Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Rights and the Private Pareto Principle

Bibliographic Data

ID9728609
AuthorsPeter J Coughlin (corresponding author)
Year1986
Volume53
Issue211
Pages303
Publication date1986-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueEconomica (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0013-0427 • E-ISSN: 1468-0335
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2554136
OpenAlexW2050168683
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited15

This paper begins with a review of 'Gibbard's paradox' for rights and Gibbard's proposal for avoiding the paradox. This is followed by a theorem that identifies the pairs where rights are directly relevant (at some profile) when Gibbard's proposal is adopted. As the next step, the paper reviews 'Sen's paradox' and the 'private Pareto principle'-which has recently been proposed by Hammond as a replacement for the traditional Pareto principle, with the argument that this will make rights and Paretian comparisons compatible. The remainder of the paper is devoted to an analysis of the nature of the social pairwise comparisons that the private Pareto principle recommends for the pairs of alternatives where rights are directly relevant (at some profile). This analysis reveals that, on these pairs, the private Pareto principle makes two important concessions to rights

Argument (complex analysis) · Economics · Law and economics · Mathematical economics · Pairwise comparison · Pareto efficiency · Pareto principle · Statistics · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Legal principles and applications · Mathematics

  • Sen’s Theorem and Externalities

    Open Access•Donald E Campbell, Jerry S Kelly•Economica•1997

  • Das Paradox des Liberalismus - eine Einführung

    Open Access•Hartmut Kliemt•Analyse & Kritik•1996

  • Le paradoxe libéral-parétien

    Open Access•Herrade Igersheim•Social Science Information•2006

  • Social Choice Theory

    Amartya Sen•Econometrica•1977

  • A Pareto-consistent libertarian claim

    Open Access•Allan Gibbard•Journal of Economic Theory•1974

  • Social Choice and Individual Values

    Kenneth J Arrow, Eric S Maskin•Social Choice and Individual Values•2017

  • Alternative libertarian claims and Sen's paradox

    Open Access•Lorenz Kruger, Wulf Gaertner•Theory and Decision•1983

  • Liberal paradox and the voluntary exchange of rights-exercising

    Open Access•Kotaro Suzumura•Journal of Economic Theory•1980

  • Liberalism, Independent Rights and the Pareto Principle

    Open Access•Peter J Hammond•Logic, methodology, and…•1982

  • Anarchy, State, and Utopia

    Robert Nozick•Princeton Readings in Political…•2018

  • Restricted pareto and rights

    Open Access•David Austen-Smith, David Austen‐smith•Journal of Economic Theory•1982

  • The liberal paradox, decisiveness over issues, and domain restrictions

    Open Access•Francis Breyer, Friedrich Breyer•Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie•1977

  • On Weights and Measures

    Amartya Sen•Econometrica•1977

  • Envy-free rights assignments and self-oriented preferences

    Open Access•Wulf Gaertner•Mathematical Social Sciences•1982

  • A Difficulty in the Concept of Social Welfare

    Kenneth J Arrow•Journal of Political Economy•1950

  • The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal

    Amartya Sen•Journal of Political Economy•1970

  • Self-Supporting Preferences and Individual Rights

    Wulf Gaertner, Lorenz Kruger•Economica•1981

  • The Impossibility of a Just Liberal

    Jerry S Kelly•Economica•1976

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,1
Citation span1996 - 2006 (11)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae