Evaluating the efficiency of different recording protocols for entheseal changes in regards to expressing activity patterns using archival data and cross‐sectional geometric properties

Bibliographic Data

ID8311533
AuthorsEfrossyni Michopoulou (Department of Biology, Section of Animal and Human Physiology National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis Athens 15771), E Nikita (0000-0003-2094-5047, Fitch Laboratory British School at Athens Athens 10676, corresponding author), Efstratios D Valakos (Department of Biology, Section of Animal and Human Physiology National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis Athens 15771), Efstratios Valakos (0000-0002-8970-931X, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens)
Year2015
Volume158
Issue4
Pages557-568
Publication date2015-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-9483 • E-ISSN: 1096-8644
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/ajpa.22822
PMID26239396
OpenAlexW2145531410
LanguageEN
Citations received33
References cited74

OBJECTIVES: In the past decade there have been extensive discussions on the potential utility of entheseal changes (EC) as activity markers. Nevertheless, no study to date has compared different EC recording protocols with respect to their correlation to activity patterns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This article records changes on fibrocartilaginous entheses of the upper limbs of 90 male skeletons from the documented Athens Collection using the Hawkey and Merbs (Int J Osteoarchaeol 5 (1995) 324-338), Mariotti et al. (Collegium Antropol 28 (2004) 145-159), and Villotte et al. (Am J Phys Anthropol 142 (2010) 224-234) recording schemes in order to determine which one exhibits the highest correlation with activity. Activity is assessed by means of the recorded profession of each individual, as well as employing cross-sectional geometric properties. Generalized Linear Models are used to explore the impact of age, body mass, and activity on EC expression. RESULTS: Our results agree with previous studies that age is the primary factor determining EC, whereas body mass is the second most influential factor. In contrast, activity in the form of profession or cross-sectional geometry rarely showed a significant correlation to EC expression and no clear pattern could be discerned irrespective of the recording technique. However, bilateral differences in the impact of age and body mass in EC expression were traced and may relate to activity patterns. CONCLUSIONS: The differences found in the bilateral impact of age and body mass highlight the fact that the activity patterns of the individuals under examination must play an underlying role to EC expression, though current recording schemes for EC do not capture this, rendering further work in the direction of developing more elaborate recording standards imperative

Cross-sectional study · Geography · Statistics · Computer Science · Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies · Mathematics · Morphological variations and asymmetry · Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access