Conceptualizing talent in public sector municipalities
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9964038 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Daniel Tyskbo (0000-0002-3727-6153, Halmstad University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 89 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 519-535 |
| Publication date | 2021-12-21 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Review of Administrative Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-8523 • E-ISSN: 1461-7226 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/00208523211065162 |
| OpenAlex | W4200009042 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 44 |
While talent management is considered a top priority among practitioners and constitutes a major research area, the actual meaning of talent still remains largely undefined. In response to a lack of clarity and empirical basis regarding the notion of talent, various calls have been made for exploring how organizations conceptualize talent, particularly in the public sector context. This article answers these calls by adopting a qualitative in-depth case study to explore how senior Human Resources (HR) managers in public sector municipalities conceptualize talent in practice. The findings illustrate how HR managers use a variety of conceptualizations of talent. We analyze and theorize this variation and the ways of conceptualizing talent using two conceptualization categories: non-contextual conceptualizations, which are general and related to official practices (i.e. talent as future leaders and talent as a general commitment and drive forward), and contextual conceptualizations, which are specific and related to informal assumptions (i.e. talent as Trojans and specialists, talent as individual agility, and talent as public service awareness). Points for practitioners Human Resources (HR) managers use a variety of conceptualizations of talent in practice. Two conceptualization categories – that is, “non-contextual” (general and related to official practices) and “contextual” (specific and related to informal assumptions) – help us understand this variation and the ways of conceptualizing talent. HR managers are only partly shaped by the particularities of the public sector context, and some of the talent philosophies held by HR managers do not align with the existing and official talent management practices
Business · CLARITY · Conceptualization · Context (archaeology · Empirical research · Human resources · Meaning (existential · Political science · Public relations · Public sector · Sociology · Talent Management · Variety (cybernetics · Aortic aneurysm repair treatments · Employer Branding and e-HRM · Human Resource and Talent Management · Marketing · Psychology
HRM and Performance
Organization Theory and the Public Sector
Motivation in Public Management
Transforming gifts into talents
Upper Echelons
Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research
The Oxford Handbook of Talent Management
Talent management and talented employees’ attitudes
How are management fashions institutionalized? The role of institutional work
The state of talent management in C anada's public sector
Aligning talent management with approaches to equality and diversity
Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |