality assessments

    Open Access•Sampo V Paunonen, Douglas N Jackson•Journal of Research in Personality•1985

  • Assessing parental childrearing behaviors

    Open Access•J Conrad Schwarz, Jack Mearns•Journal of Research in Personality•1989

  • Optimizing the validity of personality assessments

    Open Access•Sampo V Paunonen•Journal of Research in Personality•1984

  • The Investigation of Personality Structure

    Open Access•John F Finch, Stephen G West•Journal of Research in Personality•1997

  • The reliability of aggregated measurements

    Open Access•Sampo V Paunonen•Journal of Research in Personality•1984

  • The integrated trait–state model

    Open Access•Ellen L Hamaker, John R Nesselroade et al.•Journal of Research in Personality•2007

  • One step further in mistreatment research

    Open Access•João L Bastos, Fabiula Renilda Bernardo et al.•Journal of Community Psychology•2025

  • Measurement invariance in the social sciences

    Open Access•Heinz Leitgöb, Daniel Seddig et al.•Social Science Research•2023

  • Individual differences make a difference

    Open Access•Mario Gollwitzer, Oliver Christ et al.•European Journal of Social…•2014

  • Psychometric detection of schizotypy

    William M Grove•Psychological Bulletin•1982

  • Model selection in covariance structures analysis and the "problem" of sample size

    Robert Cudeck, Susan J Henly•Psychological Bulletin•1991

  • Multimethod factor analysis in the evaluation of convergent and discriminant validity

    Douglas N Jackson•Psychological Bulletin•1969

  • Analysis of multiplicative combination rules when the causal variables are measured with error

    Jerome R Busemeyer, Lawrence E Jones•Psychological Bulletin•1983

  • "Comment on Bartko's "On various intraclass correlation reliability coefficients

    James Algina•Psychological Bulletin•1978

  • Using the longitudinal Guttman simplex as a basis for measuring growth

    Linda M Collins, Norman Cliff•Psychological Bulletin•1990

  • Equivalence of computerized and paper-and-pencil cognitive ability tests

    Alan D Mead, Fritz Drasgow•Psychological Bulletin•1993

  • Confirmatory factor analysis models of information processing stages

    Gary Donaldson•Psychological Bulletin•1983

  • Analysis of variance and the magnitude of effects

    James H Dwyer•Psychological Bulletin•1974

  • An introduction to the logic, assumptions, and basic analytic procedures of two-stage least squares

    Lawrence R James, B Krishna Singh et al.•Psychological Bulletin•1978

  • Reaction time in differential and developmental research

    Open Access•Christopher Draheim, Cody A Mashburn et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2019

  • The "stuff" of hypnotic performance

    Claude G Balthazard, Erik Woody et al.•Psychological Bulletin•1985

  • Individual differences in judging deception

    Charles F Bond, Bella M Depaulo•Psychological Bulletin•2008

  • Factoring items and factoring scales are different

    Ira H Bernstein, Gary Teng•Psychological Bulletin•1989

  • Methodological issues in meta-analyzing standard deviations

    Therese Pigott, Therese D Pigott et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2008

  • Nonrandom assignment and the analysis of covariance

    John E Overall, J Arthur Woodward•Psychological Bulletin•1977

  • Comparison of correlations, variances, covariances, and regression weights with or without measurement error

    Charles E Werts, Donald A Rock et al.•Psychological Bulletin•1976

  • Construct validity

    Susan E Whitely•Psychological Bulletin•1983

  • Measurement and statistics

    Scott E Maxwell, Harold D Delaney•Psychological Bulletin•1985

  • Platonic true scores

    Donald F Klein, T Anne Cleary•Psychological Bulletin•1969

  • Beyond tests of significance

    Graham M Vaughan, Michael C Corballis•Psychological Bulletin•1969

  • Biases resulting from the use of indexes

    Jeffrey M Perloff, Jacqueline B Persons•Psychological Bulletin•1988

  • Artifactual and genuine relationships of lateral difference scores to overall accuracy in studies of laterality

    Loren J Chapman, Jean P Chapman•Psychological Bulletin•1988

  • Development and Monte Carlo evaluation of meta-analytic estimators for correlated data

    Lawrence Roth, Lawrence H Roth et al.•Psychological Bulletin•1991

  • Data analysis using item response theory

    David Thissen, Lynne Steinberg•Psychological Bulletin•1988

  • An approach to the psychology of instruction

    R C Atkinson, James A Paulson•Psychological Bulletin•1972

  • The relation of economic status to subjective well-being in developing countries

    Ryan T Howell, Colleen J Howell et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2008

  • Use of the nonequivalent control group design when subjects are growing

    Anthony S Bryk, Herbert I Weisberg•Psychological Bulletin•1977

  • Path analysis

    Charles E Werts, Robert L Linn•Psychological Bulletin•1970

  • On the relationship of reliability to statistical power

    J P Sutcliffe•Psychological Bulletin•1980

  • The continuing misinterpretation of the standard error of measurement

    Frank J Dudek•Psychological Bulletin•1979

  • Optimal allocation of assessment time in randomized pretest-posttest designs

    Scott E Maxwell•Psychological Bulletin•1994

  • A statistical lower bound to population reliability

    J Arthur Woodward, Peter M Bentler•Psychological Bulletin•1978

  • A perspective on developments in assessing psychopathology

    Edward Helmes, John R Reddon•Psychological Bulletin•1993

  • Beyond group-mean differences

    David Thissen, Lynne Steinberg et al.•Psychological Bulletin•1986

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae