A Call to the Profession

Rejuvenating the Multicultural Conversation

Bibliographic Data

ID8913438
AuthorsCharles Ridley (0000-0003-2259-376X, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX, USA, corresponding author), Katie Console (Texas A & M University, College Station, TX, USA), Ankita Sahu (0009-0009-1799-974X, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX, USA), Caroliina Yin (Texas A & M University, College Station, TX, USA), Debra Mollen (0000-0002-4785-5984, Texas Woman’s University, TX, USA)
Year2021
Volume49
Issue4
Pages610-618
Publication date2021-04-12
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Counseling Psychologist (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0011-0000 • E-ISSN: 1552-3861
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0011000021991872
OpenAlexW3156142311
LanguageEN
References cited12

In this rejoinder, the authors respond to the feedback and suggestions offered by Vandiver et al. (2021). We clarify that the intent of our Major Contribution is to rejuvenate the conversation regarding multicultural counseling competence, continue the quest to operationalize the construct, and propose the process model of multicultural counseling competence. In response to our colleagues’ reaction article, we organized this rejoinder into three sections: major points of agreement, major points of disagreement, and mixed points of view, before concluding again with our intention and remembering the importance of continuing the work

Competence (human resources · Conversation · Cultural competence · Epistemology · Multiculturalism · Operationalization · Pedagogy · Counseling Practices and Supervision · Psychology · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOI