When do people learn likes and dislikes from co-occurrences? A dual-force perspective on evaluative conditioning
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9005801 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lea M Sperlich (0000-0001-5513-0230, University of Cologne, corresponding author), Christian Unkelbach (0000-0002-3793-6246, University of Cologne) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 103 |
| Pages | 104377-104377 |
| Publication date | 2022-07-12 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-1031 • E-ISSN: 1096-0465 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104377 |
| OpenAlex | W4285081807 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 99 |
Evaluative Conditioning (EC) research shows that people learn their likes and dislikes due to the co-occurrence of stimuli (CS and US) in the environment. Most recent EC research addressed processes underlying this phenomenon: how do people acquire their likes and dislikes? We address the question of when people learn from co-occurrences. To understand when learning occurs rather than how it occurs, we apply a dual-force perspective (Bless & Fiedler, 2006). We propose that the environment provides a bottom-up force, for example, via spatial and temporal closeness of CS and US. The organism provides a top-down force, for example, by active inferences or existing knowledge about CS and US. We propose that these forces jointly determine when people learn from co-occurrences. We tested this dual-force perspective by creating experimental conditions that should lead to EC effects from both associative and propositional EC process models but should prevent EC effects from a dual-force perspective. Across four pre-registered laboratory experiments (N = 568) and two pre-registered online experiments (N = 440), we found that changing the top-down force weakened and eliminated (Experiments 1–3) or reinstated EC effects (Experiment 4), using a backward (Experiments 1–4) or forward conditioning procedure (Experiment 5–6), while keeping the environmental bottom-up force constant (Experiment 6). Independent of the how question (e.g., associative or propositional), these results support the dual-force perspective as a framework to predict when people learn their likes and dislikes from the co-occurrence of CS and US in the environment
Associative learning · Closeness · Cognitive psychology · Conditioning · Dual (grammatical number · Epistemology · Perspective (graphical · Phenomenon · Statistics · Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Emotions and Moral Behavior · Mathematics · Memory and Neural Mechanisms · Psychology · Social Psychology
Bayesian Cognitive Modeling
Relation of cue to consequence in avoidance learning
On perceptual readiness.
The propositional nature of human associative learning
The Role of Inhibition in Avoiding Distraction by Salient Stimuli
Comparison processes in social judgment
On the generality of the laws of learning.
Event files
Nonnaïveté among Amazon Mechanical Turk workers
OpenSesame
Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis
Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing
Introducing the Open Affective Standardized Image Set (Oasis)
Classical conditioning of human ‘evaluative’ responses
G*Power 3
An event-coding account of attitudes
How to capitalize on a priori contrasts in linear (mixed) models
Data Collection via Online Platforms
The Role of Relational Qualifiers in Attribute Conditioning
Propositional Versus Dual-Process Accounts of Evaluative Conditioning
Resource Availability and Explicit Memory Largely Determine Evaluative Conditioning Effects in a Paradigm Claimed to be Conducive to Implicit Attitude Acquisition
The Symmetric Nature of Evaluative Memory Associations
Self-Generated Attitude Change
Implicit Attitude Formation Through Classical Conditioning
Reducing Automatically Activated Racial Prejudice Through Implicit Evaluative Conditioning
Social Comparison
A Conceptual and Theoretical Analysis of Evaluative Conditioning
Contrast effects in backward evaluative conditioning
Is evaluative conditioning really uncontrollable? A comparative test of three emotion-focused strategies to prevent the acquisition of conditioned preferences
Non-competitive liking for brands. No blocking in evaluative conditioning
Performing high‐powered studies efficiently with sequential analyses
Attitudes from mere co-occurrences are guided by differentiation
Beyond awareness and resources
Evaluative conditioning of high-novelty stimuli does not seem to be based on an automatic form of associative learning
Automatic vigilance
Priming Trait Inferences Through Pictures and Moving Pictures
Implicit misattribution as a mechanism underlying evaluative conditioning
I Like Myself but I Don't Know Why
On the respective contributions of awareness of unconditioned stimulus valence and unconditioned stimulus identity in attitude formation through evaluative conditioning
Evaluative conditioning in humans
Explanation, imagination, and confidence in judgment
Attitudes established by classical conditioning
Classical Conditioning of Consumer Attitudes
Evaluative Conditioning Procedures and the Resilience of Conditioned Brand Attitudes
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |