Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

He said, she said

Gender differences in the disclosure of positive and negative information

Bibliographic Data

ID9007971
AuthorsErin Carbone (0000-0002-1714-7661, Decision Sciences (United States), corresponding author), G Loewenstein (0000-0003-2790-0474, Carnegie Mellon University), Irene Scopelliti (0000-0001-6712-5332, City, University of London), Joachim Vosgerau (0000-0002-1185-8403, Bocconi University)
Year2023
Volume110
Pages104525-104525
Publication date2023-09-07
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Experimental Social Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-1031 • E-ISSN: 1096-0465
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104525
OpenAlexW4386516378
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited56

Research on gender differences in (self-)disclosure has produced mixed results, and, where differences have emerged, they may be an artifact of the measures employed. The present paper explores whether gender – defined as self-identified membership in one's sociocultural group – can indeed account for differences in the desire and propensity to divulge information to others. We additionally identify a possible moderator for such differences. In three studies employing two distinct research approaches – a free recall task for the extreme desire to disclose (Study 1, N = 195) and scaled responses to scenarios that manipulate valence experimentally in an exploratory study (Study 2, N = 547) and a preregistered replication (Study 3, N = 405) – we provide evidence of a robust interaction between gender and information valence. Male participants appear similar to female participants in their desire and likelihood to disclose positive information but are less likely than women to want to share negative information with others, and less likely to ultimately act on that desire. Men are reportedly more motivated than women to disclose as a means of self-enhancement, and self-reports reveal that women perceive their sharing behavior to be relatively normative, while men believe themselves to be more withholding than what is optimal. Information disclosure is increasingly pervasive and permanent in the digital age, and is accompanied by an array of social and psychological consequences. Given their disparate disclosing behaviors, men and women may thus be differentially advantaged by, or susceptible to, the positive and negative consequences of information sharing

Cognitive psychology · Developmental psychology · Exploratory research · Moderation · Negative information · Normative · Recall · Self-disclosure · Valence (chemistry · Digital Marketing and Social Media · Mental Health via Writing · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Explaining Chinese ethnic minority adolescents’ self-disclosure on social media with fsQCA

    Open Access•Qingqing Hu, Yan Yue et al.•Cogent Social Sciences•2025

  • Self‐Disclosure and Psychological Well‐Being in Chinese Adolescents

    Open Access•Antonia Yuxin Hua, Lixian Cui•Journal of Adolescence•2026

  • Mediating effect of fear of happiness between intolerance of uncertainty and anxiety among Lebanese adults

    Open Access•Laetitia Gerbaka, Diana Malaeb et al.•Cambridge Prisms Global Mental…•2026

  • Psychosocial predictors and gender differences in the mental well-being of adolescents living with HIV in Ibadan, Nigeria

    Ezekiel O Aruoture, Abel C Obosi•African Journal of AIDS Research•2025

  • Advancing the health and well‐being of boys and men

    Open Access•Aster Van Rossum, Nurit Shnabel et al.•Social Issues and Policy Review•2024

  • The Marketplace of Existential Authenticity

    Open Access•Gabrielle Patry-Beaudoin, Jay M Handelman et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•2025

  • Gender and conversational interaction

    Deborah Tannen•Gender and conversational…•1993

  • Sex Differences in Social Behavior

    Alice H Eagly•Sex Differences in Social Behavior•2013

  • Emotion Elicits the Social Sharing of Emotion

    Open Access•Bernard Rimé•Emotion Review•2009

  • Disclosing information about the self is intrinsically rewarding

    Open Access•Diana Tamir, Diana I Tamir et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2012

  • Word of mouth and interpersonal communication

    Open Access•Jonah Berger•Journal of Consumer Psychology•2014

  • The relation between gender and emotion in different cultures

    Open Access•Agneta H Fischer, Agneta Fischer et al.•Gender and Emotion•2000

  • Beyond the emotional event

    Bernard Rimé, Batja Mesquita et al.•Cognition & Emotion•1991

  • Measurement of social-evaluative anxiety.

    David Watson, David C Watson et al.•Journal of Consulting and…•1969

  • When Social Networking Is Not Working

    Open Access•Amanda L Forest, Joanne V Wood•Psychological Science•2012

  • Computer-Mediated Communication in Personal Relationships

    Kevin B Wright, Lynne M Webb•Computer-Mediated Communication…•2011

  • Boundaries of Privacy

    Sandra Petronio•Boundaries of Privacy•2002

  • Gender differences in power and self‐disclosure in dating and married couples

    Open Access•Bernard I Murstein, Elizabeth R Adler•Personal Relationships•1995

  • Self-disclosure and liking

    Nancy L Collins, Lynn C Miller•Psychological Bulletin•1994

  • Agreement and Information in the Reliability of Coding

    Klaus Krippendorff•Communication Methods and Measures•2011

  • Norms of online expressions of emotion

    Open Access•Sophie F Waterloo, Susanne E Baumgartner et al.•New Media & Society•2017

  • Ethnic, gender, and socioeconomic differences in young adults' self-disclosure

    Nathan S Consedine, Shulamit Sabag-Cohen et al.•Cultural Diversity & Ethnic…•2007

  • The Role of Status Seeking in Online Communities

    Open Access•Joseph Lampel, Ajay Bhalla•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2007

  • Intimacy Between Adolescent Friends

    Laurie R McNelles, Jennifer A Connolly et al.•Journal of Research on Adolescence•1999

  • Sex differences in self-disclosure

    Open Access•Valerian J Derlega, Bonnie Durham et al.•Sex Roles•1981

  • Development of the emotional self-disclosure scale

    Open Access•William E Snell, Rowland S Miller et al.•Sex Roles•1988

  • Friendship

    Open Access•Lynne R Davidson, Lucile Duberman•Sex Roles•1982

  • Gender differences in self-presentation

    Open Access•Kim Gale Dolgin, Nozomi Minowa•Sex Roles•1997

  • When Another Stumbles

    Open Access•Laurie Heatherington, Andrea Burns et al.•Sex Roles•1998

  • Personalization and the Promise of Contact Theory

    Open Access•Norman Miller•Journal of Social Issues•2002

  • Disclosure reciprocity and its limits

    Open Access•Richard L Archer, Richard Archer et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•1978

  • Self-promotion as a risk factor for women

    Laurie A Rudman•Journal of Personality and Social…•1998

  • The out-group must not be so bad after all

    Nurcan Ensari, Norman Miller•Journal of Personality and Social…•2002

  • The evolution of human intrasexual competition

    David M Bu•Journal of Personality and Social…•1988

  • Intimacy and reciprocity of exchange

    Teru L Morton•Journal of Personality and Social…•1978

  • Are you happy for me? How sharing positive events with others provides personal and interpersonal benefits

    H T Reis, Shannon M Smith et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2010

  • Experimental disclosure and its moderators

    Joanne Frattaroli•Psychological Bulletin•2006

  • Sex differences in self-disclosure

    Kathryn Dindia, Mike Allen•Psychological Bulletin•1992

  • Some factors in self-disclosure

    Sidney M Jourard, Paul Lasakow•Journal of Abnormal & Social…•1958

  • Gender Effects in an Initial Encounter

    Open Access•Valerian J Derlega, Barbara A Winstead et al.•Journal of Social and Personal…•1985

  • A boost of positive affect

    Open Access•Nathaniel M Lambert, A Marlea Gwinn et al.•Journal of Social and Personal…•2013

  • Differences in Expressiveness

    Jack Balswick, Jack O Balswick et al.•Journal of Marriage and the Family•1977

  • Where Consumers Diverge from Others

    Jonah Berger, Chip Heath•Journal of Consumer Research•2007

Unique citing works6
Citations per year3
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae